Sung-Ho Kim, Sang-Yup Lee, Saet-Byul Kim, Tae-Gyun Kim, Min Jang, Sung-Ho Yun, Seong-Eun Heo, Do-Yoon Kim, Seung-Joon Kim, Won-Jae Lee
{"title":"加强牛体外受精胚胎的基因表达研究:在不同发育速度的囊胚中鉴定稳定的内参基因。","authors":"Sung-Ho Kim, Sang-Yup Lee, Saet-Byul Kim, Tae-Gyun Kim, Min Jang, Sung-Ho Yun, Seong-Eun Heo, Do-Yoon Kim, Seung-Joon Kim, Won-Jae Lee","doi":"10.1262/jrd.2025-017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vitro fertilization (IVF) is crucial for livestock reproduction; however, pregnancy rates after embryo transfer vary depending on the developmental speeds of the embryos. Although quantitative PCR (qPCR) is used to predict developmental potential, its reliability depends on the selection of appropriate reference genes (RGs) for normalization. To determine suitable RGs in bovine blastocysts with different developing speed, we evaluated the stability of eight candidate RGs (18S, ACTB, GAPDH, HMBS, PPIA, TBP, HPRT1, and SDHA) in early-, mid-, and late-developing IVF blastocysts (E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL, respectively) using RefFinder. Despite morphological similarities, E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL exhibited different biological features, including significantly lower pregnancy rates in L-BL than in the other groups, and less abundant transcript levels of five candidate RGs in L-BL than in E-BL. RefFinder revealed that ACTB was the most stable RG, whereas TBP was the least stable. To emphasize the critical importance of selecting stable RGs, we analyzed the expression of key developmental markers including those of the inner cell mass (ICM; OCT4, SOX2) and trophectoderm (TE; CDX2, GATA3, IFNτ), using various RGs for normalization. For ICM markers, normalization with ACTB showed results consistent with pregnancy rates, whereas moderately stable (18S) and less stable (TBP) RGs yielded contradictory outcomes. Normalization with unstable RGs produced inconsistent TE marker expression patterns (CDX2, GATA3) and overestimated (IFNτ) results across groups, compared with the results of ACTB. These results demonstrate that selecting inappropriate RGs for qPCR normalization can lead to misinterpretation, highlighting the necessity of proper RG evaluation to ensure accurate results in bovine embryo research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproduction and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing gene expression studies in bovine embryos fertilized in vitro: identifying stable reference genes across blastocysts with different developmental speeds.\",\"authors\":\"Sung-Ho Kim, Sang-Yup Lee, Saet-Byul Kim, Tae-Gyun Kim, Min Jang, Sung-Ho Yun, Seong-Eun Heo, Do-Yoon Kim, Seung-Joon Kim, Won-Jae Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1262/jrd.2025-017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In vitro fertilization (IVF) is crucial for livestock reproduction; however, pregnancy rates after embryo transfer vary depending on the developmental speeds of the embryos. Although quantitative PCR (qPCR) is used to predict developmental potential, its reliability depends on the selection of appropriate reference genes (RGs) for normalization. To determine suitable RGs in bovine blastocysts with different developing speed, we evaluated the stability of eight candidate RGs (18S, ACTB, GAPDH, HMBS, PPIA, TBP, HPRT1, and SDHA) in early-, mid-, and late-developing IVF blastocysts (E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL, respectively) using RefFinder. Despite morphological similarities, E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL exhibited different biological features, including significantly lower pregnancy rates in L-BL than in the other groups, and less abundant transcript levels of five candidate RGs in L-BL than in E-BL. RefFinder revealed that ACTB was the most stable RG, whereas TBP was the least stable. To emphasize the critical importance of selecting stable RGs, we analyzed the expression of key developmental markers including those of the inner cell mass (ICM; OCT4, SOX2) and trophectoderm (TE; CDX2, GATA3, IFNτ), using various RGs for normalization. For ICM markers, normalization with ACTB showed results consistent with pregnancy rates, whereas moderately stable (18S) and less stable (TBP) RGs yielded contradictory outcomes. Normalization with unstable RGs produced inconsistent TE marker expression patterns (CDX2, GATA3) and overestimated (IFNτ) results across groups, compared with the results of ACTB. These results demonstrate that selecting inappropriate RGs for qPCR normalization can lead to misinterpretation, highlighting the necessity of proper RG evaluation to ensure accurate results in bovine embryo research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reproduction and Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reproduction and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2025-017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproduction and Development","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2025-017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing gene expression studies in bovine embryos fertilized in vitro: identifying stable reference genes across blastocysts with different developmental speeds.
In vitro fertilization (IVF) is crucial for livestock reproduction; however, pregnancy rates after embryo transfer vary depending on the developmental speeds of the embryos. Although quantitative PCR (qPCR) is used to predict developmental potential, its reliability depends on the selection of appropriate reference genes (RGs) for normalization. To determine suitable RGs in bovine blastocysts with different developing speed, we evaluated the stability of eight candidate RGs (18S, ACTB, GAPDH, HMBS, PPIA, TBP, HPRT1, and SDHA) in early-, mid-, and late-developing IVF blastocysts (E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL, respectively) using RefFinder. Despite morphological similarities, E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL exhibited different biological features, including significantly lower pregnancy rates in L-BL than in the other groups, and less abundant transcript levels of five candidate RGs in L-BL than in E-BL. RefFinder revealed that ACTB was the most stable RG, whereas TBP was the least stable. To emphasize the critical importance of selecting stable RGs, we analyzed the expression of key developmental markers including those of the inner cell mass (ICM; OCT4, SOX2) and trophectoderm (TE; CDX2, GATA3, IFNτ), using various RGs for normalization. For ICM markers, normalization with ACTB showed results consistent with pregnancy rates, whereas moderately stable (18S) and less stable (TBP) RGs yielded contradictory outcomes. Normalization with unstable RGs produced inconsistent TE marker expression patterns (CDX2, GATA3) and overestimated (IFNτ) results across groups, compared with the results of ACTB. These results demonstrate that selecting inappropriate RGs for qPCR normalization can lead to misinterpretation, highlighting the necessity of proper RG evaluation to ensure accurate results in bovine embryo research.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Reproduction and Development (JRD) is the
official journal of the Society for Reproduction and Development,
published bimonthly, and welcomes original articles. JRD
provides free full-text access of all the published articles on
the web. The functions of the journal are managed by Editorial
Board Members, such as the Editor-in-Chief, Co-Editor-inChief, Managing Editors and Editors. All manuscripts are
peer-reviewed critically by two or more reviewers. Acceptance
is based on scientific content and presentation of the materials.
The Editors select reviewers and correspond with authors. Final
decisions about acceptance or rejection of manuscripts are made
by the Editor-in-Chief and Co-Editor-in-Chief.