加强牛体外受精胚胎的基因表达研究:在不同发育速度的囊胚中鉴定稳定的内参基因。

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Sung-Ho Kim, Sang-Yup Lee, Saet-Byul Kim, Tae-Gyun Kim, Min Jang, Sung-Ho Yun, Seong-Eun Heo, Do-Yoon Kim, Seung-Joon Kim, Won-Jae Lee
{"title":"加强牛体外受精胚胎的基因表达研究:在不同发育速度的囊胚中鉴定稳定的内参基因。","authors":"Sung-Ho Kim, Sang-Yup Lee, Saet-Byul Kim, Tae-Gyun Kim, Min Jang, Sung-Ho Yun, Seong-Eun Heo, Do-Yoon Kim, Seung-Joon Kim, Won-Jae Lee","doi":"10.1262/jrd.2025-017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vitro fertilization (IVF) is crucial for livestock reproduction; however, pregnancy rates after embryo transfer vary depending on the developmental speeds of the embryos. Although quantitative PCR (qPCR) is used to predict developmental potential, its reliability depends on the selection of appropriate reference genes (RGs) for normalization. To determine suitable RGs in bovine blastocysts with different developing speed, we evaluated the stability of eight candidate RGs (18S, ACTB, GAPDH, HMBS, PPIA, TBP, HPRT1, and SDHA) in early-, mid-, and late-developing IVF blastocysts (E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL, respectively) using RefFinder. Despite morphological similarities, E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL exhibited different biological features, including significantly lower pregnancy rates in L-BL than in the other groups, and less abundant transcript levels of five candidate RGs in L-BL than in E-BL. RefFinder revealed that ACTB was the most stable RG, whereas TBP was the least stable. To emphasize the critical importance of selecting stable RGs, we analyzed the expression of key developmental markers including those of the inner cell mass (ICM; OCT4, SOX2) and trophectoderm (TE; CDX2, GATA3, IFNτ), using various RGs for normalization. For ICM markers, normalization with ACTB showed results consistent with pregnancy rates, whereas moderately stable (18S) and less stable (TBP) RGs yielded contradictory outcomes. Normalization with unstable RGs produced inconsistent TE marker expression patterns (CDX2, GATA3) and overestimated (IFNτ) results across groups, compared with the results of ACTB. These results demonstrate that selecting inappropriate RGs for qPCR normalization can lead to misinterpretation, highlighting the necessity of proper RG evaluation to ensure accurate results in bovine embryo research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproduction and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing gene expression studies in bovine embryos fertilized in vitro: identifying stable reference genes across blastocysts with different developmental speeds.\",\"authors\":\"Sung-Ho Kim, Sang-Yup Lee, Saet-Byul Kim, Tae-Gyun Kim, Min Jang, Sung-Ho Yun, Seong-Eun Heo, Do-Yoon Kim, Seung-Joon Kim, Won-Jae Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1262/jrd.2025-017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In vitro fertilization (IVF) is crucial for livestock reproduction; however, pregnancy rates after embryo transfer vary depending on the developmental speeds of the embryos. Although quantitative PCR (qPCR) is used to predict developmental potential, its reliability depends on the selection of appropriate reference genes (RGs) for normalization. To determine suitable RGs in bovine blastocysts with different developing speed, we evaluated the stability of eight candidate RGs (18S, ACTB, GAPDH, HMBS, PPIA, TBP, HPRT1, and SDHA) in early-, mid-, and late-developing IVF blastocysts (E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL, respectively) using RefFinder. Despite morphological similarities, E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL exhibited different biological features, including significantly lower pregnancy rates in L-BL than in the other groups, and less abundant transcript levels of five candidate RGs in L-BL than in E-BL. RefFinder revealed that ACTB was the most stable RG, whereas TBP was the least stable. To emphasize the critical importance of selecting stable RGs, we analyzed the expression of key developmental markers including those of the inner cell mass (ICM; OCT4, SOX2) and trophectoderm (TE; CDX2, GATA3, IFNτ), using various RGs for normalization. For ICM markers, normalization with ACTB showed results consistent with pregnancy rates, whereas moderately stable (18S) and less stable (TBP) RGs yielded contradictory outcomes. Normalization with unstable RGs produced inconsistent TE marker expression patterns (CDX2, GATA3) and overestimated (IFNτ) results across groups, compared with the results of ACTB. These results demonstrate that selecting inappropriate RGs for qPCR normalization can lead to misinterpretation, highlighting the necessity of proper RG evaluation to ensure accurate results in bovine embryo research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reproduction and Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reproduction and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2025-017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproduction and Development","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2025-017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体外受精(IVF)对家畜繁殖至关重要;然而,胚胎移植后的怀孕率取决于胚胎的发育速度。虽然定量PCR (qPCR)用于预测发育潜力,但其可靠性取决于选择合适的内参基因(RGs)进行规范化。为了确定不同发育速度的牛囊胚中适合的RGs,我们使用RefFinder对8种候选RGs (18S、ACTB、GAPDH、HMBS、PPIA、TBP、HPRT1和SDHA)在早期、中期和晚期IVF囊胚(分别为E-BL、M-BL和L-BL)中的稳定性进行了评价。尽管形态相似,但E-BL、M-BL和L-BL表现出不同的生物学特征,包括L-BL的妊娠率明显低于其他组,L-BL中5种候选RGs的转录水平低于E-BL。RefFinder发现ACTB是最稳定的RG,而TBP是最不稳定的。为了强调选择稳定的RGs的重要性,我们分析了关键发育标志物的表达,包括内细胞团(ICM);OCT4, SOX2)和滋养外胚层(TE;CDX2, GATA3, IFNτ),使用各种RGs进行归一化。对于ICM标记物,ACTB正常化显示的结果与妊娠率一致,而中等稳定(18S)和不稳定(TBP)的RGs则产生矛盾的结果。与ACTB的结果相比,不稳定RGs的归一化导致各组TE标记物表达模式(CDX2, GATA3)不一致,IFNτ过高。这些结果表明,选择不合适的RG进行qPCR归一化可能导致误读,强调了正确评估RG以确保牛胚胎研究结果准确的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing gene expression studies in bovine embryos fertilized in vitro: identifying stable reference genes across blastocysts with different developmental speeds.

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is crucial for livestock reproduction; however, pregnancy rates after embryo transfer vary depending on the developmental speeds of the embryos. Although quantitative PCR (qPCR) is used to predict developmental potential, its reliability depends on the selection of appropriate reference genes (RGs) for normalization. To determine suitable RGs in bovine blastocysts with different developing speed, we evaluated the stability of eight candidate RGs (18S, ACTB, GAPDH, HMBS, PPIA, TBP, HPRT1, and SDHA) in early-, mid-, and late-developing IVF blastocysts (E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL, respectively) using RefFinder. Despite morphological similarities, E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL exhibited different biological features, including significantly lower pregnancy rates in L-BL than in the other groups, and less abundant transcript levels of five candidate RGs in L-BL than in E-BL. RefFinder revealed that ACTB was the most stable RG, whereas TBP was the least stable. To emphasize the critical importance of selecting stable RGs, we analyzed the expression of key developmental markers including those of the inner cell mass (ICM; OCT4, SOX2) and trophectoderm (TE; CDX2, GATA3, IFNτ), using various RGs for normalization. For ICM markers, normalization with ACTB showed results consistent with pregnancy rates, whereas moderately stable (18S) and less stable (TBP) RGs yielded contradictory outcomes. Normalization with unstable RGs produced inconsistent TE marker expression patterns (CDX2, GATA3) and overestimated (IFNτ) results across groups, compared with the results of ACTB. These results demonstrate that selecting inappropriate RGs for qPCR normalization can lead to misinterpretation, highlighting the necessity of proper RG evaluation to ensure accurate results in bovine embryo research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reproduction and Development
Journal of Reproduction and Development 生物-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Reproduction and Development (JRD) is the official journal of the Society for Reproduction and Development, published bimonthly, and welcomes original articles. JRD provides free full-text access of all the published articles on the web. The functions of the journal are managed by Editorial Board Members, such as the Editor-in-Chief, Co-Editor-inChief, Managing Editors and Editors. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed critically by two or more reviewers. Acceptance is based on scientific content and presentation of the materials. The Editors select reviewers and correspond with authors. Final decisions about acceptance or rejection of manuscripts are made by the Editor-in-Chief and Co-Editor-in-Chief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信