COVID-19疫苗接种的知情决策-决策支持干预的发展和可行性:一项混合方法研究

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Jana Kaden, Julia Peper, Anne C Rahn, Birte Berger-Höger
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗接种的知情决策-决策支持干预的发展和可行性:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Jana Kaden, Julia Peper, Anne C Rahn, Birte Berger-Höger","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2025.2515533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many people, particularly from vulnerable groups, experienced decisional conflict regarding COVID-19 vaccination. To support informed decision-making, we developed and pilot-tested a decision support intervention consisting of a patient decision aid and non-directive decision coaching led by a trained health professional. We developed a training program to prepare healthcare professionals to implement the intervention. To assess the decisional needs of unvaccinated individuals, a literature review and a focus group with community health workers were conducted. The results informed the development of the intervention and the associated training for health professionals, which were then tested regarding their comprehensibility, feasibility, and acceptance. Fourteen health professionals completed a 540-minute training and participated in guided focus groups. The decision support intervention was subsequently tested with laypeople through guided interviews. Data were analyzed via qualitative content analysis. The training was feasible and well accepted, and the competencies to provide decision coaching were acquired. The decision coaching offer was tested in two real and seven simulated sessions. The patient decision aid, comprising an evidence-based COVID-19 information sheet and a decision guidance, was comprehensible and highly accepted by all participants. While the intervention proved feasible, access to vulnerable groups and their willingness to participate remained low.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informed Decision-Making About COVID-19 Vaccination - Development and Feasibility of a Decision Support Intervention: A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jana Kaden, Julia Peper, Anne C Rahn, Birte Berger-Höger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10810730.2025.2515533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many people, particularly from vulnerable groups, experienced decisional conflict regarding COVID-19 vaccination. To support informed decision-making, we developed and pilot-tested a decision support intervention consisting of a patient decision aid and non-directive decision coaching led by a trained health professional. We developed a training program to prepare healthcare professionals to implement the intervention. To assess the decisional needs of unvaccinated individuals, a literature review and a focus group with community health workers were conducted. The results informed the development of the intervention and the associated training for health professionals, which were then tested regarding their comprehensibility, feasibility, and acceptance. Fourteen health professionals completed a 540-minute training and participated in guided focus groups. The decision support intervention was subsequently tested with laypeople through guided interviews. Data were analyzed via qualitative content analysis. The training was feasible and well accepted, and the competencies to provide decision coaching were acquired. The decision coaching offer was tested in two real and seven simulated sessions. The patient decision aid, comprising an evidence-based COVID-19 information sheet and a decision guidance, was comprehensible and highly accepted by all participants. While the intervention proved feasible, access to vulnerable groups and their willingness to participate remained low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2025.2515533\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2025.2515533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多人,特别是来自弱势群体的人,在COVID-19疫苗接种问题上经历了决策冲突。为了支持明智的决策,我们开发并试点测试了一种决策支持干预措施,包括患者决策辅助和由训练有素的卫生专业人员领导的非指导性决策指导。我们制定了一项培训计划,为医疗保健专业人员实施干预做好准备。为了评估未接种疫苗个体的决定性需求,进行了文献综述和社区卫生工作者焦点小组。结果为干预措施的制定和对卫生专业人员的相关培训提供了信息,然后对其可理解性、可行性和可接受性进行了测试。14名保健专业人员完成了540分钟的培训,并参加了有指导的焦点小组。决策支持干预随后通过引导访谈在外行人中进行测试。数据通过定性内容分析进行分析。培训是可行的和被广泛接受的,并且获得了提供决策指导的能力。决策指导的提议在两次真实和七次模拟会议中进行了测试。患者决策援助包括基于证据的COVID-19信息表和决策指南,易于理解并得到所有参与者的高度接受。虽然干预措施证明是可行的,但接触弱势群体的机会和他们参与的意愿仍然很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informed Decision-Making About COVID-19 Vaccination - Development and Feasibility of a Decision Support Intervention: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Many people, particularly from vulnerable groups, experienced decisional conflict regarding COVID-19 vaccination. To support informed decision-making, we developed and pilot-tested a decision support intervention consisting of a patient decision aid and non-directive decision coaching led by a trained health professional. We developed a training program to prepare healthcare professionals to implement the intervention. To assess the decisional needs of unvaccinated individuals, a literature review and a focus group with community health workers were conducted. The results informed the development of the intervention and the associated training for health professionals, which were then tested regarding their comprehensibility, feasibility, and acceptance. Fourteen health professionals completed a 540-minute training and participated in guided focus groups. The decision support intervention was subsequently tested with laypeople through guided interviews. Data were analyzed via qualitative content analysis. The training was feasible and well accepted, and the competencies to provide decision coaching were acquired. The decision coaching offer was tested in two real and seven simulated sessions. The patient decision aid, comprising an evidence-based COVID-19 information sheet and a decision guidance, was comprehensible and highly accepted by all participants. While the intervention proved feasible, access to vulnerable groups and their willingness to participate remained low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信