l -精氨酸与l -谷氨酰胺口服混悬液治疗放射性口腔黏膜炎:一项三盲随机试验。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Fatma E A Hassanein, Christine Mikhail, Sarah Elkot, Asmaa Abou-Bakr
{"title":"l -精氨酸与l -谷氨酰胺口服混悬液治疗放射性口腔黏膜炎:一项三盲随机试验。","authors":"Fatma E A Hassanein, Christine Mikhail, Sarah Elkot, Asmaa Abou-Bakr","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06213-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) severely impacts patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy, often leading to pain and malnutrition. L-arginine and glutamine are immune-enhancing amino acids with potential benefits in wound healing and inflammation control. This study evaluated the efficacy of L-arginine versus L-glutamine oral suspensions in managing RIOM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this triple-blind, randomized controlled trial, 69 HNC patients with RIOM were allocated to three groups (n = 23 each): Group I (L-arginine 5 g + maltodextrin 5 g), Group II (glutamine 5 g + maltodextrin 5 g), or Group III (maltodextrin 10 g). Outcomes, assessed at weeks 2, 5, and 7 of radiotherapy, included the WHO oral mucositis scale, Pain Visual Analogue Scale (Pain-VAS), body mass index (BMI), and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By week 5, WHO scale scores differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001), with arginine and glutamine groups exhibiting lower mucositis severity than the maltodextrin group. Pain-VAS scores at weeks 5 and 7 were significantly lower in the arginine and glutamine groups compared to maltodextrin (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). By 7th week of radiotherapy, BMI was significantly decreased in the maltodextrin group than in either the arginine (p = 0.028) or glutamine (p = 0.001) groups, indicative of treatment-mediated weight loss. In contrast, the BMI over time in the arginine (p = 0.87) and glutamine (p = 0.170) groups were almost constant. This indicates that compared to maltodextrin alone, both amino acid supplements prevented a decline in BMI during radiotherapy. OHIP-14 scores improved significantly in the arginine and glutamine groups at weeks 5 and 7 (p < 0.001), indicating better quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both L-arginine and glutamine significantly reduced RIOM severity, pain, and weight loss compared to maltodextrin, while improving quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Although no statistically significant difference was found between the two, a higher proportion of patients receiving L-arginine achieved complete healing by week 7, suggesting a potential late advantage. These findings support the use of both amino acids as viable options for symptom management during radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06764420), registered 08/01/2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 7","pages":"198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L-arginine vs. L-glutamine oral suspensions for radiation-induced oral mucositis: a triple-blind randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Fatma E A Hassanein, Christine Mikhail, Sarah Elkot, Asmaa Abou-Bakr\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-025-06213-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) severely impacts patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy, often leading to pain and malnutrition. L-arginine and glutamine are immune-enhancing amino acids with potential benefits in wound healing and inflammation control. This study evaluated the efficacy of L-arginine versus L-glutamine oral suspensions in managing RIOM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this triple-blind, randomized controlled trial, 69 HNC patients with RIOM were allocated to three groups (n = 23 each): Group I (L-arginine 5 g + maltodextrin 5 g), Group II (glutamine 5 g + maltodextrin 5 g), or Group III (maltodextrin 10 g). Outcomes, assessed at weeks 2, 5, and 7 of radiotherapy, included the WHO oral mucositis scale, Pain Visual Analogue Scale (Pain-VAS), body mass index (BMI), and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By week 5, WHO scale scores differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001), with arginine and glutamine groups exhibiting lower mucositis severity than the maltodextrin group. Pain-VAS scores at weeks 5 and 7 were significantly lower in the arginine and glutamine groups compared to maltodextrin (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). By 7th week of radiotherapy, BMI was significantly decreased in the maltodextrin group than in either the arginine (p = 0.028) or glutamine (p = 0.001) groups, indicative of treatment-mediated weight loss. In contrast, the BMI over time in the arginine (p = 0.87) and glutamine (p = 0.170) groups were almost constant. This indicates that compared to maltodextrin alone, both amino acid supplements prevented a decline in BMI during radiotherapy. OHIP-14 scores improved significantly in the arginine and glutamine groups at weeks 5 and 7 (p < 0.001), indicating better quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both L-arginine and glutamine significantly reduced RIOM severity, pain, and weight loss compared to maltodextrin, while improving quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Although no statistically significant difference was found between the two, a higher proportion of patients receiving L-arginine achieved complete healing by week 7, suggesting a potential late advantage. These findings support the use of both amino acids as viable options for symptom management during radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06764420), registered 08/01/2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"151 7\",\"pages\":\"198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222376/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06213-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06213-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:放射性口腔黏膜炎(RIOM)严重影响头颈癌(HNC)放疗患者,常导致疼痛和营养不良。l -精氨酸和谷氨酰胺是免疫增强氨基酸,对伤口愈合和炎症控制有潜在的好处。本研究评估了l -精氨酸与l -谷氨酰胺口服混悬液治疗RIOM的疗效。方法:在这项三盲、随机对照试验中,69例HNC RIOM患者被分为三组(n = 23): I组(l -精氨酸5g +麦芽糊精5g)、II组(谷氨酰胺5g +麦芽糊精5g)和III组(麦芽糊精10 g)。在放疗的第2、5和7周评估的结果包括WHO口腔黏膜炎量表、疼痛视觉模拟量表(Pain- vas)、体重指数(BMI)和口腔健康影响问卷(OHIP-14)。结果:到第5周,WHO量表评分组间差异显著(p)。结论:与麦芽糖糊精相比,l -精氨酸和谷氨酰胺均可显著降低RIOM严重程度、疼痛和体重减轻,同时改善头颈癌患者的生活质量。虽然两者之间没有统计学上的显著差异,但接受l -精氨酸治疗的患者在第7周完全愈合的比例更高,这表明可能具有晚期优势。这些发现支持使用这两种氨基酸作为放射治疗期间症状管理的可行选择。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06764420),注册日期为2024年8月1日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
L-arginine vs. L-glutamine oral suspensions for radiation-induced oral mucositis: a triple-blind randomized trial.

Purpose: Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) severely impacts patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy, often leading to pain and malnutrition. L-arginine and glutamine are immune-enhancing amino acids with potential benefits in wound healing and inflammation control. This study evaluated the efficacy of L-arginine versus L-glutamine oral suspensions in managing RIOM.

Methods: In this triple-blind, randomized controlled trial, 69 HNC patients with RIOM were allocated to three groups (n = 23 each): Group I (L-arginine 5 g + maltodextrin 5 g), Group II (glutamine 5 g + maltodextrin 5 g), or Group III (maltodextrin 10 g). Outcomes, assessed at weeks 2, 5, and 7 of radiotherapy, included the WHO oral mucositis scale, Pain Visual Analogue Scale (Pain-VAS), body mass index (BMI), and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire.

Results: By week 5, WHO scale scores differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001), with arginine and glutamine groups exhibiting lower mucositis severity than the maltodextrin group. Pain-VAS scores at weeks 5 and 7 were significantly lower in the arginine and glutamine groups compared to maltodextrin (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). By 7th week of radiotherapy, BMI was significantly decreased in the maltodextrin group than in either the arginine (p = 0.028) or glutamine (p = 0.001) groups, indicative of treatment-mediated weight loss. In contrast, the BMI over time in the arginine (p = 0.87) and glutamine (p = 0.170) groups were almost constant. This indicates that compared to maltodextrin alone, both amino acid supplements prevented a decline in BMI during radiotherapy. OHIP-14 scores improved significantly in the arginine and glutamine groups at weeks 5 and 7 (p < 0.001), indicating better quality of life.

Conclusions: Both L-arginine and glutamine significantly reduced RIOM severity, pain, and weight loss compared to maltodextrin, while improving quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Although no statistically significant difference was found between the two, a higher proportion of patients receiving L-arginine achieved complete healing by week 7, suggesting a potential late advantage. These findings support the use of both amino acids as viable options for symptom management during radiotherapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06764420), registered 08/01/2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信