毒素基因ccdB和kill的结合递送可协同杀死细菌受体。

IF 3 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Bacteriology Pub Date : 2025-07-24 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1128/jb.00168-25
Yang Grace Li, Daniel Haeusser, William Margolin, Peter J Christie
{"title":"毒素基因ccdB和kill的结合递送可协同杀死细菌受体。","authors":"Yang Grace Li, Daniel Haeusser, William Margolin, Peter J Christie","doi":"10.1128/jb.00168-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The bacterial type IV secretion systems (T4SS) are medically problematic for their roles in the dissemination of mobile genetic elements or effector proteins, but they also have great potential for new antimicrobial therapies. Recent studies have deployed the T4SS subfamily of conjugation systems to deliver gene editing CRISPR/Cas systems to disrupt drug resistance genes or kill targeted bacterial recipients. However, the therapeutic potential of conjugative CRISPR/Cas delivery is compromised by mutations or host repair systems that diminish the efficiency with which CRISPR/Cas induces double-strand breaks in new transconjugants. Here, we compared the efficiencies of conjugation-based killing systems based on the delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 elements or toxin genes encoding the bacteriophage lambda Kil peptide or the F plasmid-encoded CcdB. <i>Escherichia coli</i> equipped with one of two efficient conjugation systems, pKM101 (IncN) or F (IncF), served as donors to mobilize plasmids carrying the cognate <i>oriT</i> sequence and one or more toxic elements. Overall, toxin gene delivery proved significantly more effective than CRISPR-Cas9 in killing of transconjugant population, but the highest levels of growth suppression of both <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> recipients were achieved by a combination of CRISPR-Cas9 plus one or two toxin genes. By contrast, capsule production conferred no or very slight protective effects on plasmid acquisition and killing of either species. We propose that the conjugative co-transfer of two or more toxic elements with distinct mechanisms of action has strong potential for growth suppression of targeted species in environmental or clinical settings.IMPORTANCEThe prevalence of antibiotic resistance emphasizes the need for alternative antimicrobial intervention strategies. We engineered <i>Escherichia coli</i> for conjugative transmission of plasmids encoding CRISPR-Cas9 elements or genes encoding the cell division inhibitor Kil or gyrase poisoner CcdB. Delivery of toxin genes more effectively suppressed the growth of <i>E. coli</i> recipients than CRISPR-Cas9, but the combinatorial delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 and a toxin gene or two toxin genes elicited the strongest killing effects. Capsule production by <i>E. coli</i> or <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> recipient cells had no or little protective effect on plasmid acquisition or growth suppression. Our findings suggest that probiotic donor strains equipped for conjugative delivery of two or more toxic elements may prove effective as an alternative or adjunct to traditional antimicrobials.</p>","PeriodicalId":15107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bacteriology","volume":" ","pages":"e0016825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conjugative delivery of toxin genes <i>ccdB</i> and <i>kil</i> confers synergistic killing of bacterial recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Grace Li, Daniel Haeusser, William Margolin, Peter J Christie\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jb.00168-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The bacterial type IV secretion systems (T4SS) are medically problematic for their roles in the dissemination of mobile genetic elements or effector proteins, but they also have great potential for new antimicrobial therapies. Recent studies have deployed the T4SS subfamily of conjugation systems to deliver gene editing CRISPR/Cas systems to disrupt drug resistance genes or kill targeted bacterial recipients. However, the therapeutic potential of conjugative CRISPR/Cas delivery is compromised by mutations or host repair systems that diminish the efficiency with which CRISPR/Cas induces double-strand breaks in new transconjugants. Here, we compared the efficiencies of conjugation-based killing systems based on the delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 elements or toxin genes encoding the bacteriophage lambda Kil peptide or the F plasmid-encoded CcdB. <i>Escherichia coli</i> equipped with one of two efficient conjugation systems, pKM101 (IncN) or F (IncF), served as donors to mobilize plasmids carrying the cognate <i>oriT</i> sequence and one or more toxic elements. Overall, toxin gene delivery proved significantly more effective than CRISPR-Cas9 in killing of transconjugant population, but the highest levels of growth suppression of both <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> recipients were achieved by a combination of CRISPR-Cas9 plus one or two toxin genes. By contrast, capsule production conferred no or very slight protective effects on plasmid acquisition and killing of either species. We propose that the conjugative co-transfer of two or more toxic elements with distinct mechanisms of action has strong potential for growth suppression of targeted species in environmental or clinical settings.IMPORTANCEThe prevalence of antibiotic resistance emphasizes the need for alternative antimicrobial intervention strategies. We engineered <i>Escherichia coli</i> for conjugative transmission of plasmids encoding CRISPR-Cas9 elements or genes encoding the cell division inhibitor Kil or gyrase poisoner CcdB. Delivery of toxin genes more effectively suppressed the growth of <i>E. coli</i> recipients than CRISPR-Cas9, but the combinatorial delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 and a toxin gene or two toxin genes elicited the strongest killing effects. Capsule production by <i>E. coli</i> or <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> recipient cells had no or little protective effect on plasmid acquisition or growth suppression. Our findings suggest that probiotic donor strains equipped for conjugative delivery of two or more toxic elements may prove effective as an alternative or adjunct to traditional antimicrobials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bacteriology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0016825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288468/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bacteriology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00168-25\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00168-25","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

细菌IV型分泌系统(T4SS)因其在移动遗传元件或效应蛋白传播中的作用而在医学上存在问题,但它们也具有新的抗菌疗法的巨大潜力。最近的研究已经部署了接合系统的T4SS亚家族,以传递基因编辑CRISPR/Cas系统来破坏耐药基因或杀死目标细菌受体。然而,结合CRISPR/Cas传递的治疗潜力受到突变或宿主修复系统的影响,这些突变或修复系统降低了CRISPR/Cas诱导新转偶联物双链断裂的效率。在这里,我们比较了基于CRISPR-Cas9元件或编码噬菌体lambda Kil肽或F质粒编码CcdB的毒素基因传递的偶联杀伤系统的效率。配备pKM101 (IncN)或F (IncF)两种高效偶联系统之一的大肠杆菌作为供体,动员携带同源oriT序列和一种或多种有毒元素的质粒。总的来说,毒素基因传递在杀死转共轭菌群方面比CRISPR-Cas9更有效,但通过CRISPR-Cas9与一个或两个毒素基因的组合,大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌受体的生长抑制水平最高。相比之下,胶囊生产对两个物种的质粒获取和杀死没有或非常轻微的保护作用。我们提出,在环境或临床环境中,两种或两种以上具有不同作用机制的有毒元素的共轭共转移具有抑制目标物种生长的强大潜力。重要性:抗生素耐药性的普遍存在强调了寻找其他抗微生物干预策略的必要性。我们对大肠杆菌进行了工程改造,使其能够结合传播编码CRISPR-Cas9元件的质粒或编码细胞分裂抑制剂Kil或gyrase投毒剂CcdB的基因。毒素基因的传递比CRISPR-Cas9更有效地抑制了大肠杆菌受体的生长,但CRISPR-Cas9与一个或两个毒素基因的组合传递产生了最强的杀伤效果。大肠杆菌或肺炎克雷伯菌受体细胞生产胶囊对质粒获取或生长抑制没有或很少有保护作用。我们的研究结果表明,配备了结合递送两种或两种以上有毒元素的益生菌供体菌株可能被证明是传统抗菌素的有效替代或辅助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conjugative delivery of toxin genes ccdB and kil confers synergistic killing of bacterial recipients.

The bacterial type IV secretion systems (T4SS) are medically problematic for their roles in the dissemination of mobile genetic elements or effector proteins, but they also have great potential for new antimicrobial therapies. Recent studies have deployed the T4SS subfamily of conjugation systems to deliver gene editing CRISPR/Cas systems to disrupt drug resistance genes or kill targeted bacterial recipients. However, the therapeutic potential of conjugative CRISPR/Cas delivery is compromised by mutations or host repair systems that diminish the efficiency with which CRISPR/Cas induces double-strand breaks in new transconjugants. Here, we compared the efficiencies of conjugation-based killing systems based on the delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 elements or toxin genes encoding the bacteriophage lambda Kil peptide or the F plasmid-encoded CcdB. Escherichia coli equipped with one of two efficient conjugation systems, pKM101 (IncN) or F (IncF), served as donors to mobilize plasmids carrying the cognate oriT sequence and one or more toxic elements. Overall, toxin gene delivery proved significantly more effective than CRISPR-Cas9 in killing of transconjugant population, but the highest levels of growth suppression of both E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae recipients were achieved by a combination of CRISPR-Cas9 plus one or two toxin genes. By contrast, capsule production conferred no or very slight protective effects on plasmid acquisition and killing of either species. We propose that the conjugative co-transfer of two or more toxic elements with distinct mechanisms of action has strong potential for growth suppression of targeted species in environmental or clinical settings.IMPORTANCEThe prevalence of antibiotic resistance emphasizes the need for alternative antimicrobial intervention strategies. We engineered Escherichia coli for conjugative transmission of plasmids encoding CRISPR-Cas9 elements or genes encoding the cell division inhibitor Kil or gyrase poisoner CcdB. Delivery of toxin genes more effectively suppressed the growth of E. coli recipients than CRISPR-Cas9, but the combinatorial delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 and a toxin gene or two toxin genes elicited the strongest killing effects. Capsule production by E. coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae recipient cells had no or little protective effect on plasmid acquisition or growth suppression. Our findings suggest that probiotic donor strains equipped for conjugative delivery of two or more toxic elements may prove effective as an alternative or adjunct to traditional antimicrobials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bacteriology
Journal of Bacteriology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.40%
发文量
324
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bacteriology (JB) publishes research articles that probe fundamental processes in bacteria, archaea and their viruses, and the molecular mechanisms by which they interact with each other and with their hosts and their environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信