全无管经皮肾镜取石术是治疗肾盏憩室结石安全有效的选择吗?

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-02 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0783
Susan Gong, Kavita Gupta, Christopher Connors, Ziv Savin, Vinay Durbhakula, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta
{"title":"全无管经皮肾镜取石术是治疗肾盏憩室结石安全有效的选择吗?","authors":"Susan Gong, Kavita Gupta, Christopher Connors, Ziv Savin, Vinay Durbhakula, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction and Objectives:</i></b> Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common treatment for caliceal diverticular calculi and provides excellent stone-free outcomes. Because of a concern for urinary stasis in the setting of a dilated nephrostomy tract, an indwelling ureteral stent and/or nephrostomy tube (NT) was traditionally left in the collecting system. The rationale for investigating totally tubeless PCNL (tt-PCNL) for the treatment of caliceal diverticula was to determine whether the advantages attributed to tt-PCNL for normal collecting system stones, such as shorter hospital stay and reduced morbidity, would extend to PCNL of caliceal diverticula. We describe our experience with tt-PCNL for caliceal diverticula, where patients typically go home the same day without any tube. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We identified 42 patients (21 tt-PCNL, 21 PCNL with a NT and/or stent [t-PCNL]) with caliceal diverticular calculi undergoing PCNL from 2013 to 2024 in our prospectively maintained PCNL database. Demographics, stone characteristics, and intraoperative data were compared. Outcomes included final stone-free rate (SFR) using the absolute (0 mm) and relative (≤2 mm, 2.1-4 mm) fragment cutoffs, diverticular cavity resolution, 30-day complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and phone calls. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and continuous variables with Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Demographics and stone characteristics were similar between groups. SFRs were 94% for tt-PCNL and 90% for t-PCNL (<i>p</i> = 0.910) using CT-based criteria, with effective diverticular resolution in 90% and 100% of cases, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.480). Complications, all Clavien-Dindo grade 1, occurred in four tt-PCNL patients and in one t-PCNL patient (<i>p</i> = 0.343). There were no statistically significant differences in readmission rates, 30-day complication and ED visit rates, or in the incidence of phone calls within 7 days. tt-PCNL patients were discharged same day, whereas t-PCNL required overnight observation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> tt-PCNL is a safe effective option for caliceal diverticular stones, offering similar SFRs and safety outcomes compared with t-PCNL, but with shorter hospital stays.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"880-887"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy a Safe and Efficacious Option for Caliceal Diverticular Calculi?\",\"authors\":\"Susan Gong, Kavita Gupta, Christopher Connors, Ziv Savin, Vinay Durbhakula, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/end.2024.0783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction and Objectives:</i></b> Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common treatment for caliceal diverticular calculi and provides excellent stone-free outcomes. Because of a concern for urinary stasis in the setting of a dilated nephrostomy tract, an indwelling ureteral stent and/or nephrostomy tube (NT) was traditionally left in the collecting system. The rationale for investigating totally tubeless PCNL (tt-PCNL) for the treatment of caliceal diverticula was to determine whether the advantages attributed to tt-PCNL for normal collecting system stones, such as shorter hospital stay and reduced morbidity, would extend to PCNL of caliceal diverticula. We describe our experience with tt-PCNL for caliceal diverticula, where patients typically go home the same day without any tube. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We identified 42 patients (21 tt-PCNL, 21 PCNL with a NT and/or stent [t-PCNL]) with caliceal diverticular calculi undergoing PCNL from 2013 to 2024 in our prospectively maintained PCNL database. Demographics, stone characteristics, and intraoperative data were compared. Outcomes included final stone-free rate (SFR) using the absolute (0 mm) and relative (≤2 mm, 2.1-4 mm) fragment cutoffs, diverticular cavity resolution, 30-day complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and phone calls. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and continuous variables with Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Demographics and stone characteristics were similar between groups. SFRs were 94% for tt-PCNL and 90% for t-PCNL (<i>p</i> = 0.910) using CT-based criteria, with effective diverticular resolution in 90% and 100% of cases, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.480). Complications, all Clavien-Dindo grade 1, occurred in four tt-PCNL patients and in one t-PCNL patient (<i>p</i> = 0.343). There were no statistically significant differences in readmission rates, 30-day complication and ED visit rates, or in the incidence of phone calls within 7 days. tt-PCNL patients were discharged same day, whereas t-PCNL required overnight observation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> tt-PCNL is a safe effective option for caliceal diverticular stones, offering similar SFRs and safety outcomes compared with t-PCNL, but with shorter hospital stays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"880-887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0783\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0783","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介和目的:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗肾盏憩室结石的常用方法,可获得良好的无结石效果。由于考虑到肾造瘘道扩张时的尿潴留,传统上留置输尿管支架和/或肾造瘘管(NT)留在收集系统中。研究全无管PCNL (tt-PCNL)治疗肾盏憩室的基本原理是为了确定tt-PCNL治疗正常收集系统结石的优势,如缩短住院时间和降低发病率,是否会扩展到肾盏憩室的PCNL。我们描述了我们使用tt-PCNL治疗肾盏憩室的经验,在这种情况下,患者通常在没有任何管的情况下当天回家。方法:在我们前瞻性维护的PCNL数据库中,从2013年至2024年,我们确定了42例肾盏憩室结石患者(21例tt-PCNL, 21例PCNL合并NT和/或支架[t-PCNL])接受PCNL。比较人口统计学、结石特征和术中数据。结果包括最终无结石率(SFR),使用绝对(0 mm)和相对(≤2 mm, 2.1-4 mm)碎片切断,憩室腔溶解,30天并发症,急诊科(ED)就诊,再入院和电话。分类变量比较采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,连续变量比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。结果:两组人口统计学特征和结石特征相似。使用基于ct的标准,tt-PCNL的SFRs为94%,t-PCNL为90% (p = 0.910),分别有90%和100%的病例有效憩室溶解(p = 0.480)。4例tt-PCNL患者和1例t-PCNL患者发生并发症,均为Clavien-Dindo 1级(p = 0.343)。两组在再入院率、30天并发症、急诊科就诊率、7天内电话发生率方面无统计学差异。tt-PCNL患者当天出院,而t-PCNL患者需要过夜观察。结论:tt-PCNL是治疗肾室结石安全有效的选择,与t-PCNL相比,其SFRs和安全性结果相似,但住院时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy a Safe and Efficacious Option for Caliceal Diverticular Calculi?

Introduction and Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common treatment for caliceal diverticular calculi and provides excellent stone-free outcomes. Because of a concern for urinary stasis in the setting of a dilated nephrostomy tract, an indwelling ureteral stent and/or nephrostomy tube (NT) was traditionally left in the collecting system. The rationale for investigating totally tubeless PCNL (tt-PCNL) for the treatment of caliceal diverticula was to determine whether the advantages attributed to tt-PCNL for normal collecting system stones, such as shorter hospital stay and reduced morbidity, would extend to PCNL of caliceal diverticula. We describe our experience with tt-PCNL for caliceal diverticula, where patients typically go home the same day without any tube. Methods: We identified 42 patients (21 tt-PCNL, 21 PCNL with a NT and/or stent [t-PCNL]) with caliceal diverticular calculi undergoing PCNL from 2013 to 2024 in our prospectively maintained PCNL database. Demographics, stone characteristics, and intraoperative data were compared. Outcomes included final stone-free rate (SFR) using the absolute (0 mm) and relative (≤2 mm, 2.1-4 mm) fragment cutoffs, diverticular cavity resolution, 30-day complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and phone calls. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and continuous variables with Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Demographics and stone characteristics were similar between groups. SFRs were 94% for tt-PCNL and 90% for t-PCNL (p = 0.910) using CT-based criteria, with effective diverticular resolution in 90% and 100% of cases, respectively (p = 0.480). Complications, all Clavien-Dindo grade 1, occurred in four tt-PCNL patients and in one t-PCNL patient (p = 0.343). There were no statistically significant differences in readmission rates, 30-day complication and ED visit rates, or in the incidence of phone calls within 7 days. tt-PCNL patients were discharged same day, whereas t-PCNL required overnight observation. Conclusions: tt-PCNL is a safe effective option for caliceal diverticular stones, offering similar SFRs and safety outcomes compared with t-PCNL, but with shorter hospital stays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信