Susan Gong, Kavita Gupta, Christopher Connors, Ziv Savin, Vinay Durbhakula, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta
{"title":"全无管经皮肾镜取石术是治疗肾盏憩室结石安全有效的选择吗?","authors":"Susan Gong, Kavita Gupta, Christopher Connors, Ziv Savin, Vinay Durbhakula, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction and Objectives:</i></b> Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common treatment for caliceal diverticular calculi and provides excellent stone-free outcomes. Because of a concern for urinary stasis in the setting of a dilated nephrostomy tract, an indwelling ureteral stent and/or nephrostomy tube (NT) was traditionally left in the collecting system. The rationale for investigating totally tubeless PCNL (tt-PCNL) for the treatment of caliceal diverticula was to determine whether the advantages attributed to tt-PCNL for normal collecting system stones, such as shorter hospital stay and reduced morbidity, would extend to PCNL of caliceal diverticula. We describe our experience with tt-PCNL for caliceal diverticula, where patients typically go home the same day without any tube. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We identified 42 patients (21 tt-PCNL, 21 PCNL with a NT and/or stent [t-PCNL]) with caliceal diverticular calculi undergoing PCNL from 2013 to 2024 in our prospectively maintained PCNL database. Demographics, stone characteristics, and intraoperative data were compared. Outcomes included final stone-free rate (SFR) using the absolute (0 mm) and relative (≤2 mm, 2.1-4 mm) fragment cutoffs, diverticular cavity resolution, 30-day complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and phone calls. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and continuous variables with Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Demographics and stone characteristics were similar between groups. SFRs were 94% for tt-PCNL and 90% for t-PCNL (<i>p</i> = 0.910) using CT-based criteria, with effective diverticular resolution in 90% and 100% of cases, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.480). Complications, all Clavien-Dindo grade 1, occurred in four tt-PCNL patients and in one t-PCNL patient (<i>p</i> = 0.343). There were no statistically significant differences in readmission rates, 30-day complication and ED visit rates, or in the incidence of phone calls within 7 days. tt-PCNL patients were discharged same day, whereas t-PCNL required overnight observation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> tt-PCNL is a safe effective option for caliceal diverticular stones, offering similar SFRs and safety outcomes compared with t-PCNL, but with shorter hospital stays.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"880-887"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy a Safe and Efficacious Option for Caliceal Diverticular Calculi?\",\"authors\":\"Susan Gong, Kavita Gupta, Christopher Connors, Ziv Savin, Vinay Durbhakula, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/end.2024.0783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction and Objectives:</i></b> Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common treatment for caliceal diverticular calculi and provides excellent stone-free outcomes. Because of a concern for urinary stasis in the setting of a dilated nephrostomy tract, an indwelling ureteral stent and/or nephrostomy tube (NT) was traditionally left in the collecting system. The rationale for investigating totally tubeless PCNL (tt-PCNL) for the treatment of caliceal diverticula was to determine whether the advantages attributed to tt-PCNL for normal collecting system stones, such as shorter hospital stay and reduced morbidity, would extend to PCNL of caliceal diverticula. We describe our experience with tt-PCNL for caliceal diverticula, where patients typically go home the same day without any tube. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We identified 42 patients (21 tt-PCNL, 21 PCNL with a NT and/or stent [t-PCNL]) with caliceal diverticular calculi undergoing PCNL from 2013 to 2024 in our prospectively maintained PCNL database. Demographics, stone characteristics, and intraoperative data were compared. Outcomes included final stone-free rate (SFR) using the absolute (0 mm) and relative (≤2 mm, 2.1-4 mm) fragment cutoffs, diverticular cavity resolution, 30-day complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and phone calls. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and continuous variables with Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Demographics and stone characteristics were similar between groups. SFRs were 94% for tt-PCNL and 90% for t-PCNL (<i>p</i> = 0.910) using CT-based criteria, with effective diverticular resolution in 90% and 100% of cases, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.480). Complications, all Clavien-Dindo grade 1, occurred in four tt-PCNL patients and in one t-PCNL patient (<i>p</i> = 0.343). There were no statistically significant differences in readmission rates, 30-day complication and ED visit rates, or in the incidence of phone calls within 7 days. tt-PCNL patients were discharged same day, whereas t-PCNL required overnight observation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> tt-PCNL is a safe effective option for caliceal diverticular stones, offering similar SFRs and safety outcomes compared with t-PCNL, but with shorter hospital stays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"880-887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0783\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0783","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy a Safe and Efficacious Option for Caliceal Diverticular Calculi?
Introduction and Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common treatment for caliceal diverticular calculi and provides excellent stone-free outcomes. Because of a concern for urinary stasis in the setting of a dilated nephrostomy tract, an indwelling ureteral stent and/or nephrostomy tube (NT) was traditionally left in the collecting system. The rationale for investigating totally tubeless PCNL (tt-PCNL) for the treatment of caliceal diverticula was to determine whether the advantages attributed to tt-PCNL for normal collecting system stones, such as shorter hospital stay and reduced morbidity, would extend to PCNL of caliceal diverticula. We describe our experience with tt-PCNL for caliceal diverticula, where patients typically go home the same day without any tube. Methods: We identified 42 patients (21 tt-PCNL, 21 PCNL with a NT and/or stent [t-PCNL]) with caliceal diverticular calculi undergoing PCNL from 2013 to 2024 in our prospectively maintained PCNL database. Demographics, stone characteristics, and intraoperative data were compared. Outcomes included final stone-free rate (SFR) using the absolute (0 mm) and relative (≤2 mm, 2.1-4 mm) fragment cutoffs, diverticular cavity resolution, 30-day complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and phone calls. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and continuous variables with Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Demographics and stone characteristics were similar between groups. SFRs were 94% for tt-PCNL and 90% for t-PCNL (p = 0.910) using CT-based criteria, with effective diverticular resolution in 90% and 100% of cases, respectively (p = 0.480). Complications, all Clavien-Dindo grade 1, occurred in four tt-PCNL patients and in one t-PCNL patient (p = 0.343). There were no statistically significant differences in readmission rates, 30-day complication and ED visit rates, or in the incidence of phone calls within 7 days. tt-PCNL patients were discharged same day, whereas t-PCNL required overnight observation. Conclusions: tt-PCNL is a safe effective option for caliceal diverticular stones, offering similar SFRs and safety outcomes compared with t-PCNL, but with shorter hospital stays.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes.
The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation.
Journal of Endourology coverage includes:
The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions
Pioneering research articles
Controversial cases in endourology
Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos
Reviews and epochs in endourology
Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.