{"title":"干挥拍干预对击球速度和攻角的影响:核心干预因素分析。","authors":"Hanyao Li, Gang Cheng, Tianfeng Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1591520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigated the effects of dry swing intervention using differently weighted baseball bats on bat speed and attack angles during actual swing, simulating warm-up routines. Additionally, it explored core kinematic factors impacting subsequent bat speed and attack angles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-nine baseball players were allocated by stratified randomization into three groups-normal-weight, weight, and reduced-weight-within their respective age categories. Bat swing kinematics were collected using BLAST, while bodily kinematics were captured with Rebocap sensors. Differences between pre- and post-tests were analyzed, and core intervention factors were identified with an XGBoost model and SHAP-based additive explanations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant bat speed differences were found, but attack angles varied significantly in the normal-weight bat group for 12-14 year-olds (<i>p</i> = 0.027, ES = -0.315) and university players (<i>p</i> = 0.018, ES = 0.456). Core kinematic indicators included hip internal rotation (<i>p</i> = 0.007, ES = 0.990) and inclination angle (<i>p</i> = 0.023, ES = 0.184) showed significant differences, including and for the 12-14 age group using normal-weight bats, and hip external rotation (<i>p</i> = 0.045, ES = 1.619) for the 14-16 age group using weighted bats.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Post-test attack angles were impacted by intervention elevation and inclination angles, particularly for non-long-term bats. Adolescent athletes with shorter training term should avoid weight or reduced-weight bats for warm-up swings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1591520"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of dry swing intervention on bat speed and attack angle: an analysis of core intervention factors.\",\"authors\":\"Hanyao Li, Gang Cheng, Tianfeng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fspor.2025.1591520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigated the effects of dry swing intervention using differently weighted baseball bats on bat speed and attack angles during actual swing, simulating warm-up routines. Additionally, it explored core kinematic factors impacting subsequent bat speed and attack angles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-nine baseball players were allocated by stratified randomization into three groups-normal-weight, weight, and reduced-weight-within their respective age categories. Bat swing kinematics were collected using BLAST, while bodily kinematics were captured with Rebocap sensors. Differences between pre- and post-tests were analyzed, and core intervention factors were identified with an XGBoost model and SHAP-based additive explanations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant bat speed differences were found, but attack angles varied significantly in the normal-weight bat group for 12-14 year-olds (<i>p</i> = 0.027, ES = -0.315) and university players (<i>p</i> = 0.018, ES = 0.456). Core kinematic indicators included hip internal rotation (<i>p</i> = 0.007, ES = 0.990) and inclination angle (<i>p</i> = 0.023, ES = 0.184) showed significant differences, including and for the 12-14 age group using normal-weight bats, and hip external rotation (<i>p</i> = 0.045, ES = 1.619) for the 14-16 age group using weighted bats.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Post-test attack angles were impacted by intervention elevation and inclination angles, particularly for non-long-term bats. Adolescent athletes with shorter training term should avoid weight or reduced-weight bats for warm-up swings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1591520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213483/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1591520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1591520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本研究模拟热身练习,以不同重量的棒球棒进行干式挥棒干预,对实际挥棒过程中球棒速度和攻角的影响。此外,还探讨了影响后续击球速度和攻角的核心运动学因素。方法:69名棒球运动员按年龄分层随机分为正常体重组、体重组和减肥组。使用BLAST收集蝙蝠的摆动运动学,使用Rebocap传感器捕获蝙蝠的身体运动学。分析前后测试的差异,并利用XGBoost模型和基于shap的加性解释确定核心干预因素。结果:12 ~ 14岁青少年正常体重球棒组和大学生球棒组的球棒速度差异不显著(p = 0.027, ES = -0.315),攻角差异显著(p = 0.018, ES = 0.456)。核心运动指标包括髋关节内旋(p = 0.007, ES = 0.990)和倾角(p = 0.023, ES = 0.184),其中12-14岁年龄组使用正常重量球棒和14-16岁年龄组使用加权球棒髋外旋(p = 0.045, ES = 1.619)差异均有统计学意义。讨论:测试后的攻角受到干预仰角和倾斜角的影响,特别是对于非长期击球。训练时间较短的青少年运动员在热身挥拍时应避免使用重量或减轻重量的球拍。
Impacts of dry swing intervention on bat speed and attack angle: an analysis of core intervention factors.
Introduction: This study investigated the effects of dry swing intervention using differently weighted baseball bats on bat speed and attack angles during actual swing, simulating warm-up routines. Additionally, it explored core kinematic factors impacting subsequent bat speed and attack angles.
Methods: Sixty-nine baseball players were allocated by stratified randomization into three groups-normal-weight, weight, and reduced-weight-within their respective age categories. Bat swing kinematics were collected using BLAST, while bodily kinematics were captured with Rebocap sensors. Differences between pre- and post-tests were analyzed, and core intervention factors were identified with an XGBoost model and SHAP-based additive explanations.
Results: No significant bat speed differences were found, but attack angles varied significantly in the normal-weight bat group for 12-14 year-olds (p = 0.027, ES = -0.315) and university players (p = 0.018, ES = 0.456). Core kinematic indicators included hip internal rotation (p = 0.007, ES = 0.990) and inclination angle (p = 0.023, ES = 0.184) showed significant differences, including and for the 12-14 age group using normal-weight bats, and hip external rotation (p = 0.045, ES = 1.619) for the 14-16 age group using weighted bats.
Discussion: Post-test attack angles were impacted by intervention elevation and inclination angles, particularly for non-long-term bats. Adolescent athletes with shorter training term should avoid weight or reduced-weight bats for warm-up swings.