胸腔镜下修补婴儿先天性膈疝:双缝线入路,采用倒钩和不可吸收缝线。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-06-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2025.1612075
Xianhui Shang, Yuanmei Liu, Zhen Luo, Yingbo Li, Guangxu Zhou, Hongyang Tan, Kaiyi Mao
{"title":"胸腔镜下修补婴儿先天性膈疝:双缝线入路,采用倒钩和不可吸收缝线。","authors":"Xianhui Shang, Yuanmei Liu, Zhen Luo, Yingbo Li, Guangxu Zhou, Hongyang Tan, Kaiyi Mao","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1612075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of a dual suture technique combining barbed suture and non-absorbable needle suture in thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 48 pediatric patients who underwent thoracoscopic CDH repair at our institution between March 2012 and August 2024. Based on the suturing method used, patients were divided into an observation group (barbed suture combined with non-absorbable needle suture, <i>n</i> = 21) and a control group (non-absorbable needle suture alone, <i>n</i> = 27). Perioperative indicators including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, chest tube duration, postoperative hospital stay, and arterial blood gas values (pH, PO₂, PCO₂) before and after surgery were compared between groups. Postoperative complications such as suture loosening or hernia recurrence during follow-up were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were successfully completed thoracoscopically with no conversions to open surgery. Operative time was significantly shorter in the observation group compared to the control group [(37.2 ± 7.3) min vs. (65.8 ± 12.4) min]. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of blood loss, chest tube duration, postoperative hospital stay, or blood gas parameters (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). During a follow-up period of 6-24 months (median 12 months), no cases of suture loosening, hernia recurrence, or mortality were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dual suture technique combining barbed suture with non-absorbable needle suture is safe and effective in thoracoscopic repair of CDH in children. It significantly reduces operative time without increasing the risk of postoperative complications or recurrence. This technique is suitable for promotion in institutions with appropriate thoracoscopic expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1612075"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in infants: a dual-suture approach using barbed and non-absorbable sutures.\",\"authors\":\"Xianhui Shang, Yuanmei Liu, Zhen Luo, Yingbo Li, Guangxu Zhou, Hongyang Tan, Kaiyi Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fped.2025.1612075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of a dual suture technique combining barbed suture and non-absorbable needle suture in thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 48 pediatric patients who underwent thoracoscopic CDH repair at our institution between March 2012 and August 2024. Based on the suturing method used, patients were divided into an observation group (barbed suture combined with non-absorbable needle suture, <i>n</i> = 21) and a control group (non-absorbable needle suture alone, <i>n</i> = 27). Perioperative indicators including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, chest tube duration, postoperative hospital stay, and arterial blood gas values (pH, PO₂, PCO₂) before and after surgery were compared between groups. Postoperative complications such as suture loosening or hernia recurrence during follow-up were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were successfully completed thoracoscopically with no conversions to open surgery. Operative time was significantly shorter in the observation group compared to the control group [(37.2 ± 7.3) min vs. (65.8 ± 12.4) min]. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of blood loss, chest tube duration, postoperative hospital stay, or blood gas parameters (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). During a follow-up period of 6-24 months (median 12 months), no cases of suture loosening, hernia recurrence, or mortality were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dual suture technique combining barbed suture with non-absorbable needle suture is safe and effective in thoracoscopic repair of CDH in children. It significantly reduces operative time without increasing the risk of postoperative complications or recurrence. This technique is suitable for promotion in institutions with appropriate thoracoscopic expertise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1612075\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213511/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1612075\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1612075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨刺线缝合与不可吸收针缝合相结合的双重缝合技术在胸腔镜下治疗儿童先天性膈疝的可行性、安全性及临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2012年3月至2024年8月在我院行胸腔镜下CDH修复术的48例患儿。根据采用的缝合方法,将患者分为观察组(倒刺缝合联合不可吸收针缝合)21例和对照组(单独不可吸收针缝合)27例。围手术期指标包括手术时间、术中出血量、胸管时间、术后住院时间、术前、术后动脉血气值(pH、PO₂、PCO₂)进行比较。术后并发症,如缝线松动或疝复发随访期间也进行了评估。结果:所有手术均在胸腔镜下成功完成,无转开手术。观察组手术时间明显短于对照组[(37.2±7.3)min vs(65.8±12.4)min]。两组患者失血量、胸管时间、术后住院时间、血气参数差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。随访6-24个月(中位12个月),两组无缝线松动、疝复发、死亡病例。结论:双缝线技术结合倒钩缝合和不可吸收针缝合在儿童胸腔镜下修复CDH是安全有效的。在不增加术后并发症或复发风险的情况下,显著缩短手术时间。该技术适合在具有胸腔镜专业知识的机构推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in infants: a dual-suture approach using barbed and non-absorbable sutures.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of a dual suture technique combining barbed suture and non-absorbable needle suture in thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in children.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 48 pediatric patients who underwent thoracoscopic CDH repair at our institution between March 2012 and August 2024. Based on the suturing method used, patients were divided into an observation group (barbed suture combined with non-absorbable needle suture, n = 21) and a control group (non-absorbable needle suture alone, n = 27). Perioperative indicators including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, chest tube duration, postoperative hospital stay, and arterial blood gas values (pH, PO₂, PCO₂) before and after surgery were compared between groups. Postoperative complications such as suture loosening or hernia recurrence during follow-up were also assessed.

Results: All procedures were successfully completed thoracoscopically with no conversions to open surgery. Operative time was significantly shorter in the observation group compared to the control group [(37.2 ± 7.3) min vs. (65.8 ± 12.4) min]. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of blood loss, chest tube duration, postoperative hospital stay, or blood gas parameters (all P > 0.05). During a follow-up period of 6-24 months (median 12 months), no cases of suture loosening, hernia recurrence, or mortality were observed in either group.

Conclusion: The dual suture technique combining barbed suture with non-absorbable needle suture is safe and effective in thoracoscopic repair of CDH in children. It significantly reduces operative time without increasing the risk of postoperative complications or recurrence. This technique is suitable for promotion in institutions with appropriate thoracoscopic expertise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信