持续暴露于局部青光眼药物的患者,强脉冲光治疗顽固性睑板腺功能障碍的一年结果:一项比较研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eye Pub Date : 2025-07-02 DOI:10.1038/s41433-025-03886-z
Chi-Chun Yang, Yu-Chieh Ko, De-Kuang Hwang, Meng-Jou Chen, Nai-Wen Fan
{"title":"持续暴露于局部青光眼药物的患者,强脉冲光治疗顽固性睑板腺功能障碍的一年结果:一项比较研究。","authors":"Chi-Chun Yang, Yu-Chieh Ko, De-Kuang Hwang, Meng-Jou Chen, Nai-Wen Fan","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-03886-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the one-year effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) for refractory meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) between patients treated with and without topical hypotensive agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 21 MGD eyes of 21 glaucoma patients (age, 64.38 ± 13.74 years) and 21 MGD eyes of 21 non-glaucoma patients (age, 63.90 ± 13.50 years). Both arms received IPL therapy with meibomian gland expression (MGX). Propensity score matching ensured baseline comparability. Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire, tear film breakup time (TBUT), lid telangiectasia, corneal staining, meibum quality and expressibility were assessed at baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvement in SPEED score and TBUT at 9 months, but only the non-glaucoma group maintained these improvements at 12 months (P < 0.01). While meibum quality improved in both groups at 12 months, significant improvement in lid telangiectasia and meibum expressibility was observed only in the non-glaucoma group. At 12 months, the non-glaucoma group showed less lid telangiectasia than the glaucoma group (P = 0.009). No other intergroup differences were found in other outcomes. Neither group showed significant improvement in corneal staining throughout the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPL therapy is effective for treating refractory MGD in both glaucoma and non-glaucoma patients, with significant improvements in dry eye symptoms, tear film stability and meibum quality. However, patients on continuous hypotensive agents showed less improvement in lid telangiectasia at 12 months, suggesting that chronic hypotensive medication use may affect treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-year outcome of intense pulsed light therapy for refractory meibomian gland dysfunction in patients continuously exposed to topical glaucoma medications: a comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Chi-Chun Yang, Yu-Chieh Ko, De-Kuang Hwang, Meng-Jou Chen, Nai-Wen Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41433-025-03886-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the one-year effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) for refractory meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) between patients treated with and without topical hypotensive agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 21 MGD eyes of 21 glaucoma patients (age, 64.38 ± 13.74 years) and 21 MGD eyes of 21 non-glaucoma patients (age, 63.90 ± 13.50 years). Both arms received IPL therapy with meibomian gland expression (MGX). Propensity score matching ensured baseline comparability. Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire, tear film breakup time (TBUT), lid telangiectasia, corneal staining, meibum quality and expressibility were assessed at baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvement in SPEED score and TBUT at 9 months, but only the non-glaucoma group maintained these improvements at 12 months (P < 0.01). While meibum quality improved in both groups at 12 months, significant improvement in lid telangiectasia and meibum expressibility was observed only in the non-glaucoma group. At 12 months, the non-glaucoma group showed less lid telangiectasia than the glaucoma group (P = 0.009). No other intergroup differences were found in other outcomes. Neither group showed significant improvement in corneal staining throughout the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPL therapy is effective for treating refractory MGD in both glaucoma and non-glaucoma patients, with significant improvements in dry eye symptoms, tear film stability and meibum quality. However, patients on continuous hypotensive agents showed less improvement in lid telangiectasia at 12 months, suggesting that chronic hypotensive medication use may affect treatment efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03886-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03886-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评价强脉冲光(IPL)治疗顽固性睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)患者使用和不使用局部降压药的一年疗效。方法:回顾性研究21例青光眼患者21只MGD眼(年龄64.38±13.74岁)和21例非青光眼患者21只MGD眼(年龄63.90±13.50岁)。两组均接受骨髓腺表达(MGX)的IPL治疗。倾向评分匹配确保了基线的可比性。在基线、治疗后3、6、9、12个月分别评估标准患者眼干性评估问卷(SPEED)、泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、眼睑毛细血管扩张、角膜染色、细胞脂质量和表达性。结果:两组在9个月时SPEED评分和TBUT均有显著改善,但只有非青光眼组在12个月时保持了这些改善(P)结论:IPL治疗对青光眼和非青光眼患者的难治性MGD均有效,干眼症状、泪膜稳定性和细胞质量均有显著改善。然而,持续使用降压药的患者在12个月时眼睑毛细血管扩张的改善较少,这表明长期使用降压药可能会影响治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One-year outcome of intense pulsed light therapy for refractory meibomian gland dysfunction in patients continuously exposed to topical glaucoma medications: a comparative study.

Background: To evaluate the one-year effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) for refractory meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) between patients treated with and without topical hypotensive agents.

Methods: This retrospective study included 21 MGD eyes of 21 glaucoma patients (age, 64.38 ± 13.74 years) and 21 MGD eyes of 21 non-glaucoma patients (age, 63.90 ± 13.50 years). Both arms received IPL therapy with meibomian gland expression (MGX). Propensity score matching ensured baseline comparability. Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire, tear film breakup time (TBUT), lid telangiectasia, corneal staining, meibum quality and expressibility were assessed at baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months post-treatment.

Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in SPEED score and TBUT at 9 months, but only the non-glaucoma group maintained these improvements at 12 months (P < 0.01). While meibum quality improved in both groups at 12 months, significant improvement in lid telangiectasia and meibum expressibility was observed only in the non-glaucoma group. At 12 months, the non-glaucoma group showed less lid telangiectasia than the glaucoma group (P = 0.009). No other intergroup differences were found in other outcomes. Neither group showed significant improvement in corneal staining throughout the follow-up period.

Conclusions: IPL therapy is effective for treating refractory MGD in both glaucoma and non-glaucoma patients, with significant improvements in dry eye symptoms, tear film stability and meibum quality. However, patients on continuous hypotensive agents showed less improvement in lid telangiectasia at 12 months, suggesting that chronic hypotensive medication use may affect treatment efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eye
Eye 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye seeks to provide the international practising ophthalmologist with high quality articles, of academic rigour, on the latest global clinical and laboratory based research. Its core aim is to advance the science and practice of ophthalmology with the latest clinical- and scientific-based research. Whilst principally aimed at the practising clinician, the journal contains material of interest to a wider readership including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science worldwide. Eye is the official journal of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Eye encourages the submission of original articles covering all aspects of ophthalmology including: external eye disease; oculo-plastic surgery; orbital and lacrimal disease; ocular surface and corneal disorders; paediatric ophthalmology and strabismus; glaucoma; medical and surgical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; cataract and refractive surgery; ocular oncology; ophthalmic pathology; ophthalmic genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信