Chi-Chun Yang, Yu-Chieh Ko, De-Kuang Hwang, Meng-Jou Chen, Nai-Wen Fan
{"title":"持续暴露于局部青光眼药物的患者,强脉冲光治疗顽固性睑板腺功能障碍的一年结果:一项比较研究。","authors":"Chi-Chun Yang, Yu-Chieh Ko, De-Kuang Hwang, Meng-Jou Chen, Nai-Wen Fan","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-03886-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the one-year effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) for refractory meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) between patients treated with and without topical hypotensive agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 21 MGD eyes of 21 glaucoma patients (age, 64.38 ± 13.74 years) and 21 MGD eyes of 21 non-glaucoma patients (age, 63.90 ± 13.50 years). Both arms received IPL therapy with meibomian gland expression (MGX). Propensity score matching ensured baseline comparability. Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire, tear film breakup time (TBUT), lid telangiectasia, corneal staining, meibum quality and expressibility were assessed at baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvement in SPEED score and TBUT at 9 months, but only the non-glaucoma group maintained these improvements at 12 months (P < 0.01). While meibum quality improved in both groups at 12 months, significant improvement in lid telangiectasia and meibum expressibility was observed only in the non-glaucoma group. At 12 months, the non-glaucoma group showed less lid telangiectasia than the glaucoma group (P = 0.009). No other intergroup differences were found in other outcomes. Neither group showed significant improvement in corneal staining throughout the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPL therapy is effective for treating refractory MGD in both glaucoma and non-glaucoma patients, with significant improvements in dry eye symptoms, tear film stability and meibum quality. However, patients on continuous hypotensive agents showed less improvement in lid telangiectasia at 12 months, suggesting that chronic hypotensive medication use may affect treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-year outcome of intense pulsed light therapy for refractory meibomian gland dysfunction in patients continuously exposed to topical glaucoma medications: a comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Chi-Chun Yang, Yu-Chieh Ko, De-Kuang Hwang, Meng-Jou Chen, Nai-Wen Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41433-025-03886-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the one-year effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) for refractory meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) between patients treated with and without topical hypotensive agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 21 MGD eyes of 21 glaucoma patients (age, 64.38 ± 13.74 years) and 21 MGD eyes of 21 non-glaucoma patients (age, 63.90 ± 13.50 years). Both arms received IPL therapy with meibomian gland expression (MGX). Propensity score matching ensured baseline comparability. Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire, tear film breakup time (TBUT), lid telangiectasia, corneal staining, meibum quality and expressibility were assessed at baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvement in SPEED score and TBUT at 9 months, but only the non-glaucoma group maintained these improvements at 12 months (P < 0.01). While meibum quality improved in both groups at 12 months, significant improvement in lid telangiectasia and meibum expressibility was observed only in the non-glaucoma group. At 12 months, the non-glaucoma group showed less lid telangiectasia than the glaucoma group (P = 0.009). No other intergroup differences were found in other outcomes. Neither group showed significant improvement in corneal staining throughout the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPL therapy is effective for treating refractory MGD in both glaucoma and non-glaucoma patients, with significant improvements in dry eye symptoms, tear film stability and meibum quality. However, patients on continuous hypotensive agents showed less improvement in lid telangiectasia at 12 months, suggesting that chronic hypotensive medication use may affect treatment efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03886-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03886-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
One-year outcome of intense pulsed light therapy for refractory meibomian gland dysfunction in patients continuously exposed to topical glaucoma medications: a comparative study.
Background: To evaluate the one-year effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) for refractory meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) between patients treated with and without topical hypotensive agents.
Methods: This retrospective study included 21 MGD eyes of 21 glaucoma patients (age, 64.38 ± 13.74 years) and 21 MGD eyes of 21 non-glaucoma patients (age, 63.90 ± 13.50 years). Both arms received IPL therapy with meibomian gland expression (MGX). Propensity score matching ensured baseline comparability. Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire, tear film breakup time (TBUT), lid telangiectasia, corneal staining, meibum quality and expressibility were assessed at baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months post-treatment.
Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in SPEED score and TBUT at 9 months, but only the non-glaucoma group maintained these improvements at 12 months (P < 0.01). While meibum quality improved in both groups at 12 months, significant improvement in lid telangiectasia and meibum expressibility was observed only in the non-glaucoma group. At 12 months, the non-glaucoma group showed less lid telangiectasia than the glaucoma group (P = 0.009). No other intergroup differences were found in other outcomes. Neither group showed significant improvement in corneal staining throughout the follow-up period.
Conclusions: IPL therapy is effective for treating refractory MGD in both glaucoma and non-glaucoma patients, with significant improvements in dry eye symptoms, tear film stability and meibum quality. However, patients on continuous hypotensive agents showed less improvement in lid telangiectasia at 12 months, suggesting that chronic hypotensive medication use may affect treatment efficacy.
期刊介绍:
Eye seeks to provide the international practising ophthalmologist with high quality articles, of academic rigour, on the latest global clinical and laboratory based research. Its core aim is to advance the science and practice of ophthalmology with the latest clinical- and scientific-based research. Whilst principally aimed at the practising clinician, the journal contains material of interest to a wider readership including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science worldwide. Eye is the official journal of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.
Eye encourages the submission of original articles covering all aspects of ophthalmology including: external eye disease; oculo-plastic surgery; orbital and lacrimal disease; ocular surface and corneal disorders; paediatric ophthalmology and strabismus; glaucoma; medical and surgical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; cataract and refractive surgery; ocular oncology; ophthalmic pathology; ophthalmic genetics.