将口袋阴道镜纳入肯尼亚西部护士主导的宫颈癌筛查项目的可行性。

IF 1.3 Q4 ONCOLOGY
ecancermedicalscience Pub Date : 2025-06-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2025.1925
Sergine Cindy M Zeufack, Jackton Omoto, Antony Owaya, Everlyn Adoyo, Mercy Rop, Cirillus Ogollah Osongo, Lisa Rahangdale, Craig R Cohen, Chemtai Mungo
{"title":"将口袋阴道镜纳入肯尼亚西部护士主导的宫颈癌筛查项目的可行性。","authors":"Sergine Cindy M Zeufack, Jackton Omoto, Antony Owaya, Everlyn Adoyo, Mercy Rop, Cirillus Ogollah Osongo, Lisa Rahangdale, Craig R Cohen, Chemtai Mungo","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2025.1925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of handheld colposcopy in nurse-led cervical cancer screening programs could enhance screening quality and diagnostic accuracy, especially in high-burden regions like sub-Saharan Africa. This study assessed the feasibility of using the Pocket colposcope (Calla Health Foundation, Durham, NC) among healthcare providers in western Kenya. Feasibility was defined in terms of acceptability and image quality. A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving healthcare providers from three clinics offering cervical cancer screening. These providers used the Pocket colposcope more than once within 2 months of the survey. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore provider experiences and the device's acceptability, which was measured using Likert scale questions based on Sekhon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). This framework evaluates affective attitude, burden, ethicality, perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, self-efficacy and opportunity cost. Additionally, expert gynecologists assessed the quality of cervical images from visual inspection with acetic acid and/or human papillomavirus-positive patients (<i>n</i> = 123), rating them on a scale of 1 to 3. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using STATA 18.0 and Dedoose 9.0.17, respectively. Among the eight providers interviewed, including five nurses, the average experience in cervical cancer screening was 4.2 years. The Pocket colposcope received a mean acceptability score of 4.18 (SD = 0.27) out of five based on the seven TFA constructs. Qualitative findings highlighted positive aspects, such as better cervix visualisation, improved post-treatment monitoring, easier external consultations and enhanced patient education. However, challenges incl‑uded camera and software issues and limited personnel for documentation. Image quality was rated 2.23 out of 3, with fair interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa 0.36, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The study concluded that the Pocket colposcope is acceptable in nurse-led cervical cancer screening programs but emphasised the need for improvements in image quality and technology reliability. Expanding training could further enhance its utilisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1925"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12221255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of incorporating the Pocket colposcope into nurse-led cervical cancer screening programs in Western Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Sergine Cindy M Zeufack, Jackton Omoto, Antony Owaya, Everlyn Adoyo, Mercy Rop, Cirillus Ogollah Osongo, Lisa Rahangdale, Craig R Cohen, Chemtai Mungo\",\"doi\":\"10.3332/ecancer.2025.1925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of handheld colposcopy in nurse-led cervical cancer screening programs could enhance screening quality and diagnostic accuracy, especially in high-burden regions like sub-Saharan Africa. This study assessed the feasibility of using the Pocket colposcope (Calla Health Foundation, Durham, NC) among healthcare providers in western Kenya. Feasibility was defined in terms of acceptability and image quality. A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving healthcare providers from three clinics offering cervical cancer screening. These providers used the Pocket colposcope more than once within 2 months of the survey. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore provider experiences and the device's acceptability, which was measured using Likert scale questions based on Sekhon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). This framework evaluates affective attitude, burden, ethicality, perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, self-efficacy and opportunity cost. Additionally, expert gynecologists assessed the quality of cervical images from visual inspection with acetic acid and/or human papillomavirus-positive patients (<i>n</i> = 123), rating them on a scale of 1 to 3. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using STATA 18.0 and Dedoose 9.0.17, respectively. Among the eight providers interviewed, including five nurses, the average experience in cervical cancer screening was 4.2 years. The Pocket colposcope received a mean acceptability score of 4.18 (SD = 0.27) out of five based on the seven TFA constructs. Qualitative findings highlighted positive aspects, such as better cervix visualisation, improved post-treatment monitoring, easier external consultations and enhanced patient education. However, challenges incl‑uded camera and software issues and limited personnel for documentation. Image quality was rated 2.23 out of 3, with fair interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa 0.36, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The study concluded that the Pocket colposcope is acceptable in nurse-led cervical cancer screening programs but emphasised the need for improvements in image quality and technology reliability. Expanding training could further enhance its utilisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ecancermedicalscience\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"1925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12221255/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ecancermedicalscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2025.1925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2025.1925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在护士主导的宫颈癌筛查项目中使用手持式阴道镜检查可以提高筛查质量和诊断准确性,特别是在撒哈拉以南非洲等高负担地区。本研究评估了在肯尼亚西部医疗保健提供者中使用口袋阴道镜(Calla健康基金会,北卡罗来纳州达勒姆)的可行性。可行性是根据可接受性和图像质量来定义的。采用混合方法,涉及来自三家提供宫颈癌筛查的诊所的保健提供者。这些服务提供者在调查后的2个月内使用过一次以上的便携式阴道镜。进行半结构化访谈以探索提供者经验和设备的可接受性,使用基于Sekhon可接受性理论框架(TFA)的李克特量表问题进行测量。该框架评估了情感态度、负担、伦理、感知有效性、干预一致性、自我效能和机会成本。此外,妇科专家对醋酸和/或人乳头瘤病毒阳性患者(n = 123)目视检查的宫颈图像质量进行了评估,并对其进行了1至3级的评分。观察员间协议使用Cohen的kappa进行评估。定量和定性数据分别采用STATA 18.0和Dedoose 9.0.17进行分析。在接受采访的8名提供者中,包括5名护士,宫颈癌筛查的平均经验为4.2年。基于7个TFA结构,Pocket阴道镜的平均可接受性评分为4.18 (SD = 0.27)。定性研究结果强调了积极的方面,如更好的子宫颈可视化、改进的治疗后监测、更容易的外部咨询和加强患者教育。然而,挑战包括相机和软件问题以及编制文件的人员有限。图像质量被评为2.23(满分为3分),观察者之间的一致性很好(Cohen’s kappa 0.36, p < 0.001)。该研究得出结论,口袋阴道镜在护士主导的宫颈癌筛查项目中是可以接受的,但强调需要提高图像质量和技术可靠性。扩大培训可以进一步提高其利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of incorporating the Pocket colposcope into nurse-led cervical cancer screening programs in Western Kenya.

The use of handheld colposcopy in nurse-led cervical cancer screening programs could enhance screening quality and diagnostic accuracy, especially in high-burden regions like sub-Saharan Africa. This study assessed the feasibility of using the Pocket colposcope (Calla Health Foundation, Durham, NC) among healthcare providers in western Kenya. Feasibility was defined in terms of acceptability and image quality. A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving healthcare providers from three clinics offering cervical cancer screening. These providers used the Pocket colposcope more than once within 2 months of the survey. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore provider experiences and the device's acceptability, which was measured using Likert scale questions based on Sekhon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). This framework evaluates affective attitude, burden, ethicality, perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, self-efficacy and opportunity cost. Additionally, expert gynecologists assessed the quality of cervical images from visual inspection with acetic acid and/or human papillomavirus-positive patients (n = 123), rating them on a scale of 1 to 3. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using STATA 18.0 and Dedoose 9.0.17, respectively. Among the eight providers interviewed, including five nurses, the average experience in cervical cancer screening was 4.2 years. The Pocket colposcope received a mean acceptability score of 4.18 (SD = 0.27) out of five based on the seven TFA constructs. Qualitative findings highlighted positive aspects, such as better cervix visualisation, improved post-treatment monitoring, easier external consultations and enhanced patient education. However, challenges incl‑uded camera and software issues and limited personnel for documentation. Image quality was rated 2.23 out of 3, with fair interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa 0.36, p < 0.001). The study concluded that the Pocket colposcope is acceptable in nurse-led cervical cancer screening programs but emphasised the need for improvements in image quality and technology reliability. Expanding training could further enhance its utilisation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信