{"title":"使用钙黄素- am成像方法量化角膜内皮移植术中角膜内皮细胞的损伤。","authors":"Sung Lee, Ching Yuan, Peter Bedard, Joshua H Hou","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>(1) To compare total endothelial cell damage from loading and ejection of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts through Straiko and Lions World Vision Institute (LWVI) glass cannulas. (2) To isolate and quantify endothelial cell damage from loading or ejection alone in Straiko tubes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DMEK grafts were peeled, stained with Calcein-AM (CAM), and imaged under fluorescence microscopy to evaluate baseline endothelial damage. Grafts were then loaded and ejected from Straiko and LWVI glass cannulas, and reimaged. Loss of CAM fluorescence signal was evaluated to calculate change in Area of Cell Damage (ACD). ACD changes were compared between Straiko and LWVI cannulas. Custom-made Straiko \"half-tubes,\" consisting of only the loading or ejection end of a Straiko tube, were used to isolate graft loading from ejection, and CAM-based ACD was again assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Loading and ejection resulted in a significant increase in ACD for both Straiko (4.88% ± 0.53%) and LWVI (4.22% ± 0.57%) cannulas, but this was not statistically different between cannulas (P = 0.42). For Straiko half-tubes, ejection alone (3.08% ± 0.31%) resulted in a significantly greater increase in ACD compared with loading alone (1.38% ± 0.36%) (P = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ejection of DMEK grafts through a Straiko tube causes more endothelial cell damage than loading. Loading and ejection of DMEK grafts through Straiko and LWVI tubes were associated with similar endothelial cell damage. Bore size alone cannot explain these results. The overall damage, measured using CAM, was lower than previously reported studies that relied on different methods for quantifying damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage During Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Loading and Ejection Using a Calcein-AM Imaging Method.\",\"authors\":\"Sung Lee, Ching Yuan, Peter Bedard, Joshua H Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>(1) To compare total endothelial cell damage from loading and ejection of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts through Straiko and Lions World Vision Institute (LWVI) glass cannulas. (2) To isolate and quantify endothelial cell damage from loading or ejection alone in Straiko tubes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DMEK grafts were peeled, stained with Calcein-AM (CAM), and imaged under fluorescence microscopy to evaluate baseline endothelial damage. Grafts were then loaded and ejected from Straiko and LWVI glass cannulas, and reimaged. Loss of CAM fluorescence signal was evaluated to calculate change in Area of Cell Damage (ACD). ACD changes were compared between Straiko and LWVI cannulas. Custom-made Straiko \\\"half-tubes,\\\" consisting of only the loading or ejection end of a Straiko tube, were used to isolate graft loading from ejection, and CAM-based ACD was again assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Loading and ejection resulted in a significant increase in ACD for both Straiko (4.88% ± 0.53%) and LWVI (4.22% ± 0.57%) cannulas, but this was not statistically different between cannulas (P = 0.42). For Straiko half-tubes, ejection alone (3.08% ± 0.31%) resulted in a significantly greater increase in ACD compared with loading alone (1.38% ± 0.36%) (P = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ejection of DMEK grafts through a Straiko tube causes more endothelial cell damage than loading. Loading and ejection of DMEK grafts through Straiko and LWVI tubes were associated with similar endothelial cell damage. Bore size alone cannot explain these results. The overall damage, measured using CAM, was lower than previously reported studies that relied on different methods for quantifying damage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornea\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003925\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003925","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:(1)比较通过Straiko和LWVI玻璃套管对Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)移植物的负荷和射血对内皮细胞的总损伤。(2)在Straiko管中分离和定量内皮细胞损伤。方法:DMEK移植物去皮,Calcein-AM (CAM)染色,荧光显微镜下成像,评估基线内皮损伤。然后将移植物从Straiko和LWVI玻璃套管中取出,并重新成像。评估CAM荧光信号的损失,计算细胞损伤面积(Area of Cell Damage, ACD)的变化。比较Straiko和LWVI套管的ACD变化。定制的Straiko“半管”仅由Straiko管的加载端或弹出端组成,用于分离移植物加载和弹出端,并再次评估基于cam的ACD。结果:加载和弹射导致Straiko套管(4.88%±0.53%)和LWVI套管(4.22%±0.57%)的ACD显著增加,但两种套管间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.42)。对于Straiko半管,单独弹射(3.08%±0.31%)导致ACD显著高于单独加载(1.38%±0.36%)(P = 0.004)。结论:DMEK移植物经Straiko管喷射比负荷更能引起内皮细胞损伤。通过Straiko和LWVI管装载和射出DMEK移植物与内皮细胞损伤相似。单凭钻孔尺寸不能解释这些结果。使用CAM测量的总体损害比以前报道的依赖于不同方法量化损害的研究要低。
Quantifying Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage During Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Loading and Ejection Using a Calcein-AM Imaging Method.
Purpose: (1) To compare total endothelial cell damage from loading and ejection of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts through Straiko and Lions World Vision Institute (LWVI) glass cannulas. (2) To isolate and quantify endothelial cell damage from loading or ejection alone in Straiko tubes.
Methods: DMEK grafts were peeled, stained with Calcein-AM (CAM), and imaged under fluorescence microscopy to evaluate baseline endothelial damage. Grafts were then loaded and ejected from Straiko and LWVI glass cannulas, and reimaged. Loss of CAM fluorescence signal was evaluated to calculate change in Area of Cell Damage (ACD). ACD changes were compared between Straiko and LWVI cannulas. Custom-made Straiko "half-tubes," consisting of only the loading or ejection end of a Straiko tube, were used to isolate graft loading from ejection, and CAM-based ACD was again assessed.
Results: Loading and ejection resulted in a significant increase in ACD for both Straiko (4.88% ± 0.53%) and LWVI (4.22% ± 0.57%) cannulas, but this was not statistically different between cannulas (P = 0.42). For Straiko half-tubes, ejection alone (3.08% ± 0.31%) resulted in a significantly greater increase in ACD compared with loading alone (1.38% ± 0.36%) (P = 0.004).
Conclusions: Ejection of DMEK grafts through a Straiko tube causes more endothelial cell damage than loading. Loading and ejection of DMEK grafts through Straiko and LWVI tubes were associated with similar endothelial cell damage. Bore size alone cannot explain these results. The overall damage, measured using CAM, was lower than previously reported studies that relied on different methods for quantifying damage.
期刊介绍:
For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references.
Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.