评估埃塞俄比亚西南部地区消除疟疾的蚊幼虫源管理做法:一种混合研究设计方法。

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Bezuayehu Alemayehu, Tadesse Gebremedhin, Mathewos Alemu Gebremichael, Wondwossen Niguse, Girma Mamo Zegene, Ephrem Negeri, Ibrahim Temam, Haile Zewude, Tamerat Bogale, Endale Sahile, Erkyehun Pawlos Shash
{"title":"评估埃塞俄比亚西南部地区消除疟疾的蚊幼虫源管理做法:一种混合研究设计方法。","authors":"Bezuayehu Alemayehu, Tadesse Gebremedhin, Mathewos Alemu Gebremichael, Wondwossen Niguse, Girma Mamo Zegene, Ephrem Negeri, Ibrahim Temam, Haile Zewude, Tamerat Bogale, Endale Sahile, Erkyehun Pawlos Shash","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07349-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Malaria is the most significant public health challenge. This study aimed to assess the status of the mosquito LMS practices for malaria elimination in South West Ethiopia. A mixed study designs were used to collect data with pre-tested questionnaires. The data were analyzed on a logistic regression model. Qualitative data were analyzed using Quirkos and results were presented in a thematic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 19.20% of households had good practice of LSM practice. The majority, 80.09% of households, had poor practices of LSM among a total of 1,552 households. More than half, 58.1% of households had a favorable attitude toward the LSM practice. Those participants with good knowledge of LSM practices had significantly 3.49 times higher odds of engaging in LSM practices compared to those with poor knowledge. Similarly, households with good knowledge of malaria had significantly 8.01 times higher odds of good LSM practices. Residents with favorable attitudes towards LSM practices had statistically 2.58 times higher odds of engaging in good LSM practices, but there were barriers to LSM practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are poor LSM practices for malaria elimination that need behavioral change communications and promoting LSM, and providing training on changing attitudes, for prompt intervention, to reduce mosquitoes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of mosquito larval source management practices for malaria elimination in South West Ethiopia people regional state: a mixed study design approach.\",\"authors\":\"Bezuayehu Alemayehu, Tadesse Gebremedhin, Mathewos Alemu Gebremichael, Wondwossen Niguse, Girma Mamo Zegene, Ephrem Negeri, Ibrahim Temam, Haile Zewude, Tamerat Bogale, Endale Sahile, Erkyehun Pawlos Shash\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13104-025-07349-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Malaria is the most significant public health challenge. This study aimed to assess the status of the mosquito LMS practices for malaria elimination in South West Ethiopia. A mixed study designs were used to collect data with pre-tested questionnaires. The data were analyzed on a logistic regression model. Qualitative data were analyzed using Quirkos and results were presented in a thematic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 19.20% of households had good practice of LSM practice. The majority, 80.09% of households, had poor practices of LSM among a total of 1,552 households. More than half, 58.1% of households had a favorable attitude toward the LSM practice. Those participants with good knowledge of LSM practices had significantly 3.49 times higher odds of engaging in LSM practices compared to those with poor knowledge. Similarly, households with good knowledge of malaria had significantly 8.01 times higher odds of good LSM practices. Residents with favorable attitudes towards LSM practices had statistically 2.58 times higher odds of engaging in good LSM practices, but there were barriers to LSM practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are poor LSM practices for malaria elimination that need behavioral change communications and promoting LSM, and providing training on changing attitudes, for prompt intervention, to reduce mosquitoes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225124/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07349-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07349-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:疟疾是最重大的公共卫生挑战。本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚西南部蚊子LMS消除疟疾的现状。采用混合研究设计,通过预测问卷收集数据。采用logistic回归模型对数据进行分析。使用Quirkos对定性数据进行分析,并在专题中介绍结果。结果:约19.20%的家庭良好地执行了LSM。在总共1552个住户中,大多数住户(80.09%)的LSM做法不佳。超过一半(58.1%)的家庭对LSM的做法持赞成态度。具有良好LSM实践知识的参与者参与LSM实践的几率是知识贫乏者的3.49倍。同样,对疟疾有良好了解的家庭采用良好LSM做法的几率显著高出8.01倍。对LSM实践持积极态度的居民参与良好LSM实践的几率是统计上的2.58倍,但LSM实践存在障碍。结论:消除疟疾的LSM实践较差,需要进行行为改变沟通,推广LSM,并提供态度转变培训,以便及时干预,减少蚊虫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of mosquito larval source management practices for malaria elimination in South West Ethiopia people regional state: a mixed study design approach.

Objective: Malaria is the most significant public health challenge. This study aimed to assess the status of the mosquito LMS practices for malaria elimination in South West Ethiopia. A mixed study designs were used to collect data with pre-tested questionnaires. The data were analyzed on a logistic regression model. Qualitative data were analyzed using Quirkos and results were presented in a thematic.

Results: About 19.20% of households had good practice of LSM practice. The majority, 80.09% of households, had poor practices of LSM among a total of 1,552 households. More than half, 58.1% of households had a favorable attitude toward the LSM practice. Those participants with good knowledge of LSM practices had significantly 3.49 times higher odds of engaging in LSM practices compared to those with poor knowledge. Similarly, households with good knowledge of malaria had significantly 8.01 times higher odds of good LSM practices. Residents with favorable attitudes towards LSM practices had statistically 2.58 times higher odds of engaging in good LSM practices, but there were barriers to LSM practices.

Conclusions: There are poor LSM practices for malaria elimination that need behavioral change communications and promoting LSM, and providing training on changing attitudes, for prompt intervention, to reduce mosquitoes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信