使用机器学习算法预测加纳一家地区医院孕妇剖宫产。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frederick Osei Owusu, Helena Addai-Manu, Esther Serwah Agbedinu, Emmanuel Konadu, Lydia Asenso, Mercy Addae, Joseph Osarfo, Brenda Abena Ampah, Douglas Aninng Opoku
{"title":"使用机器学习算法预测加纳一家地区医院孕妇剖宫产。","authors":"Frederick Osei Owusu, Helena Addai-Manu, Esther Serwah Agbedinu, Emmanuel Konadu, Lydia Asenso, Mercy Addae, Joseph Osarfo, Brenda Abena Ampah, Douglas Aninng Opoku","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07716-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Machine learning algorithms may contribute to improving maternal and child health, including determining the suitability of caesarean section (CS) births in low-resource countries. Despite machine learning algorithms offering a more robust approach to predicting/diagnosing a health-related problem, research on their use in determining CS birth is scarce in sub-Saharan Africa. This study therefore aimed to compare the performance of five machine learning techniques in predicting CS birth among pregnant women in a district hospital in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study that used retrospective data from medical records of pregnant women who delivered at a district hospital in Ghana. A clinical decision support system for predicting CS birth was developed using five machine learning techniques including logistic regression, Support Vector Machines, Naïve Bayes, Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting. Measures such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) were used for the model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 2310 deliveries, the prevalence of CS birth was 37.7% with previous CS being the most prevalent indication. The Random Forest model showed the best performance for predicting CS birth with an accuracy of 0.981, recall of 0.994, F1 score of 0.985 and an AUC-ROC of 0.988. The Naïve Bayes model followed with an accuracy of 0.965, recall of 0.967, F1 score of 0.972 and AUC-ROC of 0.986. The top five most important predictors proved to be diastolic (0.0906) and systolic (0.0848) blood pressures, maternal age (0.0756), previous CS (0.0641) and marital status (0.0400).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that although all five machine learning techniques had good performance in determining CS births, the Random Forest model was superior to all the others in predicting them. This finding suggests that machine learning could help identify at-risk pregnant women for CS births, potentially supporting early interventions and informing policies in maternal healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"690"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of caesarean section birth using machine learning algorithms among pregnant women in a district hospital in Ghana.\",\"authors\":\"Frederick Osei Owusu, Helena Addai-Manu, Esther Serwah Agbedinu, Emmanuel Konadu, Lydia Asenso, Mercy Addae, Joseph Osarfo, Brenda Abena Ampah, Douglas Aninng Opoku\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07716-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Machine learning algorithms may contribute to improving maternal and child health, including determining the suitability of caesarean section (CS) births in low-resource countries. Despite machine learning algorithms offering a more robust approach to predicting/diagnosing a health-related problem, research on their use in determining CS birth is scarce in sub-Saharan Africa. This study therefore aimed to compare the performance of five machine learning techniques in predicting CS birth among pregnant women in a district hospital in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study that used retrospective data from medical records of pregnant women who delivered at a district hospital in Ghana. A clinical decision support system for predicting CS birth was developed using five machine learning techniques including logistic regression, Support Vector Machines, Naïve Bayes, Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting. Measures such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) were used for the model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 2310 deliveries, the prevalence of CS birth was 37.7% with previous CS being the most prevalent indication. The Random Forest model showed the best performance for predicting CS birth with an accuracy of 0.981, recall of 0.994, F1 score of 0.985 and an AUC-ROC of 0.988. The Naïve Bayes model followed with an accuracy of 0.965, recall of 0.967, F1 score of 0.972 and AUC-ROC of 0.986. The top five most important predictors proved to be diastolic (0.0906) and systolic (0.0848) blood pressures, maternal age (0.0756), previous CS (0.0641) and marital status (0.0400).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that although all five machine learning techniques had good performance in determining CS births, the Random Forest model was superior to all the others in predicting them. This finding suggests that machine learning could help identify at-risk pregnant women for CS births, potentially supporting early interventions and informing policies in maternal healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219967/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07716-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07716-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机器学习算法可能有助于改善孕产妇和儿童健康,包括确定低资源国家剖腹产(CS)分娩的适用性。尽管机器学习算法为预测/诊断与健康相关的问题提供了更强大的方法,但在撒哈拉以南非洲,关于机器学习算法在确定CS出生方面的应用的研究很少。因此,本研究旨在比较五种机器学习技术在预测加纳一家地区医院孕妇CS分娩方面的表现。方法:这是一项横断面研究,使用了来自加纳一家地区医院分娩的孕妇医疗记录的回顾性数据。使用五种机器学习技术,包括逻辑回归、支持向量机、Naïve贝叶斯、随机森林和极端梯度增强,开发了预测CS出生的临床决策支持系统。采用准确性、敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值以及受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)等指标来衡量模型的性能。结果:在2310例分娩中,CS出生的患病率为37.7%,既往CS是最常见的指征。随机森林模型预测CS出生的准确率为0.981,召回率为0.994,F1得分为0.985,AUC-ROC为0.988。Naïve贝叶斯模型的准确率为0.965,召回率为0.967,F1得分为0.972,AUC-ROC为0.986。最重要的5个预测因子分别是舒张压(0.0906)和收缩压(0.0848)、产妇年龄(0.0756)、既往CS(0.0641)和婚姻状况(0.0400)。结论:本研究表明,尽管所有五种机器学习技术在确定CS出生方面都有良好的表现,但随机森林模型在预测它们方面优于所有其他模型。这一发现表明,机器学习可以帮助识别CS分娩的高危孕妇,潜在地支持早期干预措施,并为孕产妇保健政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of caesarean section birth using machine learning algorithms among pregnant women in a district hospital in Ghana.

Background: Machine learning algorithms may contribute to improving maternal and child health, including determining the suitability of caesarean section (CS) births in low-resource countries. Despite machine learning algorithms offering a more robust approach to predicting/diagnosing a health-related problem, research on their use in determining CS birth is scarce in sub-Saharan Africa. This study therefore aimed to compare the performance of five machine learning techniques in predicting CS birth among pregnant women in a district hospital in Ghana.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that used retrospective data from medical records of pregnant women who delivered at a district hospital in Ghana. A clinical decision support system for predicting CS birth was developed using five machine learning techniques including logistic regression, Support Vector Machines, Naïve Bayes, Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting. Measures such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) were used for the model performance.

Results: Of a total of 2310 deliveries, the prevalence of CS birth was 37.7% with previous CS being the most prevalent indication. The Random Forest model showed the best performance for predicting CS birth with an accuracy of 0.981, recall of 0.994, F1 score of 0.985 and an AUC-ROC of 0.988. The Naïve Bayes model followed with an accuracy of 0.965, recall of 0.967, F1 score of 0.972 and AUC-ROC of 0.986. The top five most important predictors proved to be diastolic (0.0906) and systolic (0.0848) blood pressures, maternal age (0.0756), previous CS (0.0641) and marital status (0.0400).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that although all five machine learning techniques had good performance in determining CS births, the Random Forest model was superior to all the others in predicting them. This finding suggests that machine learning could help identify at-risk pregnant women for CS births, potentially supporting early interventions and informing policies in maternal healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信