院外心脏骤停后体外心肺复苏患者多巴酚丁胺的使用:SAVE-J II研究的二次分析

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Tasuku Hada, Toru Hifumi, Hiromu Okano, Kasumi Shirasaki, Shutaro Isokawa, Akihiko Inoue, Tetsuya Sakamoto, Yasuhiro Kuroda, Norio Otani
{"title":"院外心脏骤停后体外心肺复苏患者多巴酚丁胺的使用:SAVE-J II研究的二次分析","authors":"Tasuku Hada, Toru Hifumi, Hiromu Okano, Kasumi Shirasaki, Shutaro Isokawa, Akihiko Inoue, Tetsuya Sakamoto, Yasuhiro Kuroda, Norio Otani","doi":"10.1111/aor.15055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of dobutamine on outcomes in patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between dobutamine use within 24 h and clinical outcomes in patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post hoc analysis was conducted on the registry data from the SAVE-J II study (2013-2018). To address potential confounding variables related to dobutamine administration, 1:3 propensity score matching was employed using the patients' baseline characteristics. Following the matching, the dobutamine and non-dobutamine groups were compared, focusing on in-hospital mortality and neurological outcomes assessed using the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2157 registered cases, 581 cases of cardiogenic OHCA treated with targeted temperature management were included in this analysis. Eighty-eight patients who received dobutamine were compared with 264 who did not after propensity score matching. The in-hospital mortality rate was 60.2% in the dobutamine group, compared with 58.3% in the non-dobutamine group (p = 0.80). The proportion of patients with a CPC score of 3-5 at hospital discharge was 79.5% in the dobutamine group, compared with 78.0% in the non-dobutamine group (p = 0.88). A Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no significant differences in survival rates between the two groups (42.1 vs. 43.6%, log-rank p = 0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR, dobutamine administration within 24 h was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality and neurological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dobutamine Use in Patients With Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Secondary Analysis of the SAVE-J II Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tasuku Hada, Toru Hifumi, Hiromu Okano, Kasumi Shirasaki, Shutaro Isokawa, Akihiko Inoue, Tetsuya Sakamoto, Yasuhiro Kuroda, Norio Otani\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aor.15055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of dobutamine on outcomes in patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between dobutamine use within 24 h and clinical outcomes in patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post hoc analysis was conducted on the registry data from the SAVE-J II study (2013-2018). To address potential confounding variables related to dobutamine administration, 1:3 propensity score matching was employed using the patients' baseline characteristics. Following the matching, the dobutamine and non-dobutamine groups were compared, focusing on in-hospital mortality and neurological outcomes assessed using the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2157 registered cases, 581 cases of cardiogenic OHCA treated with targeted temperature management were included in this analysis. Eighty-eight patients who received dobutamine were compared with 264 who did not after propensity score matching. The in-hospital mortality rate was 60.2% in the dobutamine group, compared with 58.3% in the non-dobutamine group (p = 0.80). The proportion of patients with a CPC score of 3-5 at hospital discharge was 79.5% in the dobutamine group, compared with 78.0% in the non-dobutamine group (p = 0.88). A Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no significant differences in survival rates between the two groups (42.1 vs. 43.6%, log-rank p = 0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR, dobutamine administration within 24 h was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality and neurological outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial organs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.15055\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.15055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多巴酚丁胺对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者经体外心肺复苏(ECPR)治疗后预后的影响尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估接受ECPR的OHCA患者24小时内多巴酚丁胺使用与临床结果之间的关系。方法:对SAVE-J II研究(2013-2018)的注册表数据进行事后分析。为了解决与多巴酚丁胺给药相关的潜在混杂变量,采用1:3倾向评分匹配患者的基线特征。匹配后,比较多巴酚丁胺组和非多巴酚丁胺组,重点关注住院死亡率和使用脑功能类别(CPC)量表评估的神经预后。结果:在2157例登记病例中,581例心源性OHCA经靶向温度管理纳入本分析。在倾向评分匹配后,88名接受多巴酚丁胺治疗的患者与264名未接受多巴酚丁胺治疗的患者进行比较。多巴酚丁胺组住院死亡率为60.2%,而非多巴酚丁胺组为58.3% (p = 0.80)。多巴酚丁胺组CPC评分为3-5分的患者出院比例为79.5%,而非多巴酚丁胺组为78.0% (p = 0.88)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示两组患者的生存率无显著差异(42.1 vs 43.6%, log-rank p = 0.79)。结论:在接受ECPR的OHCA患者中,24小时内给药多巴酚丁胺与住院死亡率和神经系统预后无显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dobutamine Use in Patients With Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Secondary Analysis of the SAVE-J II Study.

Background: The effects of dobutamine on outcomes in patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between dobutamine use within 24 h and clinical outcomes in patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR.

Methods: A post hoc analysis was conducted on the registry data from the SAVE-J II study (2013-2018). To address potential confounding variables related to dobutamine administration, 1:3 propensity score matching was employed using the patients' baseline characteristics. Following the matching, the dobutamine and non-dobutamine groups were compared, focusing on in-hospital mortality and neurological outcomes assessed using the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale.

Results: Of the 2157 registered cases, 581 cases of cardiogenic OHCA treated with targeted temperature management were included in this analysis. Eighty-eight patients who received dobutamine were compared with 264 who did not after propensity score matching. The in-hospital mortality rate was 60.2% in the dobutamine group, compared with 58.3% in the non-dobutamine group (p = 0.80). The proportion of patients with a CPC score of 3-5 at hospital discharge was 79.5% in the dobutamine group, compared with 78.0% in the non-dobutamine group (p = 0.88). A Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no significant differences in survival rates between the two groups (42.1 vs. 43.6%, log-rank p = 0.79).

Conclusion: In patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR, dobutamine administration within 24 h was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality and neurological outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信