老年人轻度外伤性脑损伤和外伤性颅内出血出院处置的现状和态度的全国调查。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Juliette A L Santing, Robert Croese, Joukje van der Naalt, Heleen den Hertog, Korné Jellema
{"title":"老年人轻度外伤性脑损伤和外伤性颅内出血出院处置的现状和态度的全国调查。","authors":"Juliette A L Santing, Robert Croese, Joukje van der Naalt, Heleen den Hertog, Korné Jellema","doi":"10.1007/s13760-025-02834-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are commonly seen by neurologists in clinical practice. Due to the lack of clear evidence on optimal management, most guidelines recommend hospital admission for these patients. However, some studies have shown that selected low-risk patients can be safely discharged from the Emergency Department (ED). In light of these differing opinions and a lack of Class 1 evidence, we aimed to explore current management practices and attitudes toward tICH in older mTBI patients in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national online survey, involving the disposition strategies for five case vignettes of tICH, was sent to neurology residents and neurologists to explore current variations in clinical practice. We evaluated patient and hemorrhage characteristics influencing decisions regarding the discharge disposition of a patient from the ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was completed by 113 respondents, including 36 (32%) residents and 77 (68%) neurologists. In all the cases, over 70% of respondents preferred hospital admission over ED discharge for older mTBI patients with tICH. There was substantial variation in the respondents' willingness to participate in a randomized trial evaluating the necessity of hospital admission after mTBI with tICH. Factors influencing admission varied between cases. A secondary deterioration risk of 1-2% was considered acceptable by the majority (53%) to allow direct ED discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate limited willingness among clinicians to discharge older mTBI patients with tICH directly from the ED. To support safe and consistent decision-making, high-quality evidence is urgently needed to guide disposition decisions for older mTBI patients with tICH.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National survey of current practices and attitudes regarding discharge disposition for older adults with mild traumatic brain injury and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.\",\"authors\":\"Juliette A L Santing, Robert Croese, Joukje van der Naalt, Heleen den Hertog, Korné Jellema\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13760-025-02834-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are commonly seen by neurologists in clinical practice. Due to the lack of clear evidence on optimal management, most guidelines recommend hospital admission for these patients. However, some studies have shown that selected low-risk patients can be safely discharged from the Emergency Department (ED). In light of these differing opinions and a lack of Class 1 evidence, we aimed to explore current management practices and attitudes toward tICH in older mTBI patients in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national online survey, involving the disposition strategies for five case vignettes of tICH, was sent to neurology residents and neurologists to explore current variations in clinical practice. We evaluated patient and hemorrhage characteristics influencing decisions regarding the discharge disposition of a patient from the ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was completed by 113 respondents, including 36 (32%) residents and 77 (68%) neurologists. In all the cases, over 70% of respondents preferred hospital admission over ED discharge for older mTBI patients with tICH. There was substantial variation in the respondents' willingness to participate in a randomized trial evaluating the necessity of hospital admission after mTBI with tICH. Factors influencing admission varied between cases. A secondary deterioration risk of 1-2% was considered acceptable by the majority (53%) to allow direct ED discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate limited willingness among clinicians to discharge older mTBI patients with tICH directly from the ED. To support safe and consistent decision-making, high-quality evidence is urgently needed to guide disposition decisions for older mTBI patients with tICH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta neurologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta neurologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-025-02834-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-025-02834-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年患者在轻度外伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后并发外伤性颅内出血(tICH)是神经科医生在临床实践中常见的病例。由于缺乏关于最佳管理的明确证据,大多数指南建议这些患者住院。然而,一些研究表明,选定的低风险患者可以安全地从急诊科(ED)出院。鉴于这些不同的观点和缺乏一级证据,我们旨在探讨荷兰老年mTBI患者中tICH的当前管理实践和态度。方法:一项全国性的在线调查,包括对5个tICH病例的处理策略,发送给神经内科住院医师和神经内科医生,以探讨当前临床实践中的变化。我们评估了患者和出血特征对ed患者出院决定的影响。结果:113名受访者完成了调查,其中包括36名(32%)住院医生和77名(68%)神经科医生。在所有病例中,超过70%的受访者更倾向于住院治疗而不是出院治疗老年mTBI合并tICH患者。在一项评估mTBI合并tICH后住院必要性的随机试验中,受访者参与意愿存在实质性差异。影响住院的因素因病例而异。大多数人(53%)认为1-2%的二次恶化风险可以接受直接ED出院。结论:我们的研究结果表明,临床医生对老年mTBI合并tICH患者直接从急诊科出院的意愿有限。为了支持安全一致的决策,迫切需要高质量的证据来指导老年mTBI合并tICH患者的处置决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National survey of current practices and attitudes regarding discharge disposition for older adults with mild traumatic brain injury and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Background: Older patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are commonly seen by neurologists in clinical practice. Due to the lack of clear evidence on optimal management, most guidelines recommend hospital admission for these patients. However, some studies have shown that selected low-risk patients can be safely discharged from the Emergency Department (ED). In light of these differing opinions and a lack of Class 1 evidence, we aimed to explore current management practices and attitudes toward tICH in older mTBI patients in the Netherlands.

Methods: A national online survey, involving the disposition strategies for five case vignettes of tICH, was sent to neurology residents and neurologists to explore current variations in clinical practice. We evaluated patient and hemorrhage characteristics influencing decisions regarding the discharge disposition of a patient from the ED.

Results: The survey was completed by 113 respondents, including 36 (32%) residents and 77 (68%) neurologists. In all the cases, over 70% of respondents preferred hospital admission over ED discharge for older mTBI patients with tICH. There was substantial variation in the respondents' willingness to participate in a randomized trial evaluating the necessity of hospital admission after mTBI with tICH. Factors influencing admission varied between cases. A secondary deterioration risk of 1-2% was considered acceptable by the majority (53%) to allow direct ED discharge.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate limited willingness among clinicians to discharge older mTBI patients with tICH directly from the ED. To support safe and consistent decision-making, high-quality evidence is urgently needed to guide disposition decisions for older mTBI patients with tICH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Belgica
Acta neurologica Belgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor. Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies: Belgian Neurological Society Belgian Society for Neuroscience Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis Belgian Stroke Council Belgian Headache Society Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信