Rodrigo Wenceslau, Jader S Cabral, Gabriel da Silva Souza, Felipe Lopes Rodrigues Silva, Giorgio S Senesi, Edenir Rodrigues Pereira-Filho, Cicero Cena, Matheus Cicero Ribeiro, Bruno S Marangoni
{"title":"基于激光诱导击穿光谱和机器学习算法的无毒弹药射击残留物分析。","authors":"Rodrigo Wenceslau, Jader S Cabral, Gabriel da Silva Souza, Felipe Lopes Rodrigues Silva, Giorgio S Senesi, Edenir Rodrigues Pereira-Filho, Cicero Cena, Matheus Cicero Ribeiro, Bruno S Marangoni","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gunshot residue (GSR) is defined as particles generated upon the discharge of ammunition from a firearm. The main components of ammunition include the primer, cartridge case, and bullet. GSR particles originated from a combination of these components as well as from internal firearm parts. For conventional ammunition, GSR can be reliably identified by detecting Pb, Ba, and Sb using scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). In contrast, GSR from nontoxic ammunition lacks these markers, making SEM-EDS detection ineffective. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was used to analyze GSR-NTA particles collected directly from shooters' hands to identify potential chemical fingerprints. Spectra were acquired across two spectral ranges (186-1042 nm and 186-570 nm), and elements such as H, N, O, C, Ti, Zn, Cu, Ba, Sr, Fe, Mg, and Al were detected. Multivariate analysis and machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied. The dataset was divided into training and external validation sets, with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) achieving 100 % classification accuracy. Spectral analysis revealed that Zn, Ti, Cu, and Fe were the primary elements responsible for sample differentiation, with minor contributions from Ba and Sr. In conclusion, the combination of LIBS and ML shows potential as a forensic tool for identifying GSR-NTA particles on the hands of individuals who have, or have not, discharged a firearm.</p>","PeriodicalId":435,"journal":{"name":"Talanta","volume":"296 ","pages":"128483"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of gunshot residue from nontoxic ammunition by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and machine learning algorithms.\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Wenceslau, Jader S Cabral, Gabriel da Silva Souza, Felipe Lopes Rodrigues Silva, Giorgio S Senesi, Edenir Rodrigues Pereira-Filho, Cicero Cena, Matheus Cicero Ribeiro, Bruno S Marangoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gunshot residue (GSR) is defined as particles generated upon the discharge of ammunition from a firearm. The main components of ammunition include the primer, cartridge case, and bullet. GSR particles originated from a combination of these components as well as from internal firearm parts. For conventional ammunition, GSR can be reliably identified by detecting Pb, Ba, and Sb using scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). In contrast, GSR from nontoxic ammunition lacks these markers, making SEM-EDS detection ineffective. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was used to analyze GSR-NTA particles collected directly from shooters' hands to identify potential chemical fingerprints. Spectra were acquired across two spectral ranges (186-1042 nm and 186-570 nm), and elements such as H, N, O, C, Ti, Zn, Cu, Ba, Sr, Fe, Mg, and Al were detected. Multivariate analysis and machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied. The dataset was divided into training and external validation sets, with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) achieving 100 % classification accuracy. Spectral analysis revealed that Zn, Ti, Cu, and Fe were the primary elements responsible for sample differentiation, with minor contributions from Ba and Sr. In conclusion, the combination of LIBS and ML shows potential as a forensic tool for identifying GSR-NTA particles on the hands of individuals who have, or have not, discharged a firearm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Talanta\",\"volume\":\"296 \",\"pages\":\"128483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Talanta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128483\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128483","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of gunshot residue from nontoxic ammunition by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and machine learning algorithms.
Gunshot residue (GSR) is defined as particles generated upon the discharge of ammunition from a firearm. The main components of ammunition include the primer, cartridge case, and bullet. GSR particles originated from a combination of these components as well as from internal firearm parts. For conventional ammunition, GSR can be reliably identified by detecting Pb, Ba, and Sb using scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). In contrast, GSR from nontoxic ammunition lacks these markers, making SEM-EDS detection ineffective. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was used to analyze GSR-NTA particles collected directly from shooters' hands to identify potential chemical fingerprints. Spectra were acquired across two spectral ranges (186-1042 nm and 186-570 nm), and elements such as H, N, O, C, Ti, Zn, Cu, Ba, Sr, Fe, Mg, and Al were detected. Multivariate analysis and machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied. The dataset was divided into training and external validation sets, with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) achieving 100 % classification accuracy. Spectral analysis revealed that Zn, Ti, Cu, and Fe were the primary elements responsible for sample differentiation, with minor contributions from Ba and Sr. In conclusion, the combination of LIBS and ML shows potential as a forensic tool for identifying GSR-NTA particles on the hands of individuals who have, or have not, discharged a firearm.
期刊介绍:
Talanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, short communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and on novel sensor and instrumentation developments, are encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, materials science and engineering, and analytical platforms for omics development are welcome.
Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. Simple spiking recoveries may not be sufficient. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.