理解团队过渡和行动过程的变化轨迹:一个监管焦点的视角

IF 6.8 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jia Li, Ci-Rong Li
{"title":"理解团队过渡和行动过程的变化轨迹:一个监管焦点的视角","authors":"Jia Li,&nbsp;Ci-Rong Li","doi":"10.1002/job.2878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Team transition processes (i.e., teams' evaluation and planning activities for goal accomplishment) and team action processes (i.e., teams' activities directly contributing to goal accomplishment) have been long conceptualized as dynamic; yet there has been little understanding of what drives team process dynamics and what results from it. Drawing on team development and team regulatory focus research, we examine the change trajectories of transition and action processes in temporally bounded teams and antecedents and consequences of such trajectories. We posit that deadlines for output delivery shift team members' attention and effort from conceptualizing project ideas and forming task structures to implementing project ideas and executing team tasks, thus rendering team transition processes to decrease and team action processes to increase over time. The extent to which transition processes decrease and action processes increase over time is determined by team regulatory focus, as team promotion focus sustains team effort for improvement and accomplishment over time and team prevention focus constrains it. Given that transition and action processes both contribute to team performance, teams that experience a less decrease in transition processes or a greater increase in action processes over time will achieve higher team performance in the end. We conducted a longitudinal study with 125 four-person student teams engaged in a business simulation over 7 weeks and measured team processes weekly. Overall, results from latent growth modeling (LGM) support our hypotheses.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"46 6","pages":"850-866"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Change Trajectories of Team Transition and Action Processes Over Time: A Regulatory Focus Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Jia Li,&nbsp;Ci-Rong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/job.2878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Team transition processes (i.e., teams' evaluation and planning activities for goal accomplishment) and team action processes (i.e., teams' activities directly contributing to goal accomplishment) have been long conceptualized as dynamic; yet there has been little understanding of what drives team process dynamics and what results from it. Drawing on team development and team regulatory focus research, we examine the change trajectories of transition and action processes in temporally bounded teams and antecedents and consequences of such trajectories. We posit that deadlines for output delivery shift team members' attention and effort from conceptualizing project ideas and forming task structures to implementing project ideas and executing team tasks, thus rendering team transition processes to decrease and team action processes to increase over time. The extent to which transition processes decrease and action processes increase over time is determined by team regulatory focus, as team promotion focus sustains team effort for improvement and accomplishment over time and team prevention focus constrains it. Given that transition and action processes both contribute to team performance, teams that experience a less decrease in transition processes or a greater increase in action processes over time will achieve higher team performance in the end. We conducted a longitudinal study with 125 four-person student teams engaged in a business simulation over 7 weeks and measured team processes weekly. Overall, results from latent growth modeling (LGM) support our hypotheses.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior\",\"volume\":\"46 6\",\"pages\":\"850-866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2878\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2878","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,团队过渡过程(即团队为实现目标而进行的评估和计划活动)和团队行动过程(即团队直接有助于实现目标的活动)一直被概念化为动态的;然而,对于是什么驱动了团队过程动态以及由此产生的结果,人们却知之甚少。在团队发展和团队监管焦点研究的基础上,我们研究了在时间有限的团队中,过渡和行动过程的变化轨迹,以及这些轨迹的前因和后果。我们假设输出交付的最后期限将团队成员的注意力和努力从概念化项目想法和形成任务结构转移到实现项目想法和执行团队任务,因此随着时间的推移,团队过渡过程减少,团队行动过程增加。随着时间的推移,过渡过程减少和行动过程增加的程度是由团队调节焦点决定的,因为团队促进焦点支持团队努力改进和完成,而团队预防焦点限制了它。假设过渡过程和行动过程都有助于团队绩效,那么随着时间的推移,在过渡过程中经历较少减少或在行动过程中经历较多增加的团队最终将获得更高的团队绩效。我们对125个四人学生团队进行了纵向研究,在7周的时间里进行了商业模拟,并每周测量团队流程。总体而言,潜在增长模型(LGM)的结果支持我们的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the Change Trajectories of Team Transition and Action Processes Over Time: A Regulatory Focus Perspective

Team transition processes (i.e., teams' evaluation and planning activities for goal accomplishment) and team action processes (i.e., teams' activities directly contributing to goal accomplishment) have been long conceptualized as dynamic; yet there has been little understanding of what drives team process dynamics and what results from it. Drawing on team development and team regulatory focus research, we examine the change trajectories of transition and action processes in temporally bounded teams and antecedents and consequences of such trajectories. We posit that deadlines for output delivery shift team members' attention and effort from conceptualizing project ideas and forming task structures to implementing project ideas and executing team tasks, thus rendering team transition processes to decrease and team action processes to increase over time. The extent to which transition processes decrease and action processes increase over time is determined by team regulatory focus, as team promotion focus sustains team effort for improvement and accomplishment over time and team prevention focus constrains it. Given that transition and action processes both contribute to team performance, teams that experience a less decrease in transition processes or a greater increase in action processes over time will achieve higher team performance in the end. We conducted a longitudinal study with 125 four-person student teams engaged in a business simulation over 7 weeks and measured team processes weekly. Overall, results from latent growth modeling (LGM) support our hypotheses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信