人类的缺陷和工程中的逻辑工具

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
André C. R. Martins
{"title":"人类的缺陷和工程中的逻辑工具","authors":"André C. R. Martins","doi":"10.1002/cjce.25764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper explores the limitations of human cognition, especially in engineering research, emphasizing the need for mathematical models and methods to guide decision-making and theory validation. While human cognition excels in certain tasks, it is prone to biases that can distort our understanding. Applications of complex systems to engineering are often approximations of reality rather than exact truths. The concept of emergence is examined to illustrate how macroscopic behaviours in systems may not be easily reducible to their microscopic components, highlighting the importance of both reductionist and holistic approaches. The trade-offs between simple and complex models in solving real-world problems are discussed in the context of the limitations of models in capturing the full complexity of the real systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9400,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"103 8","pages":"3512-3520"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjce.25764","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human flaws and logical tools in engineering\",\"authors\":\"André C. R. Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjce.25764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper explores the limitations of human cognition, especially in engineering research, emphasizing the need for mathematical models and methods to guide decision-making and theory validation. While human cognition excels in certain tasks, it is prone to biases that can distort our understanding. Applications of complex systems to engineering are often approximations of reality rather than exact truths. The concept of emergence is examined to illustrate how macroscopic behaviours in systems may not be easily reducible to their microscopic components, highlighting the importance of both reductionist and holistic approaches. The trade-offs between simple and complex models in solving real-world problems are discussed in the context of the limitations of models in capturing the full complexity of the real systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"103 8\",\"pages\":\"3512-3520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjce.25764\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25764\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25764","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了人类认知的局限性,特别是在工程研究中,强调需要数学模型和方法来指导决策和理论验证。虽然人类的认知能力在某些任务中表现出色,但它容易产生偏见,从而扭曲我们的理解。复杂系统在工程中的应用往往是对现实的近似,而不是精确的事实。研究涌现的概念是为了说明系统中的宏观行为如何不容易被简化为其微观组成部分,突出了还原论和整体方法的重要性。在模型在捕捉真实系统的全部复杂性方面的局限性的背景下,讨论了在解决现实世界问题时简单模型和复杂模型之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human flaws and logical tools in engineering

This paper explores the limitations of human cognition, especially in engineering research, emphasizing the need for mathematical models and methods to guide decision-making and theory validation. While human cognition excels in certain tasks, it is prone to biases that can distort our understanding. Applications of complex systems to engineering are often approximations of reality rather than exact truths. The concept of emergence is examined to illustrate how macroscopic behaviours in systems may not be easily reducible to their microscopic components, highlighting the importance of both reductionist and holistic approaches. The trade-offs between simple and complex models in solving real-world problems are discussed in the context of the limitations of models in capturing the full complexity of the real systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
448
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE) publishes original research articles, new theoretical interpretation or experimental findings and critical reviews in the science or industrial practice of chemical and biochemical processes. Preference is given to papers having a clearly indicated scope and applicability in any of the following areas: Fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, multiphase flows, separations processes, thermodynamics, process systems engineering, reactors and reaction kinetics, catalysis, interfacial phenomena, electrochemical phenomena, bioengineering, minerals processing and natural products and environmental and energy engineering. Papers that merely describe or present a conventional or routine analysis of existing processes will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信