通过一个非常大的、连贯的沿海海洋保护区网络来测量生物有效性

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Barbara Spiecker, Mark H. Carr, Daniel P. Malone, Avrey Parsons-Field, Kathryn Koehn, Daniel J. Pondella II, Jennifer E. Caselle
{"title":"通过一个非常大的、连贯的沿海海洋保护区网络来测量生物有效性","authors":"Barbara Spiecker,&nbsp;Mark H. Carr,&nbsp;Daniel P. Malone,&nbsp;Avrey Parsons-Field,&nbsp;Kathryn Koehn,&nbsp;Daniel J. Pondella II,&nbsp;Jennifer E. Caselle","doi":"10.1002/eap.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We evaluated the performance of California's coastal marine protected area (MPA) network, the largest scientifically designed network of its kind, using SCUBA survey data from a large-scale, long-term kelp forest monitoring program. To comprehensively evaluate MPA performance, we employed multiple metrics across various scales of taxonomic and spatial aggregation and four key results emerged. First, population responses to MPAs varied greatly across the large network, whether evaluated as combined taxa or individual focal species or at single MPA or regional scales. Second, while responses varied widely, effect size analysis revealed differences in magnitude of MPA performance over time, with targeted species increasing or declining less within MPAs compared to non-targeted species in all regions except the North Coast. Third, average response ratios further supported these findings by providing a cumulative perspective on MPA performance. Specifically, 80% of MPAs showed positive response ratios for targeted species, with 12 of these cases being significant, indicating generally higher biomass inside MPAs. Finally, using our most conservative performance framework of divergence between MPA and non-MPA (Ref) sites and between targeted and non-targeted species, only the South Coast and Northern Channel Islands regions exhibited a significantly positive trend in biomass ratios (MPA/Ref) over time for targeted species. While biomass ratios increased significantly over time within MPAs for targeted species, divergence between targeted and non-targeted species' trends was largely absent, except in the Northern Channel Islands where a marginally non-significant effect was noted. Taken together, these results demonstrate that MPA performance is variable across regions and taxa, and different aspects of performance were revealed depending on the metric used. This underscores the need for comprehensive evaluation approaches when assessing the effectiveness of large, networked MPAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"35 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.70074","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring biological effectiveness across a very large, coherent network of coastal marine protected areas\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Spiecker,&nbsp;Mark H. Carr,&nbsp;Daniel P. Malone,&nbsp;Avrey Parsons-Field,&nbsp;Kathryn Koehn,&nbsp;Daniel J. Pondella II,&nbsp;Jennifer E. Caselle\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eap.70074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We evaluated the performance of California's coastal marine protected area (MPA) network, the largest scientifically designed network of its kind, using SCUBA survey data from a large-scale, long-term kelp forest monitoring program. To comprehensively evaluate MPA performance, we employed multiple metrics across various scales of taxonomic and spatial aggregation and four key results emerged. First, population responses to MPAs varied greatly across the large network, whether evaluated as combined taxa or individual focal species or at single MPA or regional scales. Second, while responses varied widely, effect size analysis revealed differences in magnitude of MPA performance over time, with targeted species increasing or declining less within MPAs compared to non-targeted species in all regions except the North Coast. Third, average response ratios further supported these findings by providing a cumulative perspective on MPA performance. Specifically, 80% of MPAs showed positive response ratios for targeted species, with 12 of these cases being significant, indicating generally higher biomass inside MPAs. Finally, using our most conservative performance framework of divergence between MPA and non-MPA (Ref) sites and between targeted and non-targeted species, only the South Coast and Northern Channel Islands regions exhibited a significantly positive trend in biomass ratios (MPA/Ref) over time for targeted species. While biomass ratios increased significantly over time within MPAs for targeted species, divergence between targeted and non-targeted species' trends was largely absent, except in the Northern Channel Islands where a marginally non-significant effect was noted. Taken together, these results demonstrate that MPA performance is variable across regions and taxa, and different aspects of performance were revealed depending on the metric used. This underscores the need for comprehensive evaluation approaches when assessing the effectiveness of large, networked MPAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"volume\":\"35 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.70074\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70074\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用来自大规模长期海带森林监测项目的水肺调查数据,评估了加州沿海海洋保护区(MPA)网络的性能,这是同类网络中最大的科学设计网络。为了综合评价保护区的表现,我们采用了不同尺度的分类和空间聚集的多个指标,得出了四个关键结果。首先,种群对海洋保护区的响应在大网络中差异很大,无论是作为组合分类群还是单个焦点物种,还是在单个海洋保护区或区域尺度上进行评估。其次,尽管响应差异很大,但效应大小分析显示,随着时间的推移,海洋保护区内目标物种的增减幅度小于非目标物种,除北海岸外,所有地区都是如此。第三,平均响应比通过提供MPA绩效的累积视角进一步支持了这些发现。具体而言,80%的海洋保护区对目标物种的响应率为正,其中12个是显著的,表明海洋保护区内的生物量普遍较高。最后,使用我们最保守的MPA和非MPA (Ref)站点之间以及目标和非目标物种之间差异的性能框架,只有南海岸和北海峡群岛地区的目标物种的生物量比(MPA/Ref)随时间的变化呈现显著的正趋势。虽然目标物种的生物量比率随着时间的推移在海洋保护区内显著增加,但目标物种和非目标物种之间的差异趋势基本上不存在,除了在北海峡群岛注意到轻微的不显著影响。综上所述,这些结果表明,MPA的表现在不同的地区和分类群中是不同的,并且根据所使用的指标,表现出不同的方面。这强调了在评估大型联网海洋保护区的有效性时需要采用综合评价方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Measuring biological effectiveness across a very large, coherent network of coastal marine protected areas

Measuring biological effectiveness across a very large, coherent network of coastal marine protected areas

We evaluated the performance of California's coastal marine protected area (MPA) network, the largest scientifically designed network of its kind, using SCUBA survey data from a large-scale, long-term kelp forest monitoring program. To comprehensively evaluate MPA performance, we employed multiple metrics across various scales of taxonomic and spatial aggregation and four key results emerged. First, population responses to MPAs varied greatly across the large network, whether evaluated as combined taxa or individual focal species or at single MPA or regional scales. Second, while responses varied widely, effect size analysis revealed differences in magnitude of MPA performance over time, with targeted species increasing or declining less within MPAs compared to non-targeted species in all regions except the North Coast. Third, average response ratios further supported these findings by providing a cumulative perspective on MPA performance. Specifically, 80% of MPAs showed positive response ratios for targeted species, with 12 of these cases being significant, indicating generally higher biomass inside MPAs. Finally, using our most conservative performance framework of divergence between MPA and non-MPA (Ref) sites and between targeted and non-targeted species, only the South Coast and Northern Channel Islands regions exhibited a significantly positive trend in biomass ratios (MPA/Ref) over time for targeted species. While biomass ratios increased significantly over time within MPAs for targeted species, divergence between targeted and non-targeted species' trends was largely absent, except in the Northern Channel Islands where a marginally non-significant effect was noted. Taken together, these results demonstrate that MPA performance is variable across regions and taxa, and different aspects of performance were revealed depending on the metric used. This underscores the need for comprehensive evaluation approaches when assessing the effectiveness of large, networked MPAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信