LIBS快速土壤容重和碳储量估算:迈向可扩展的土壤碳监测

IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Paulino R. Villas-Boas, Débora M. B. P. Milori, Ladislau Martin-Neto
{"title":"LIBS快速土壤容重和碳储量估算:迈向可扩展的土壤碳监测","authors":"Paulino R. Villas-Boas,&nbsp;Débora M. B. P. Milori,&nbsp;Ladislau Martin-Neto","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Measuring soil bulk density (as well as carbon content) is crucial for accurate soil carbon stock calculations. Given the growing interest in soil carbon sequestration on farmlands as a strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, effective large-scale field monitoring has become more important than ever. However, traditional methods for measuring soil bulk density, such as the core (volumetric cylinder) and clod methods, require undisturbed samples, making them labour-intensive, time-consuming and costly—due to the high complexity of sample collection and preparation. To overcome these challenges, we developed a laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)-based method for efficient and cost-effective bulk density estimation that does not require undisturbed samples. We trained and evaluated LIBS-based models using a dataset of 880 diverse Brazilian soil samples, randomly split into 70% for training and 30% for testing. The LIBS-based models, combining discrete wavelet transform (DWT), feature selection via <i>F</i>-test for regression, and Ridge regression, achieved an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.72 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.12 g cm<sup>−3</sup> on the test set for soil bulk density prediction. Furthermore, by combining LIBS-predicted soil bulk density with measured soil carbon concentration, we estimated soil carbon stock, achieving an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.93 and an RMSE of 2.2 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> on the test set, indicating that the uncertainty in bulk density predictions has a minor impact on soil carbon stock estimations. To further streamline soil carbon stock estimation, we developed a model to directly predict soil carbon density—the product of soil carbon concentration and bulk density—using LIBS-derived spectral features, eliminating the need for separate measurements or estimations. Although this approach resulted in a lower <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.78 and a higher RMSE of 4.1 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>, its performance was adequate for carbon stock prediction while simplifying the estimation process. These findings highlight the potential of LIBS as a rapid and effective tool for assessing soil bulk and carbon densities, contributing to sustainable soil management and climate change mitigation and adaptation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LIBS for Rapid Soil Bulk Density and Carbon Stock Estimations: Toward Scalable Soil Carbon Monitoring\",\"authors\":\"Paulino R. Villas-Boas,&nbsp;Débora M. B. P. Milori,&nbsp;Ladislau Martin-Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejss.70151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Measuring soil bulk density (as well as carbon content) is crucial for accurate soil carbon stock calculations. Given the growing interest in soil carbon sequestration on farmlands as a strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, effective large-scale field monitoring has become more important than ever. However, traditional methods for measuring soil bulk density, such as the core (volumetric cylinder) and clod methods, require undisturbed samples, making them labour-intensive, time-consuming and costly—due to the high complexity of sample collection and preparation. To overcome these challenges, we developed a laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)-based method for efficient and cost-effective bulk density estimation that does not require undisturbed samples. We trained and evaluated LIBS-based models using a dataset of 880 diverse Brazilian soil samples, randomly split into 70% for training and 30% for testing. The LIBS-based models, combining discrete wavelet transform (DWT), feature selection via <i>F</i>-test for regression, and Ridge regression, achieved an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.72 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.12 g cm<sup>−3</sup> on the test set for soil bulk density prediction. Furthermore, by combining LIBS-predicted soil bulk density with measured soil carbon concentration, we estimated soil carbon stock, achieving an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.93 and an RMSE of 2.2 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> on the test set, indicating that the uncertainty in bulk density predictions has a minor impact on soil carbon stock estimations. To further streamline soil carbon stock estimation, we developed a model to directly predict soil carbon density—the product of soil carbon concentration and bulk density—using LIBS-derived spectral features, eliminating the need for separate measurements or estimations. Although this approach resulted in a lower <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.78 and a higher RMSE of 4.1 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>, its performance was adequate for carbon stock prediction while simplifying the estimation process. These findings highlight the potential of LIBS as a rapid and effective tool for assessing soil bulk and carbon densities, contributing to sustainable soil management and climate change mitigation and adaptation.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"76 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70151\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

测量土壤容重(以及碳含量)对于准确计算土壤碳储量至关重要。鉴于人们对农田土壤碳封存作为一种减少温室气体排放的策略越来越感兴趣,有效的大规模现场监测变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。然而,测量土壤容重的传统方法,如岩心(体积圆柱体)和粘土方法,需要未受干扰的样品,由于样品收集和制备的高度复杂性,使它们成为劳动密集型、耗时和昂贵的。为了克服这些挑战,我们开发了一种基于激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)的方法,该方法高效且具有成本效益,不需要未受干扰的样品。我们使用880个不同巴西土壤样本的数据集来训练和评估基于libs的模型,随机分为70%用于训练,30%用于测试。基于libs的模型,结合离散小波变换(DWT)、回归f检验特征选择和Ridge回归,在土壤容重预测测试集上实现了R2为0.72,均方根误差(RMSE)为0.12 g cm−3。此外,通过将lbs预测的土壤容重与测量的土壤碳浓度相结合,我们估算了土壤碳储量,在测试集上获得了R2为0.93,RMSE为2.2 Mg C ha - 1,表明容重预测的不确定性对土壤碳储量估算的影响较小。为了进一步简化土壤碳储量的估算,我们开发了一个模型,利用libs衍生的光谱特征直接预测土壤碳密度(土壤碳浓度和体积密度的乘积),从而消除了单独测量或估算的需要。尽管该方法的R2较低,为0.78,RMSE较高,为4.1 Mg C ha−1,但其性能足以用于碳储量预测,同时简化了估算过程。这些发现突出了LIBS作为评估土壤体积和碳密度的快速有效工具的潜力,有助于可持续土壤管理以及减缓和适应气候变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LIBS for Rapid Soil Bulk Density and Carbon Stock Estimations: Toward Scalable Soil Carbon Monitoring

Measuring soil bulk density (as well as carbon content) is crucial for accurate soil carbon stock calculations. Given the growing interest in soil carbon sequestration on farmlands as a strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, effective large-scale field monitoring has become more important than ever. However, traditional methods for measuring soil bulk density, such as the core (volumetric cylinder) and clod methods, require undisturbed samples, making them labour-intensive, time-consuming and costly—due to the high complexity of sample collection and preparation. To overcome these challenges, we developed a laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)-based method for efficient and cost-effective bulk density estimation that does not require undisturbed samples. We trained and evaluated LIBS-based models using a dataset of 880 diverse Brazilian soil samples, randomly split into 70% for training and 30% for testing. The LIBS-based models, combining discrete wavelet transform (DWT), feature selection via F-test for regression, and Ridge regression, achieved an R2 of 0.72 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.12 g cm−3 on the test set for soil bulk density prediction. Furthermore, by combining LIBS-predicted soil bulk density with measured soil carbon concentration, we estimated soil carbon stock, achieving an R2 of 0.93 and an RMSE of 2.2 Mg C ha−1 on the test set, indicating that the uncertainty in bulk density predictions has a minor impact on soil carbon stock estimations. To further streamline soil carbon stock estimation, we developed a model to directly predict soil carbon density—the product of soil carbon concentration and bulk density—using LIBS-derived spectral features, eliminating the need for separate measurements or estimations. Although this approach resulted in a lower R2 of 0.78 and a higher RMSE of 4.1 Mg C ha−1, its performance was adequate for carbon stock prediction while simplifying the estimation process. These findings highlight the potential of LIBS as a rapid and effective tool for assessing soil bulk and carbon densities, contributing to sustainable soil management and climate change mitigation and adaptation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信