阴离子交换膜吸附剂在超滤和滤缓冲液制备过程中去除内毒素的比较分析

IF 3.9 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Sven Heimann, Andrew Vail, Sophie Muczenski, Alexander Faude
{"title":"阴离子交换膜吸附剂在超滤和滤缓冲液制备过程中去除内毒素的比较分析","authors":"Sven Heimann,&nbsp;Andrew Vail,&nbsp;Sophie Muczenski,&nbsp;Alexander Faude","doi":"10.1002/elsc.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the manufacturing of drug substances (DS), endotoxins are a commonly monitored contaminant and checked to ensure the safety and quality of the final product. In this study, we investigated endotoxin removal by commercial anion exchange membrane adsorbers during buffer preparation for an ultrafiltration and diafiltration (UFDF) unit operation as a risk mitigation strategy to meet DS endotoxin specifications. A bracketing design study was used to compare two quaternary amine (Q) modified membranes and one guanidinium functionalized hybrid adsorber for endotoxin removal from spiked buffers representing UFDF start and diafiltration buffer matrices. For the UFDF start buffer, Q-based membrane adsorbers were effective at the removal of endotoxin to the limit of detection in low ionic strength conditions, with one adsorber effective up to 24 mS/cm. Switching to a more complex UFDF diafiltration buffer, Q-based membrane adsorbers were impacted by additional buffer components. The guanidinium-based hybrid membrane adsorber demonstrated endotoxin reduction to the limit of detection from both buffer matrices, showing removal across a wide pH range (4.7–8.3) and conductivity as high as 43 mS/cm. These results demonstrate an operational window for buffers and selected membrane adsorbers to mitigate risk by limiting endotoxin contamination prior to UFDF operations in pharmaceutical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11678,"journal":{"name":"Engineering in Life Sciences","volume":"25 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/elsc.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Anion Exchange Membrane Adsorbers for Endotoxin Removal During Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Buffer Preparation\",\"authors\":\"Sven Heimann,&nbsp;Andrew Vail,&nbsp;Sophie Muczenski,&nbsp;Alexander Faude\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/elsc.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>During the manufacturing of drug substances (DS), endotoxins are a commonly monitored contaminant and checked to ensure the safety and quality of the final product. In this study, we investigated endotoxin removal by commercial anion exchange membrane adsorbers during buffer preparation for an ultrafiltration and diafiltration (UFDF) unit operation as a risk mitigation strategy to meet DS endotoxin specifications. A bracketing design study was used to compare two quaternary amine (Q) modified membranes and one guanidinium functionalized hybrid adsorber for endotoxin removal from spiked buffers representing UFDF start and diafiltration buffer matrices. For the UFDF start buffer, Q-based membrane adsorbers were effective at the removal of endotoxin to the limit of detection in low ionic strength conditions, with one adsorber effective up to 24 mS/cm. Switching to a more complex UFDF diafiltration buffer, Q-based membrane adsorbers were impacted by additional buffer components. The guanidinium-based hybrid membrane adsorber demonstrated endotoxin reduction to the limit of detection from both buffer matrices, showing removal across a wide pH range (4.7–8.3) and conductivity as high as 43 mS/cm. These results demonstrate an operational window for buffers and selected membrane adsorbers to mitigate risk by limiting endotoxin contamination prior to UFDF operations in pharmaceutical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering in Life Sciences\",\"volume\":\"25 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/elsc.70029\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering in Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/elsc.70029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering in Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/elsc.70029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在原料药(DS)的生产过程中,内毒素是一种通常监测和检查的污染物,以确保最终产品的安全和质量。在这项研究中,我们研究了商业阴离子交换膜吸附剂在超滤滤(UFDF)装置操作缓冲液制备过程中的内毒素去除,作为满足DS内毒素规范的风险缓解策略。采用包套设计研究比较了两种季胺修饰膜和一种胍功能化杂化吸附剂对udf起始缓冲液和滤过缓冲液中内毒素的去除效果。对于udf起始缓冲液,在低离子强度条件下,q基膜吸附剂对内毒素的去除效果达到检出限,单个吸附剂的去除效果可达24 mS/cm。切换到更复杂的UFDF过滤缓冲液,q基膜吸附剂受到额外缓冲成分的影响。胍基杂化膜吸附剂对两种缓冲基质的内毒素还原达到检测极限,在很宽的pH范围内(4.7-8.3)去除,电导率高达43 mS/cm。这些结果表明,缓冲液和选定的膜吸附剂的操作窗口通过限制内毒素污染来降低风险,在制药应用的UFDF操作之前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Analysis of Anion Exchange Membrane Adsorbers for Endotoxin Removal During Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Buffer Preparation

Comparative Analysis of Anion Exchange Membrane Adsorbers for Endotoxin Removal During Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Buffer Preparation

During the manufacturing of drug substances (DS), endotoxins are a commonly monitored contaminant and checked to ensure the safety and quality of the final product. In this study, we investigated endotoxin removal by commercial anion exchange membrane adsorbers during buffer preparation for an ultrafiltration and diafiltration (UFDF) unit operation as a risk mitigation strategy to meet DS endotoxin specifications. A bracketing design study was used to compare two quaternary amine (Q) modified membranes and one guanidinium functionalized hybrid adsorber for endotoxin removal from spiked buffers representing UFDF start and diafiltration buffer matrices. For the UFDF start buffer, Q-based membrane adsorbers were effective at the removal of endotoxin to the limit of detection in low ionic strength conditions, with one adsorber effective up to 24 mS/cm. Switching to a more complex UFDF diafiltration buffer, Q-based membrane adsorbers were impacted by additional buffer components. The guanidinium-based hybrid membrane adsorber demonstrated endotoxin reduction to the limit of detection from both buffer matrices, showing removal across a wide pH range (4.7–8.3) and conductivity as high as 43 mS/cm. These results demonstrate an operational window for buffers and selected membrane adsorbers to mitigate risk by limiting endotoxin contamination prior to UFDF operations in pharmaceutical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering in Life Sciences
Engineering in Life Sciences 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Engineering in Life Sciences (ELS) focuses on engineering principles and innovations in life sciences and biotechnology. Life sciences and biotechnology covered in ELS encompass the use of biomolecules (e.g. proteins/enzymes), cells (microbial, plant and mammalian origins) and biomaterials for biosynthesis, biotransformation, cell-based treatment and bio-based solutions in industrial and pharmaceutical biotechnologies as well as in biomedicine. ELS especially aims to promote interdisciplinary collaborations among biologists, biotechnologists and engineers for quantitative understanding and holistic engineering (design-built-test) of biological parts and processes in the different application areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信