E. Guillén Botaya, Á. Soler García, J.L. Aparicio Martínez, A. Tejeda Gómez, F. Segura Llopis, A. Silvestre Muñoz
{"title":"【翻译文章】成人股骨颈骨折内固定:空心螺钉与股骨颈系统(FNS)的回顾性比较","authors":"E. Guillén Botaya, Á. Soler García, J.L. Aparicio Martínez, A. Tejeda Gómez, F. Segura Llopis, A. Silvestre Muñoz","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2025.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The FNS System DePuy Synthes® (EEUU, 2018) represents a recent alternative treatment for the fixation of femoral neck fractures, providing biomechanical advantages with respect to cannulated screws (3 CS). The objective of this study is to compare the clinical results of both fixation methods.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A retrospective collection of the 36 subcapital fractures treated with the FNS system was carried out compared with a retrospective search of the last 35 patients treated with 3 CS. Age, sex, fracture pattern, delay until the intervention, length of intervention, hospital length stay, and haemoglobin loss were analysed. In addition, the rate of avascular necrosis, nonunion, symptomatic femoral neck shortening, and material protrusion with or without its removal were recorded during a minimum follow-up of 6 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were found in age (<em>p</em>-value 0.32), fracture patterns (<em>p</em>-value 0.77), surgical delay (<em>p</em>-value 0.28), surgical time (<em>p</em>-value 0.226), length of hospital stay (<em>p</em>-value 0.921) and blood loss (<em>p</em>-value 0.086) between the two groups.</div><div>A significantly higher overall complication rate was observed in the group treated with cannulated screws (<em>p</em>-value 0.004). Analysed separately, a higher rate of avascular necrosis, symptomatic shortening of the femoral neck, protrusion of the osteosynthesis material with or without removal was observed in the group treated with cannulated screws.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The FNS system represents a safe and reproductible alternative for the fixation of femoral neck fractures, showing non-inferior outcomes to treatment with cannulated screws.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":"69 4","pages":"Pages T385-T391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Translated article] Fixation of adult femoral neck fractures: Retrospective comparison between cannulated screws and femoral neck system (FNS)\",\"authors\":\"E. Guillén Botaya, Á. Soler García, J.L. Aparicio Martínez, A. Tejeda Gómez, F. Segura Llopis, A. Silvestre Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.recot.2025.04.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The FNS System DePuy Synthes® (EEUU, 2018) represents a recent alternative treatment for the fixation of femoral neck fractures, providing biomechanical advantages with respect to cannulated screws (3 CS). The objective of this study is to compare the clinical results of both fixation methods.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A retrospective collection of the 36 subcapital fractures treated with the FNS system was carried out compared with a retrospective search of the last 35 patients treated with 3 CS. Age, sex, fracture pattern, delay until the intervention, length of intervention, hospital length stay, and haemoglobin loss were analysed. In addition, the rate of avascular necrosis, nonunion, symptomatic femoral neck shortening, and material protrusion with or without its removal were recorded during a minimum follow-up of 6 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were found in age (<em>p</em>-value 0.32), fracture patterns (<em>p</em>-value 0.77), surgical delay (<em>p</em>-value 0.28), surgical time (<em>p</em>-value 0.226), length of hospital stay (<em>p</em>-value 0.921) and blood loss (<em>p</em>-value 0.086) between the two groups.</div><div>A significantly higher overall complication rate was observed in the group treated with cannulated screws (<em>p</em>-value 0.004). Analysed separately, a higher rate of avascular necrosis, symptomatic shortening of the femoral neck, protrusion of the osteosynthesis material with or without removal was observed in the group treated with cannulated screws.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The FNS system represents a safe and reproductible alternative for the fixation of femoral neck fractures, showing non-inferior outcomes to treatment with cannulated screws.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia\",\"volume\":\"69 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages T385-T391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441525000748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441525000748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
FNS System DePuy Synthes®(EEUU, 2018)代表了股骨颈骨折固定的最新替代治疗方法,与空心螺钉相比具有生物力学优势(3cs)。本研究的目的是比较两种固定方法的临床结果。方法回顾性收集FNS系统治疗的36例胫骨下骨折患者,并与3cs治疗的35例患者进行对比分析。分析年龄、性别、骨折类型、干预前延迟时间、干预时间、住院时间和血红蛋白损失。此外,在至少6个月的随访期间,记录了无血管坏死、不愈合、症状性股骨颈缩短和材料突出(切除或不切除)的发生率。结果两组患者年龄(p值0.32)、骨折类型(p值0.77)、手术延迟(p值0.28)、手术时间(p值0.226)、住院时间(p值0.921)、出血量(p值0.086)差异无统计学意义。采用空心螺钉组的总并发症发生率明显高于对照组(p值为0.004)。单独分析,观察到空心螺钉组有较高的无血管坏死率,股骨颈症状性缩短,或不取下植骨材料突出。结论FNS系统为股骨颈骨折的固定提供了一种安全且可重复性的替代方法,其疗效优于空心螺钉治疗。
[Translated article] Fixation of adult femoral neck fractures: Retrospective comparison between cannulated screws and femoral neck system (FNS)
Objective
The FNS System DePuy Synthes® (EEUU, 2018) represents a recent alternative treatment for the fixation of femoral neck fractures, providing biomechanical advantages with respect to cannulated screws (3 CS). The objective of this study is to compare the clinical results of both fixation methods.
Method
A retrospective collection of the 36 subcapital fractures treated with the FNS system was carried out compared with a retrospective search of the last 35 patients treated with 3 CS. Age, sex, fracture pattern, delay until the intervention, length of intervention, hospital length stay, and haemoglobin loss were analysed. In addition, the rate of avascular necrosis, nonunion, symptomatic femoral neck shortening, and material protrusion with or without its removal were recorded during a minimum follow-up of 6 months.
Results
No significant differences were found in age (p-value 0.32), fracture patterns (p-value 0.77), surgical delay (p-value 0.28), surgical time (p-value 0.226), length of hospital stay (p-value 0.921) and blood loss (p-value 0.086) between the two groups.
A significantly higher overall complication rate was observed in the group treated with cannulated screws (p-value 0.004). Analysed separately, a higher rate of avascular necrosis, symptomatic shortening of the femoral neck, protrusion of the osteosynthesis material with or without removal was observed in the group treated with cannulated screws.
Conclusions
The FNS system represents a safe and reproductible alternative for the fixation of femoral neck fractures, showing non-inferior outcomes to treatment with cannulated screws.
期刊介绍:
Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.