最大方向震动交替强度测量及相关地震动模型的建立

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Falak Vats, Dhiman Basu
{"title":"最大方向震动交替强度测量及相关地震动模型的建立","authors":"Falak Vats,&nbsp;Dhiman Basu","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seismic standards recommend RotD100 as the intensity measure to define the maximum direction shaking while accounting for directionality. Nevertheless, the inherent overestimation with this choice is well known. Alternatively, this paper proposes Rotated RotD100 spectrum, a single-component spectrum rotated to align with the orientation of the RotD100 spectral ordinate at the period of interest. This definition preserves the RotD100 spectral ordinate at any specific period while avoiding overestimation at other periods. Further, it is also consistent with the recent recommendation on alternate perspective critical orientation, aiming to maximise the structural response. Therefore, the proposed intensity measure for maximum direction shaking should be preferred in scenario-based seismic performance assessment. A novel framework is proposed for developing the ground motion model (GMM) with Rotated RotD100 as the intensity measure by modifying RotD100 GMM. The proposed framework is demonstrated with a subset of the NGA-West2 database. The modification factor is first numerically constructed, followed by its idealization for smoothness and practical convenience. This idealized representation also accounts for the contingency on seismological parameters: the rate of decay in modification function increases with magnitude or distance. Further, the proposed Rotated RotD100 GMM is compared with a pair of conventional GMMs (geometric-mean, RotD50 and RotD100), highlighting its unique ability to maximise response at the period of interest while still representing a realistic ground motion. Overall, the proposed framework and the Rotated RotD100 GMM are expected to be a valuable tool in several earthquake engineering applications, such as site-specific seismic hazard analysis and scenario-based performance assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 109648"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternate intensity measure for maximum direction shaking and construction of the associated ground motion models\",\"authors\":\"Falak Vats,&nbsp;Dhiman Basu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Seismic standards recommend RotD100 as the intensity measure to define the maximum direction shaking while accounting for directionality. Nevertheless, the inherent overestimation with this choice is well known. Alternatively, this paper proposes Rotated RotD100 spectrum, a single-component spectrum rotated to align with the orientation of the RotD100 spectral ordinate at the period of interest. This definition preserves the RotD100 spectral ordinate at any specific period while avoiding overestimation at other periods. Further, it is also consistent with the recent recommendation on alternate perspective critical orientation, aiming to maximise the structural response. Therefore, the proposed intensity measure for maximum direction shaking should be preferred in scenario-based seismic performance assessment. A novel framework is proposed for developing the ground motion model (GMM) with Rotated RotD100 as the intensity measure by modifying RotD100 GMM. The proposed framework is demonstrated with a subset of the NGA-West2 database. The modification factor is first numerically constructed, followed by its idealization for smoothness and practical convenience. This idealized representation also accounts for the contingency on seismological parameters: the rate of decay in modification function increases with magnitude or distance. Further, the proposed Rotated RotD100 GMM is compared with a pair of conventional GMMs (geometric-mean, RotD50 and RotD100), highlighting its unique ability to maximise response at the period of interest while still representing a realistic ground motion. Overall, the proposed framework and the Rotated RotD100 GMM are expected to be a valuable tool in several earthquake engineering applications, such as site-specific seismic hazard analysis and scenario-based performance assessment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125004415\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125004415","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地震标准推荐使用RotD100作为强度度量来定义最大方向震动,同时考虑到方向性。然而,这种选择固有的高估是众所周知的。或者,本文提出旋转RotD100谱,这是一种单组分谱,旋转以在感兴趣的周期与RotD100谱坐标的方向对齐。该定义保留了任何特定时期的RotD100谱坐标,同时避免了在其他时期的高估。此外,它也符合最近关于替代视角关键方向的建议,旨在最大限度地提高结构反应。因此,在基于场景的抗震性能评价中,应优先采用所提出的最大方向震动烈度度量。通过对RotD100旋转地震动模型进行改进,提出了一种以旋转RotD100为强度度量的地震动模型(GMM)的新框架。用NGA-West2数据库的一个子集演示了所提出的框架。首先对修正因子进行了数值构造,然后对其进行了理想化,以达到平滑和实用方便的目的。这种理想化的表示也说明了地震参数的偶然性:修正函数的衰减率随震级或距离的增加而增加。此外,将所建议的旋转RotD100 GMM与对传统的GMM(几何平均,RotD50和RotD100)进行比较,突出其在感兴趣的时期最大限度地响应的独特能力,同时仍然代表真实的地面运动。总的来说,拟议的框架和旋转的RotD100 GMM预计将在几个地震工程应用中成为一个有价值的工具,例如特定地点的地震危害分析和基于场景的性能评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternate intensity measure for maximum direction shaking and construction of the associated ground motion models
Seismic standards recommend RotD100 as the intensity measure to define the maximum direction shaking while accounting for directionality. Nevertheless, the inherent overestimation with this choice is well known. Alternatively, this paper proposes Rotated RotD100 spectrum, a single-component spectrum rotated to align with the orientation of the RotD100 spectral ordinate at the period of interest. This definition preserves the RotD100 spectral ordinate at any specific period while avoiding overestimation at other periods. Further, it is also consistent with the recent recommendation on alternate perspective critical orientation, aiming to maximise the structural response. Therefore, the proposed intensity measure for maximum direction shaking should be preferred in scenario-based seismic performance assessment. A novel framework is proposed for developing the ground motion model (GMM) with Rotated RotD100 as the intensity measure by modifying RotD100 GMM. The proposed framework is demonstrated with a subset of the NGA-West2 database. The modification factor is first numerically constructed, followed by its idealization for smoothness and practical convenience. This idealized representation also accounts for the contingency on seismological parameters: the rate of decay in modification function increases with magnitude or distance. Further, the proposed Rotated RotD100 GMM is compared with a pair of conventional GMMs (geometric-mean, RotD50 and RotD100), highlighting its unique ability to maximise response at the period of interest while still representing a realistic ground motion. Overall, the proposed framework and the Rotated RotD100 GMM are expected to be a valuable tool in several earthquake engineering applications, such as site-specific seismic hazard analysis and scenario-based performance assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信