M.O. Levin , D. Condon , N.Z. Krasner , E. Forester , C.C. Holmes , B.L. Bateman , A. Delach , J.R. Ennen , E.L. Kalies , R. Kays , J.E. Lovich , A.B. Smith , G.C. Wu , R.R. Hernandez
{"title":"太阳能选址生物多样性相关标准的书目综合","authors":"M.O. Levin , D. Condon , N.Z. Krasner , E. Forester , C.C. Holmes , B.L. Bateman , A. Delach , J.R. Ennen , E.L. Kalies , R. Kays , J.E. Lovich , A.B. Smith , G.C. Wu , R.R. Hernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widespread expansion of solar energy generation promises to help mitigate global-scale threats from climate change while potentially impacting biodiversity at local scales. Developers must attempt to maximize solar energy production while minimizing conflicts with biodiversity conservation, particularly as calls for the conservation of 30 % of the world's land and sea area gain traction. Here, we bibliographically synthesized peer-reviewed solar suitability analyses that attempt to optimize locations most suitable for solar development and convened a panel of energy experts to contextualize the use of biodiversity-relevant criteria in siting solar installations. We found that biodiversity-relevant criteria seemed to be used in solar suitability analyses primarily to meet legal requirements, and, thus, may not adequately account for the potential effects of solar infrastructure on local and/or regional biodiversity. The expert panel identified two primary barriers to incorporating biodiversity-relevant criteria into solar suitability analyses: a lack of quality data at relevant scales, and weak regulatory requirements that govern how biodiversity concerns are incorporated into solar siting. Solar energy development and biodiversity conservation address the twin crises of climate change and biodiversity loss, and the inclusion of biodiversity-relevant criteria into solar suitability analyses can ensure their goals remain aligned.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 116026"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bibliographic synthesis of biodiversity-relevant criteria for solar energy siting\",\"authors\":\"M.O. Levin , D. Condon , N.Z. Krasner , E. Forester , C.C. Holmes , B.L. Bateman , A. Delach , J.R. Ennen , E.L. Kalies , R. Kays , J.E. Lovich , A.B. Smith , G.C. Wu , R.R. Hernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The widespread expansion of solar energy generation promises to help mitigate global-scale threats from climate change while potentially impacting biodiversity at local scales. Developers must attempt to maximize solar energy production while minimizing conflicts with biodiversity conservation, particularly as calls for the conservation of 30 % of the world's land and sea area gain traction. Here, we bibliographically synthesized peer-reviewed solar suitability analyses that attempt to optimize locations most suitable for solar development and convened a panel of energy experts to contextualize the use of biodiversity-relevant criteria in siting solar installations. We found that biodiversity-relevant criteria seemed to be used in solar suitability analyses primarily to meet legal requirements, and, thus, may not adequately account for the potential effects of solar infrastructure on local and/or regional biodiversity. The expert panel identified two primary barriers to incorporating biodiversity-relevant criteria into solar suitability analyses: a lack of quality data at relevant scales, and weak regulatory requirements that govern how biodiversity concerns are incorporated into solar siting. Solar energy development and biodiversity conservation address the twin crises of climate change and biodiversity loss, and the inclusion of biodiversity-relevant criteria into solar suitability analyses can ensure their goals remain aligned.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"223 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125006999\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125006999","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bibliographic synthesis of biodiversity-relevant criteria for solar energy siting
The widespread expansion of solar energy generation promises to help mitigate global-scale threats from climate change while potentially impacting biodiversity at local scales. Developers must attempt to maximize solar energy production while minimizing conflicts with biodiversity conservation, particularly as calls for the conservation of 30 % of the world's land and sea area gain traction. Here, we bibliographically synthesized peer-reviewed solar suitability analyses that attempt to optimize locations most suitable for solar development and convened a panel of energy experts to contextualize the use of biodiversity-relevant criteria in siting solar installations. We found that biodiversity-relevant criteria seemed to be used in solar suitability analyses primarily to meet legal requirements, and, thus, may not adequately account for the potential effects of solar infrastructure on local and/or regional biodiversity. The expert panel identified two primary barriers to incorporating biodiversity-relevant criteria into solar suitability analyses: a lack of quality data at relevant scales, and weak regulatory requirements that govern how biodiversity concerns are incorporated into solar siting. Solar energy development and biodiversity conservation address the twin crises of climate change and biodiversity loss, and the inclusion of biodiversity-relevant criteria into solar suitability analyses can ensure their goals remain aligned.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.