代理系统偏差部分解决了东非热带地区长期存在的古气候数据模式差异

IF 3.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Charlie Marshall , Carrie Morrill , Sylvia Dee , Yueyang Jiang , Sue Kim , James Russell
{"title":"代理系统偏差部分解决了东非热带地区长期存在的古气候数据模式差异","authors":"Charlie Marshall ,&nbsp;Carrie Morrill ,&nbsp;Sylvia Dee ,&nbsp;Yueyang Jiang ,&nbsp;Sue Kim ,&nbsp;James Russell","doi":"10.1016/j.quascirev.2025.109426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Paleoclimate data-model comparison is a vital tool for evaluating climate model performance and constraining predictions of climate change. Paleoclimate records provide an important out-of-sample target to test models in climates with different boundary conditions and improve model physics. General Circulation Models (GCMs) from the Paleoclimate Model Intercomparison Project (PMIP) underestimate temperature changes in tropical Africa during key periods in the past, calling into question model predictions of future climate change in this region. We compare a new suite of 8 temperature records from tropical African lakes derived from glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) to simulations of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, 21 kya) and mid-Holocene (MH, 6 kya) from PMIP3 and PMIP4, and find that there is significant proxy/model temperature disagreement during both periods; GCMs are over 2 °C cooler than proxies during the MH, and 2 °C warmer than proxies during the LGM. This could arise from issues with GCMs or the GDGT records. We use a proxy system model (PSM) to investigate multiple potential sources of proxy uncertainty, including non-stationarity in the relationship between air and lake temperature, seasonality, and calibration error. We find that proxy system error <em>can</em> account for significant portions of this discrepancy during the MH (up to 80%) assuming the maximum possible error for each potential source, but not during the LGM. Our findings highlight potential areas for improvement in interpretation of proxy records by explicitly modeling and quantifying uncertainty in reconstructed temperatures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20926,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Science Reviews","volume":"366 ","pages":"Article 109426"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proxy System Biases partially resolve long-standing paleoclimate data-model discrepancies in Tropical East Africa\",\"authors\":\"Charlie Marshall ,&nbsp;Carrie Morrill ,&nbsp;Sylvia Dee ,&nbsp;Yueyang Jiang ,&nbsp;Sue Kim ,&nbsp;James Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.quascirev.2025.109426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Paleoclimate data-model comparison is a vital tool for evaluating climate model performance and constraining predictions of climate change. Paleoclimate records provide an important out-of-sample target to test models in climates with different boundary conditions and improve model physics. General Circulation Models (GCMs) from the Paleoclimate Model Intercomparison Project (PMIP) underestimate temperature changes in tropical Africa during key periods in the past, calling into question model predictions of future climate change in this region. We compare a new suite of 8 temperature records from tropical African lakes derived from glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) to simulations of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, 21 kya) and mid-Holocene (MH, 6 kya) from PMIP3 and PMIP4, and find that there is significant proxy/model temperature disagreement during both periods; GCMs are over 2 °C cooler than proxies during the MH, and 2 °C warmer than proxies during the LGM. This could arise from issues with GCMs or the GDGT records. We use a proxy system model (PSM) to investigate multiple potential sources of proxy uncertainty, including non-stationarity in the relationship between air and lake temperature, seasonality, and calibration error. We find that proxy system error <em>can</em> account for significant portions of this discrepancy during the MH (up to 80%) assuming the maximum possible error for each potential source, but not during the LGM. Our findings highlight potential areas for improvement in interpretation of proxy records by explicitly modeling and quantifying uncertainty in reconstructed temperatures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaternary Science Reviews\",\"volume\":\"366 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaternary Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027737912500246X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027737912500246X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古气候数据模式比较是评估气候模式性能和约束气候变化预测的重要工具。古气候记录为在不同边界条件下测试模式和改善模式物理特性提供了重要的样本外目标。古气候模式比对项目(PMIP)的一般环流模式(GCMs)低估了过去关键时期热带非洲的温度变化,这使模式对该地区未来气候变化的预测受到质疑。我们将来自热带非洲湖泊的甘油二烷基甘油四醚(GDGTs)的一套新的8个温度记录与PMIP3和PMIP4对末次盛冰期(LGM, 21 kya)和中全新世(MH, 6 kya)的模拟进行了比较,发现两个时期的代理/模式温度存在显著差异;在MH期间,gcm比代理低2°C以上,在LGM期间,gcm比代理高2°C。这可能源于gcm或GDGT记录的问题。我们使用代理系统模型(PSM)来研究代理不确定性的多种潜在来源,包括空气和湖泊温度之间关系的非平稳性、季节性和校准误差。我们发现,假设每个潜在源的最大可能误差,代理系统误差可以在MH期间(高达80%)解释这种差异的重要部分,但在LGM期间则不是。我们的发现强调了通过明确地模拟和量化重建温度的不确定性来改进代理记录解释的潜在领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proxy System Biases partially resolve long-standing paleoclimate data-model discrepancies in Tropical East Africa
Paleoclimate data-model comparison is a vital tool for evaluating climate model performance and constraining predictions of climate change. Paleoclimate records provide an important out-of-sample target to test models in climates with different boundary conditions and improve model physics. General Circulation Models (GCMs) from the Paleoclimate Model Intercomparison Project (PMIP) underestimate temperature changes in tropical Africa during key periods in the past, calling into question model predictions of future climate change in this region. We compare a new suite of 8 temperature records from tropical African lakes derived from glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) to simulations of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, 21 kya) and mid-Holocene (MH, 6 kya) from PMIP3 and PMIP4, and find that there is significant proxy/model temperature disagreement during both periods; GCMs are over 2 °C cooler than proxies during the MH, and 2 °C warmer than proxies during the LGM. This could arise from issues with GCMs or the GDGT records. We use a proxy system model (PSM) to investigate multiple potential sources of proxy uncertainty, including non-stationarity in the relationship between air and lake temperature, seasonality, and calibration error. We find that proxy system error can account for significant portions of this discrepancy during the MH (up to 80%) assuming the maximum possible error for each potential source, but not during the LGM. Our findings highlight potential areas for improvement in interpretation of proxy records by explicitly modeling and quantifying uncertainty in reconstructed temperatures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quaternary Science Reviews
Quaternary Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Quaternary Science Reviews caters for all aspects of Quaternary science, and includes, for example, geology, geomorphology, geography, archaeology, soil science, palaeobotany, palaeontology, palaeoclimatology and the full range of applicable dating methods. The dividing line between what constitutes the review paper and one which contains new original data is not easy to establish, so QSR also publishes papers with new data especially if these perform a review function. All the Quaternary sciences are changing rapidly and subject to re-evaluation as the pace of discovery quickens; thus the diverse but comprehensive role of Quaternary Science Reviews keeps readers abreast of the wider issues relating to new developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信