硅胶乳房植入物重建后乳房植入物疾病。

Jonathan Spoor,Marc A M Mureau,Renaud L M Tissier,Juliëtte Hommes,Hinne Rakhorst,Mintsje De Boer,Hester S A Oldenburg,Esther M Heuts,Yvonne L J Vissers,Anneriet E Dassen,Daniel J Evers,Linetta B Koppert,Laura H Zaal,Sabine C Linn,Daphne De Jong,Rene R W J Van Der Hulst,Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters,Eveline M A Bleiker,Flora E Van Leeuwen
{"title":"硅胶乳房植入物重建后乳房植入物疾病。","authors":"Jonathan Spoor,Marc A M Mureau,Renaud L M Tissier,Juliëtte Hommes,Hinne Rakhorst,Mintsje De Boer,Hester S A Oldenburg,Esther M Heuts,Yvonne L J Vissers,Anneriet E Dassen,Daniel J Evers,Linetta B Koppert,Laura H Zaal,Sabine C Linn,Daphne De Jong,Rene R W J Van Der Hulst,Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters,Eveline M A Bleiker,Flora E Van Leeuwen","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\n'Breast implant illness' (BII) is a constellation of non-specific constitutional, rheumatologic, mental and cognitive symptoms, reported increasingly by women carrying silicone breast implants (SBIs). The impact of BII on the well-being of breast cancer patients with SBI-based breast reconstructions is a subject of debate.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn a multicenter cohort of breast cancer survivors (n = 9,590) treated between 2000 and 2015 in six major regional hospitals in the Netherlands, we performed a health survey (response rate 64.7%). The presence of eighteen BII-associated symptoms was compared between patients with and without SBIs in multivariable logistic regression models. In a latent class analysis (LCA), distinct symptom patterns were identified in the study population.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nMedian follow-up time was 13.7 (IQR, 6.8) years. Of all SBI-exposed patients (n = 1,821), 20.7% reported ≥4 BII-associated symptoms, vs 21.2% of non-exposed patients (Risk Ratio 0.98, 95% CI [0.88-1.09]). Joint pain, sicca, sleep impairment, morning stiffness and shoulder pain were reported most frequently. Patients with SBIs did not have a significantly increased risk of any of the individual BII-associated symptoms. The LCA identified five distinct symptom clusters. Patients with SBI-exposure had a lower risk of falling in the most severe symptom cluster (Odds Ratio 0.64, 95% CI [0.43-0.96]). The other symptom clusters were not significantly associated with SBI-exposure.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur results indicate that breast cancer survivors with SBI-based reconstructions do not experience more BII-associated symptoms than breast cancer survivors without SBIs, challenging the notion of BII as a distinct clinical entity based on a generic silicone-induced biomechanical pathophysiological mechanism.\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nThis study was preregistered at ClinicalTrials.gov on June 2nd 2022 (NCT05400954).","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast implant illness after reconstruction with silicone breast implants.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Spoor,Marc A M Mureau,Renaud L M Tissier,Juliëtte Hommes,Hinne Rakhorst,Mintsje De Boer,Hester S A Oldenburg,Esther M Heuts,Yvonne L J Vissers,Anneriet E Dassen,Daniel J Evers,Linetta B Koppert,Laura H Zaal,Sabine C Linn,Daphne De Jong,Rene R W J Van Der Hulst,Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters,Eveline M A Bleiker,Flora E Van Leeuwen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djaf136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\n'Breast implant illness' (BII) is a constellation of non-specific constitutional, rheumatologic, mental and cognitive symptoms, reported increasingly by women carrying silicone breast implants (SBIs). The impact of BII on the well-being of breast cancer patients with SBI-based breast reconstructions is a subject of debate.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nIn a multicenter cohort of breast cancer survivors (n = 9,590) treated between 2000 and 2015 in six major regional hospitals in the Netherlands, we performed a health survey (response rate 64.7%). The presence of eighteen BII-associated symptoms was compared between patients with and without SBIs in multivariable logistic regression models. In a latent class analysis (LCA), distinct symptom patterns were identified in the study population.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nMedian follow-up time was 13.7 (IQR, 6.8) years. Of all SBI-exposed patients (n = 1,821), 20.7% reported ≥4 BII-associated symptoms, vs 21.2% of non-exposed patients (Risk Ratio 0.98, 95% CI [0.88-1.09]). Joint pain, sicca, sleep impairment, morning stiffness and shoulder pain were reported most frequently. Patients with SBIs did not have a significantly increased risk of any of the individual BII-associated symptoms. The LCA identified five distinct symptom clusters. Patients with SBI-exposure had a lower risk of falling in the most severe symptom cluster (Odds Ratio 0.64, 95% CI [0.43-0.96]). The other symptom clusters were not significantly associated with SBI-exposure.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nOur results indicate that breast cancer survivors with SBI-based reconstructions do not experience more BII-associated symptoms than breast cancer survivors without SBIs, challenging the notion of BII as a distinct clinical entity based on a generic silicone-induced biomechanical pathophysiological mechanism.\\r\\n\\r\\nTRIAL REGISTRATION\\r\\nThis study was preregistered at ClinicalTrials.gov on June 2nd 2022 (NCT05400954).\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:“乳房植入物疾病”(BII)是一系列非特异性体质、风湿病、精神和认知症状,越来越多的女性使用硅胶乳房植入物(SBIs)报道。BII对以sbi为基础的乳房重建的乳腺癌患者的健康的影响是一个有争议的话题。方法对2000年至2015年间在荷兰6家主要地区医院接受治疗的乳腺癌幸存者(n = 9590)进行多中心队列健康调查(有效率为64.7%)。在多变量logistic回归模型中比较了有无sbi患者的18种与bi相关的症状。在潜在分类分析(LCA)中,在研究人群中发现了不同的症状模式。结果中位随访时间为13.7 (IQR, 6.8)年。在所有sbi暴露患者(n = 1,821)中,20.7%报告了≥4种sbi相关症状,而未暴露患者的这一比例为21.2%(风险比0.98,95% CI[0.88-1.09])。关节痛、眩晕、睡眠障碍、晨僵和肩痛是最常见的。sbi患者出现任何个体bi相关症状的风险均未显著增加。LCA确定了五个不同的症状群。sbi暴露患者在最严重症状群中跌倒的风险较低(优势比0.64,95% CI[0.43-0.96])。其他症状群与sbi暴露无显著相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,基于sbi重建的乳腺癌幸存者没有比没有sbi的乳腺癌幸存者经历更多的BII相关症状,这挑战了BII作为基于硅酮诱导的生物力学病理生理机制的独特临床实体的概念。该研究已于2022年6月2日在ClinicalTrials.gov上进行预注册(NCT05400954)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breast implant illness after reconstruction with silicone breast implants.
BACKGROUND 'Breast implant illness' (BII) is a constellation of non-specific constitutional, rheumatologic, mental and cognitive symptoms, reported increasingly by women carrying silicone breast implants (SBIs). The impact of BII on the well-being of breast cancer patients with SBI-based breast reconstructions is a subject of debate. METHODS In a multicenter cohort of breast cancer survivors (n = 9,590) treated between 2000 and 2015 in six major regional hospitals in the Netherlands, we performed a health survey (response rate 64.7%). The presence of eighteen BII-associated symptoms was compared between patients with and without SBIs in multivariable logistic regression models. In a latent class analysis (LCA), distinct symptom patterns were identified in the study population. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 13.7 (IQR, 6.8) years. Of all SBI-exposed patients (n = 1,821), 20.7% reported ≥4 BII-associated symptoms, vs 21.2% of non-exposed patients (Risk Ratio 0.98, 95% CI [0.88-1.09]). Joint pain, sicca, sleep impairment, morning stiffness and shoulder pain were reported most frequently. Patients with SBIs did not have a significantly increased risk of any of the individual BII-associated symptoms. The LCA identified five distinct symptom clusters. Patients with SBI-exposure had a lower risk of falling in the most severe symptom cluster (Odds Ratio 0.64, 95% CI [0.43-0.96]). The other symptom clusters were not significantly associated with SBI-exposure. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that breast cancer survivors with SBI-based reconstructions do not experience more BII-associated symptoms than breast cancer survivors without SBIs, challenging the notion of BII as a distinct clinical entity based on a generic silicone-induced biomechanical pathophysiological mechanism. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was preregistered at ClinicalTrials.gov on June 2nd 2022 (NCT05400954).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信