参与设计公共卫生数据分析平台

IF 58.7 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
L. Otieno, P. Henderson, S. Khanna, N. Spurrier, L. J. Palmer, G. Hendrie, R. Mahoney, P. Arbon, J. Ferguson, P. Sharpe, M. Mittinty, H. Haji Ali Afzali, J. Rathjen, L. Bierbaum, G. Sallows, S. Omodei-James, S. Dahia, C. Miller, B. Bonevski, C. Ryder
{"title":"参与设计公共卫生数据分析平台","authors":"L. Otieno, P. Henderson, S. Khanna, N. Spurrier, L. J. Palmer, G. Hendrie, R. Mahoney, P. Arbon, J. Ferguson, P. Sharpe, M. Mittinty, H. Haji Ali Afzali, J. Rathjen, L. Bierbaum, G. Sallows, S. Omodei-James, S. Dahia, C. Miller, B. Bonevski, C. Ryder","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03806-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pandemics such as COVID-19 reveal unique challenges to public health systems worldwide, particularly the need for real-time insights into the risk of infectious disease spread to guide public health prevention and containment efforts<sup>1</sup>. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia reported the second lowest prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections per 100,000 people and the third lowest number of confirmed or suspected COVID-19 deaths per million population, relative to the 37 other countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development<sup>2</sup>. Although many factors contributed to this success, evidence-based decision-making and nationwide collaboration through the use of predictive modeling were key. This allowed policymakers to evaluate population risk and compare potential public health outcomes associated with various disease-control strategies<sup>3</sup>.</p><p>Other specific factors also had a part in ensuring Australia’s overall success. For example, the ability to maintain public confidence through timely sharing of information with the public was crucial in South Australia. To maintain this level of trust and degree of social license, relationships with local media were strengthened, and a substantial effort was made to ensure clarity of messaging. In addition, health officials built strong relationships with community groups, particularly with priority populations (such as culturally and linguistically diverse populations) through face-to-face meetings, where appropriate, and regular webinars.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-designing a public health data analytics platform\",\"authors\":\"L. Otieno, P. Henderson, S. Khanna, N. Spurrier, L. J. Palmer, G. Hendrie, R. Mahoney, P. Arbon, J. Ferguson, P. Sharpe, M. Mittinty, H. Haji Ali Afzali, J. Rathjen, L. Bierbaum, G. Sallows, S. Omodei-James, S. Dahia, C. Miller, B. Bonevski, C. Ryder\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03806-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Pandemics such as COVID-19 reveal unique challenges to public health systems worldwide, particularly the need for real-time insights into the risk of infectious disease spread to guide public health prevention and containment efforts<sup>1</sup>. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia reported the second lowest prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections per 100,000 people and the third lowest number of confirmed or suspected COVID-19 deaths per million population, relative to the 37 other countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development<sup>2</sup>. Although many factors contributed to this success, evidence-based decision-making and nationwide collaboration through the use of predictive modeling were key. This allowed policymakers to evaluate population risk and compare potential public health outcomes associated with various disease-control strategies<sup>3</sup>.</p><p>Other specific factors also had a part in ensuring Australia’s overall success. For example, the ability to maintain public confidence through timely sharing of information with the public was crucial in South Australia. To maintain this level of trust and degree of social license, relationships with local media were strengthened, and a substantial effort was made to ensure clarity of messaging. In addition, health officials built strong relationships with community groups, particularly with priority populations (such as culturally and linguistically diverse populations) through face-to-face meetings, where appropriate, and regular webinars.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"148 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":58.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03806-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03806-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19等大流行给全球公共卫生系统带来了独特的挑战,特别是需要实时了解传染病传播的风险,以指导公共卫生预防和控制工作。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,与经济合作与发展组织的其他37个国家相比,澳大利亚报告的每10万人中SARS-CoV-2感染率第二低,每百万人中确诊或疑似COVID-19死亡人数第三低。虽然促成这一成功的因素很多,但基于证据的决策和通过使用预测模型进行全国合作是关键。这使决策者能够评估人口风险,并比较与各种疾病控制策略相关的潜在公共卫生结果3。其他具体因素也在确保澳大利亚的总体成功方面发挥了作用。例如,通过及时与公众分享信息来保持公众信心的能力在南澳大利亚至关重要。为了保持这种程度的信任和社会许可,加强了与当地媒体的关系,并做出了大量努力,以确保信息的清晰。此外,卫生官员还通过面对面会议(如在适当情况下)和定期网络研讨会,与社区团体,特别是与重点人群(如文化和语言多样化的人群)建立了牢固的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-designing a public health data analytics platform

Pandemics such as COVID-19 reveal unique challenges to public health systems worldwide, particularly the need for real-time insights into the risk of infectious disease spread to guide public health prevention and containment efforts1. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia reported the second lowest prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections per 100,000 people and the third lowest number of confirmed or suspected COVID-19 deaths per million population, relative to the 37 other countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development2. Although many factors contributed to this success, evidence-based decision-making and nationwide collaboration through the use of predictive modeling were key. This allowed policymakers to evaluate population risk and compare potential public health outcomes associated with various disease-control strategies3.

Other specific factors also had a part in ensuring Australia’s overall success. For example, the ability to maintain public confidence through timely sharing of information with the public was crucial in South Australia. To maintain this level of trust and degree of social license, relationships with local media were strengthened, and a substantial effort was made to ensure clarity of messaging. In addition, health officials built strong relationships with community groups, particularly with priority populations (such as culturally and linguistically diverse populations) through face-to-face meetings, where appropriate, and regular webinars.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信