用有机杀虫剂处理新分裂的蜜蜂群落——破坏瓦螨综合治理的机遇。

Dan Aurell, Selina Bruckner, Todd D Steury, Geoffrey R Williams
{"title":"用有机杀虫剂处理新分裂的蜜蜂群落——破坏瓦螨综合治理的机遇。","authors":"Dan Aurell, Selina Bruckner, Todd D Steury, Geoffrey R Williams","doi":"10.1093/jee/toaf126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parasitism from Varroa mites (Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman, Mesostigmata: Varroidae) is a major driver of honey bee colony losses (Apis mellifera L., Hymenoptera: Apidae). While synthetic miticides are valuable for Varroa management, high reliance on these compounds has selected for miticide-resistant Varroa populations. To enable more sustainable Varroa management and provide options when synthetic miticides such as amitraz fail, effective Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approaches are urgently needed. Here, we show that organic miticides (oxalic acid, \"OA\"; and hops beta acids) can achieve high efficacy against Varroa when strategically combined with a widely used cultural control (starting new colonies, \"splits,\" with queen cells). This common splitting practice acts as a cultural control by temporarily reducing the amount of brood (developing bees) in colonies. This forces Varroa mites out of the protected environment of brood cells and on to adult bees-where they can be more effectively targeted with miticides. Based on Varroa infestation rates of adult bees, we determined that the organic miticide treatments OA dribble (75.5% efficacy), 5× OA dribble (82.2%), and HopGuard (82.7%) were significantly more effective than no treatment and provided comparable efficacy to amitraz-based miticides. In contrast, OA vapor (44.3%) did not provide effective Varroa control. Based on observations of queen and colony success, colony strength measurements, and hive weights, none of the organic miticides showed signs of harming colonies. Therefore, this combination of cultural and chemical control provides an additional opportunity for beekeepers to implement IPM for more effective and sustainable Varroa management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic entomology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treating newly split Apis mellifera honey bee colonies with organic miticides-an opportunity for Integrated Pest Management of Varroa destructor mites (Mesostigmata: Varroidae).\",\"authors\":\"Dan Aurell, Selina Bruckner, Todd D Steury, Geoffrey R Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jee/toaf126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Parasitism from Varroa mites (Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman, Mesostigmata: Varroidae) is a major driver of honey bee colony losses (Apis mellifera L., Hymenoptera: Apidae). While synthetic miticides are valuable for Varroa management, high reliance on these compounds has selected for miticide-resistant Varroa populations. To enable more sustainable Varroa management and provide options when synthetic miticides such as amitraz fail, effective Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approaches are urgently needed. Here, we show that organic miticides (oxalic acid, \\\"OA\\\"; and hops beta acids) can achieve high efficacy against Varroa when strategically combined with a widely used cultural control (starting new colonies, \\\"splits,\\\" with queen cells). This common splitting practice acts as a cultural control by temporarily reducing the amount of brood (developing bees) in colonies. This forces Varroa mites out of the protected environment of brood cells and on to adult bees-where they can be more effectively targeted with miticides. Based on Varroa infestation rates of adult bees, we determined that the organic miticide treatments OA dribble (75.5% efficacy), 5× OA dribble (82.2%), and HopGuard (82.7%) were significantly more effective than no treatment and provided comparable efficacy to amitraz-based miticides. In contrast, OA vapor (44.3%) did not provide effective Varroa control. Based on observations of queen and colony success, colony strength measurements, and hive weights, none of the organic miticides showed signs of harming colonies. Therefore, this combination of cultural and chemical control provides an additional opportunity for beekeepers to implement IPM for more effective and sustainable Varroa management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of economic entomology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of economic entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaf126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaf126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蜂螨(Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman, mesostimata: Varroidae)的寄生是蜜蜂群体损失的主要原因。虽然合成杀虫剂对瓦螨的管理很有价值,但对这些化合物的高度依赖已经选择了抗杀虫的瓦螨种群。为了实现更可持续的瓦螨管理,并在咪唑嗪等合成杀虫剂失效时提供选择,迫切需要有效的害虫综合管理(IPM)方法。在这里,我们表明有机杀菌剂(草酸,“OA”;当与广泛使用的培养控制(用后细胞开始新的菌落,“分裂”)有策略地结合时,可以达到对瓦罗亚的高效率。这种常见的分裂做法通过暂时减少蜂群中育雏(发育中的蜜蜂)的数量来作为一种文化控制。这迫使瓦螨离开受保护的育巢细胞环境,来到成年蜜蜂身上,在那里它们可以更有效地被杀螨剂靶向。结果表明,有机杀虫剂OA滴灌(有效率75.5%)、5倍OA滴灌(有效率82.2%)、HopGuard滴灌(有效率82.7%)处理的杀虫效果明显优于未处理,且与咪唑嗪类杀虫剂的杀虫效果相当。相比之下,OA蒸气(44.3%)不能有效控制瓦螨。根据对蜂王和蜂群成功、蜂群强度测量和蜂箱重量的观察,没有一种有机杀虫剂显示出伤害蜂群的迹象。因此,这种文化和化学控制的结合为养蜂人实施IPM以实现更有效和可持续的瓦螨管理提供了额外的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treating newly split Apis mellifera honey bee colonies with organic miticides-an opportunity for Integrated Pest Management of Varroa destructor mites (Mesostigmata: Varroidae).

Parasitism from Varroa mites (Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman, Mesostigmata: Varroidae) is a major driver of honey bee colony losses (Apis mellifera L., Hymenoptera: Apidae). While synthetic miticides are valuable for Varroa management, high reliance on these compounds has selected for miticide-resistant Varroa populations. To enable more sustainable Varroa management and provide options when synthetic miticides such as amitraz fail, effective Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approaches are urgently needed. Here, we show that organic miticides (oxalic acid, "OA"; and hops beta acids) can achieve high efficacy against Varroa when strategically combined with a widely used cultural control (starting new colonies, "splits," with queen cells). This common splitting practice acts as a cultural control by temporarily reducing the amount of brood (developing bees) in colonies. This forces Varroa mites out of the protected environment of brood cells and on to adult bees-where they can be more effectively targeted with miticides. Based on Varroa infestation rates of adult bees, we determined that the organic miticide treatments OA dribble (75.5% efficacy), 5× OA dribble (82.2%), and HopGuard (82.7%) were significantly more effective than no treatment and provided comparable efficacy to amitraz-based miticides. In contrast, OA vapor (44.3%) did not provide effective Varroa control. Based on observations of queen and colony success, colony strength measurements, and hive weights, none of the organic miticides showed signs of harming colonies. Therefore, this combination of cultural and chemical control provides an additional opportunity for beekeepers to implement IPM for more effective and sustainable Varroa management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信