流行病学、临床和运筹学项目中虚拟和现场ATS方法的比较。

IF 1.9 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Özge Yılmaz, Zuhal Karakurt, Eylem Tuncay, Sinem Güngör, Sonia Buist
{"title":"流行病学、临床和运筹学项目中虚拟和现场ATS方法的比较。","authors":"Özge Yılmaz, Zuhal Karakurt, Eylem Tuncay, Sinem Güngör, Sonia Buist","doi":"10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0129OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Methods in Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Operations Research (MECOR) program of the American Thoracic Society aims to strengthen research capacity in low- and middle-income countries. <b>Objective:</b> To compare the impact of online versus in-person MECOR level 1 and level 2 courses in Türkiye on program and research project completion rates and to understand student preferences for alternative program delivery. <b>Methods:</b> We enrolled all students who participated in MECOR Türkiye level 1 courses from 2020 to 2023. Through an online questionnaire, we collected information on progress of the research project developed at MECOR levels 1 and 2 and the students' progression through the end of the program. Research project progression (from design to data analysis) and three-level MECOR course completion was compared between the delivery methods, and student preference of online versus in-person courses was evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Sixty-five students attended MECOR course level 1 from 2020 to 2023, among whom 61 responded to the questionnaire. For the level 1 course, there was no statistical difference in completion rates of research projects in online versus in-person courses (<i>P</i> = 0.22). The preference for online teaching was higher (40%) among those who attended the online offering than among those who attended the in-person course (9.8%; <i>P</i> = 0.005). Forty students attended a MECOR level 2 course; numerically more students (87.5%) who attended an in-person course were at a data collection/analysis stage of their research project compared with the online students (56.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.10). At level 2, 12 students (37.5%) who attended online and 4 (50%) who attended in person also completed level 3 (<i>P</i> = 0.56). There was no significant difference between the groups who took level 2 in person versus online in preference of course format (78.1% and 87.5% preferred in-person level 2, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.86). <b>Conclusion:</b> Completion rates of research projects planned during the course and the overall program completion were not significantly affected by the virtual or in-person nature of the level 1 or level 2 MECOR courses, and the students' preferences for virtual courses vary depending on their own experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":72330,"journal":{"name":"ATS scholar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Virtual and In-Person ATS Methods in Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Operations Research Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Özge Yılmaz, Zuhal Karakurt, Eylem Tuncay, Sinem Güngör, Sonia Buist\",\"doi\":\"10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0129OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Methods in Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Operations Research (MECOR) program of the American Thoracic Society aims to strengthen research capacity in low- and middle-income countries. <b>Objective:</b> To compare the impact of online versus in-person MECOR level 1 and level 2 courses in Türkiye on program and research project completion rates and to understand student preferences for alternative program delivery. <b>Methods:</b> We enrolled all students who participated in MECOR Türkiye level 1 courses from 2020 to 2023. Through an online questionnaire, we collected information on progress of the research project developed at MECOR levels 1 and 2 and the students' progression through the end of the program. Research project progression (from design to data analysis) and three-level MECOR course completion was compared between the delivery methods, and student preference of online versus in-person courses was evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Sixty-five students attended MECOR course level 1 from 2020 to 2023, among whom 61 responded to the questionnaire. For the level 1 course, there was no statistical difference in completion rates of research projects in online versus in-person courses (<i>P</i> = 0.22). The preference for online teaching was higher (40%) among those who attended the online offering than among those who attended the in-person course (9.8%; <i>P</i> = 0.005). Forty students attended a MECOR level 2 course; numerically more students (87.5%) who attended an in-person course were at a data collection/analysis stage of their research project compared with the online students (56.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.10). At level 2, 12 students (37.5%) who attended online and 4 (50%) who attended in person also completed level 3 (<i>P</i> = 0.56). There was no significant difference between the groups who took level 2 in person versus online in preference of course format (78.1% and 87.5% preferred in-person level 2, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.86). <b>Conclusion:</b> Completion rates of research projects planned during the course and the overall program completion were not significantly affected by the virtual or in-person nature of the level 1 or level 2 MECOR courses, and the students' preferences for virtual courses vary depending on their own experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATS scholar\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATS scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0129OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATS scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0129OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国胸科学会的流行病学、临床和运筹学方法(MECOR)项目旨在加强中低收入国家的研究能力。目的:比较在线与面对面的 rkiye MECOR 1级和2级课程对项目和研究项目完成率的影响,并了解学生对替代项目交付的偏好。方法:我们招募了2020年至2023年参加MECOR rkiye 1级课程的所有学生。通过在线问卷调查,我们收集了MECOR 1级和2级研究项目的进展情况,以及学生在项目结束时的进展情况。研究项目进展(从设计到数据分析)和三级MECOR课程完成情况在交付方式之间进行了比较,并评估了学生对在线课程和面对面课程的偏好。结果:2020年至2023年,有65名学生参加了MECOR一级课程,其中61名学生参与了问卷调查。对于一级课程,在线课程与面对面课程的研究项目完成率无统计学差异(P = 0.22)。参加在线课程的学生对在线教学的偏好(40%)高于参加现场课程的学生(9.8%;p = 0.005)。40名学生参加了MECOR二级课程;参加面对面课程的学生(87.5%)在研究项目的数据收集/分析阶段比参加在线课程的学生(56.3%;p = 0.10)。在第2级,在线学习的12名学生(37.5%)和亲自学习的4名学生(50%)也完成了第3级学习(P = 0.56)。参加第二级课程的两组在课程形式偏好上没有显著差异(分别为78.1%和87.5%);p = 0.86)。结论:课程期间计划的研究项目完成率和整体课程完成率不受一级或二级MECOR课程的虚拟或面对面性质的显著影响,学生对虚拟课程的偏好取决于他们自己的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Virtual and In-Person ATS Methods in Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Operations Research Programs.

Background: The Methods in Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Operations Research (MECOR) program of the American Thoracic Society aims to strengthen research capacity in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: To compare the impact of online versus in-person MECOR level 1 and level 2 courses in Türkiye on program and research project completion rates and to understand student preferences for alternative program delivery. Methods: We enrolled all students who participated in MECOR Türkiye level 1 courses from 2020 to 2023. Through an online questionnaire, we collected information on progress of the research project developed at MECOR levels 1 and 2 and the students' progression through the end of the program. Research project progression (from design to data analysis) and three-level MECOR course completion was compared between the delivery methods, and student preference of online versus in-person courses was evaluated. Results: Sixty-five students attended MECOR course level 1 from 2020 to 2023, among whom 61 responded to the questionnaire. For the level 1 course, there was no statistical difference in completion rates of research projects in online versus in-person courses (P = 0.22). The preference for online teaching was higher (40%) among those who attended the online offering than among those who attended the in-person course (9.8%; P = 0.005). Forty students attended a MECOR level 2 course; numerically more students (87.5%) who attended an in-person course were at a data collection/analysis stage of their research project compared with the online students (56.3%; P = 0.10). At level 2, 12 students (37.5%) who attended online and 4 (50%) who attended in person also completed level 3 (P = 0.56). There was no significant difference between the groups who took level 2 in person versus online in preference of course format (78.1% and 87.5% preferred in-person level 2, respectively; P = 0.86). Conclusion: Completion rates of research projects planned during the course and the overall program completion were not significantly affected by the virtual or in-person nature of the level 1 or level 2 MECOR courses, and the students' preferences for virtual courses vary depending on their own experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信