Özge Yılmaz, Zuhal Karakurt, Eylem Tuncay, Sinem Güngör, Sonia Buist
{"title":"流行病学、临床和运筹学项目中虚拟和现场ATS方法的比较。","authors":"Özge Yılmaz, Zuhal Karakurt, Eylem Tuncay, Sinem Güngör, Sonia Buist","doi":"10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0129OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Methods in Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Operations Research (MECOR) program of the American Thoracic Society aims to strengthen research capacity in low- and middle-income countries. <b>Objective:</b> To compare the impact of online versus in-person MECOR level 1 and level 2 courses in Türkiye on program and research project completion rates and to understand student preferences for alternative program delivery. <b>Methods:</b> We enrolled all students who participated in MECOR Türkiye level 1 courses from 2020 to 2023. Through an online questionnaire, we collected information on progress of the research project developed at MECOR levels 1 and 2 and the students' progression through the end of the program. Research project progression (from design to data analysis) and three-level MECOR course completion was compared between the delivery methods, and student preference of online versus in-person courses was evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Sixty-five students attended MECOR course level 1 from 2020 to 2023, among whom 61 responded to the questionnaire. For the level 1 course, there was no statistical difference in completion rates of research projects in online versus in-person courses (<i>P</i> = 0.22). The preference for online teaching was higher (40%) among those who attended the online offering than among those who attended the in-person course (9.8%; <i>P</i> = 0.005). Forty students attended a MECOR level 2 course; numerically more students (87.5%) who attended an in-person course were at a data collection/analysis stage of their research project compared with the online students (56.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.10). At level 2, 12 students (37.5%) who attended online and 4 (50%) who attended in person also completed level 3 (<i>P</i> = 0.56). There was no significant difference between the groups who took level 2 in person versus online in preference of course format (78.1% and 87.5% preferred in-person level 2, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.86). <b>Conclusion:</b> Completion rates of research projects planned during the course and the overall program completion were not significantly affected by the virtual or in-person nature of the level 1 or level 2 MECOR courses, and the students' preferences for virtual courses vary depending on their own experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":72330,"journal":{"name":"ATS scholar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Virtual and In-Person ATS Methods in Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Operations Research Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Özge Yılmaz, Zuhal Karakurt, Eylem Tuncay, Sinem Güngör, Sonia Buist\",\"doi\":\"10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0129OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Methods in Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Operations Research (MECOR) program of the American Thoracic Society aims to strengthen research capacity in low- and middle-income countries. <b>Objective:</b> To compare the impact of online versus in-person MECOR level 1 and level 2 courses in Türkiye on program and research project completion rates and to understand student preferences for alternative program delivery. <b>Methods:</b> We enrolled all students who participated in MECOR Türkiye level 1 courses from 2020 to 2023. Through an online questionnaire, we collected information on progress of the research project developed at MECOR levels 1 and 2 and the students' progression through the end of the program. Research project progression (from design to data analysis) and three-level MECOR course completion was compared between the delivery methods, and student preference of online versus in-person courses was evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Sixty-five students attended MECOR course level 1 from 2020 to 2023, among whom 61 responded to the questionnaire. For the level 1 course, there was no statistical difference in completion rates of research projects in online versus in-person courses (<i>P</i> = 0.22). The preference for online teaching was higher (40%) among those who attended the online offering than among those who attended the in-person course (9.8%; <i>P</i> = 0.005). Forty students attended a MECOR level 2 course; numerically more students (87.5%) who attended an in-person course were at a data collection/analysis stage of their research project compared with the online students (56.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.10). At level 2, 12 students (37.5%) who attended online and 4 (50%) who attended in person also completed level 3 (<i>P</i> = 0.56). There was no significant difference between the groups who took level 2 in person versus online in preference of course format (78.1% and 87.5% preferred in-person level 2, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.86). <b>Conclusion:</b> Completion rates of research projects planned during the course and the overall program completion were not significantly affected by the virtual or in-person nature of the level 1 or level 2 MECOR courses, and the students' preferences for virtual courses vary depending on their own experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATS scholar\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATS scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0129OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATS scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0129OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Virtual and In-Person ATS Methods in Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Operations Research Programs.
Background: The Methods in Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Operations Research (MECOR) program of the American Thoracic Society aims to strengthen research capacity in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: To compare the impact of online versus in-person MECOR level 1 and level 2 courses in Türkiye on program and research project completion rates and to understand student preferences for alternative program delivery. Methods: We enrolled all students who participated in MECOR Türkiye level 1 courses from 2020 to 2023. Through an online questionnaire, we collected information on progress of the research project developed at MECOR levels 1 and 2 and the students' progression through the end of the program. Research project progression (from design to data analysis) and three-level MECOR course completion was compared between the delivery methods, and student preference of online versus in-person courses was evaluated. Results: Sixty-five students attended MECOR course level 1 from 2020 to 2023, among whom 61 responded to the questionnaire. For the level 1 course, there was no statistical difference in completion rates of research projects in online versus in-person courses (P = 0.22). The preference for online teaching was higher (40%) among those who attended the online offering than among those who attended the in-person course (9.8%; P = 0.005). Forty students attended a MECOR level 2 course; numerically more students (87.5%) who attended an in-person course were at a data collection/analysis stage of their research project compared with the online students (56.3%; P = 0.10). At level 2, 12 students (37.5%) who attended online and 4 (50%) who attended in person also completed level 3 (P = 0.56). There was no significant difference between the groups who took level 2 in person versus online in preference of course format (78.1% and 87.5% preferred in-person level 2, respectively; P = 0.86). Conclusion: Completion rates of research projects planned during the course and the overall program completion were not significantly affected by the virtual or in-person nature of the level 1 or level 2 MECOR courses, and the students' preferences for virtual courses vary depending on their own experience.