随机对照试验:结膜下麻醉时间对玻璃体内注射疼痛感觉的影响。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jiyeon Kim, Louis S Han, Logan Robinson, Tafadzwa Young-Zvandasara
{"title":"随机对照试验:结膜下麻醉时间对玻璃体内注射疼痛感觉的影响。","authors":"Jiyeon Kim, Louis S Han, Logan Robinson, Tafadzwa Young-Zvandasara","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intravitreal injection (IVI) is one of the most performed vitreoretinal procedures in ophthalmology. Subconjunctival anaesthesia (SCA) with 2% lidocaine is a commonly used modality to reduce procedural pain and patient distress. Currently, there is no unifying recommended wait time between SCA and IVI. The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal wait time between the two, whilst maintaining clinical efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-blinded randomised clinical trial. Two hundred and forty patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups: wait time of 2, 3, 4 or 5 min. The primary outcome was pain level graded by the patient on a 10-point visual analogue scale. The secondary outcome was the willingness to receive further IVI with the current pain level. Data points were collected on patient demographics and characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean pain scores showed a decreasing trend with increasing wait times, 2.27 (2 min), 1.03 (3 min), 0.67 (4 min) and 0.58 (5 min). More patients were willing to receive further IVI with increasing wait times, 92% (2 min), 97% (3 and 4 min), and 100% (5 min). These differences were statistically significant at each time interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longer wait times post-SCA were associated with better anaesthetic effect and higher patient acceptance to continue receiving IVI. The most marked difference was observed between 2- and 3-min groups. Based on our findings, a minimum wait time of 3 min should be recommended as the group had reported acceptably low pain scores (1.03) while maintaining high patient satisfaction (97%).</p>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomised Controlled Trial: Influence of Subconjunctival Anaesthesia Duration on Pain Perception During Intravitreal Injections.\",\"authors\":\"Jiyeon Kim, Louis S Han, Logan Robinson, Tafadzwa Young-Zvandasara\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ceo.14579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intravitreal injection (IVI) is one of the most performed vitreoretinal procedures in ophthalmology. Subconjunctival anaesthesia (SCA) with 2% lidocaine is a commonly used modality to reduce procedural pain and patient distress. Currently, there is no unifying recommended wait time between SCA and IVI. The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal wait time between the two, whilst maintaining clinical efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-blinded randomised clinical trial. Two hundred and forty patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups: wait time of 2, 3, 4 or 5 min. The primary outcome was pain level graded by the patient on a 10-point visual analogue scale. The secondary outcome was the willingness to receive further IVI with the current pain level. Data points were collected on patient demographics and characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean pain scores showed a decreasing trend with increasing wait times, 2.27 (2 min), 1.03 (3 min), 0.67 (4 min) and 0.58 (5 min). More patients were willing to receive further IVI with increasing wait times, 92% (2 min), 97% (3 and 4 min), and 100% (5 min). These differences were statistically significant at each time interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longer wait times post-SCA were associated with better anaesthetic effect and higher patient acceptance to continue receiving IVI. The most marked difference was observed between 2- and 3-min groups. Based on our findings, a minimum wait time of 3 min should be recommended as the group had reported acceptably low pain scores (1.03) while maintaining high patient satisfaction (97%).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14579\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:玻璃体内注射(IVI)是眼科应用最多的玻璃体视网膜手术之一。结膜下麻醉(SCA)与2%利多卡因是一种常用的方式,以减少手术疼痛和病人的痛苦。目前,SCA和IVI之间没有统一的推荐等待时间。本研究的目的是确定两者之间的最佳等待时间,同时保持临床效率。方法:单盲随机临床试验。240名患者被随机分为四组:等待时间为2分钟、3分钟、4分钟或5分钟。主要结果是患者在10分视觉模拟量表上对疼痛水平进行分级。次要结果是在当前疼痛水平下接受进一步静脉注射的意愿。收集患者人口统计学和特征的数据点。结果:平均疼痛评分随等待时间的增加呈下降趋势,分别为2.27 (2 min)、1.03 (3 min)、0.67 (4 min)和0.58 (5 min)。随着等待时间的增加,更多的患者愿意接受进一步的IVI, 92%(2分钟),97%(3和4分钟)和100%(5分钟)。这些差异在每个时间间隔内都具有统计学意义。结论:sca后等待时间越长,麻醉效果越好,患者对继续静脉注射的接受程度越高。2分钟组和3分钟组的差异最为显著。根据我们的研究结果,建议最小等待时间为3分钟,因为该组报告了可接受的低疼痛评分(1.03),同时保持了较高的患者满意度(97%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomised Controlled Trial: Influence of Subconjunctival Anaesthesia Duration on Pain Perception During Intravitreal Injections.

Background: The intravitreal injection (IVI) is one of the most performed vitreoretinal procedures in ophthalmology. Subconjunctival anaesthesia (SCA) with 2% lidocaine is a commonly used modality to reduce procedural pain and patient distress. Currently, there is no unifying recommended wait time between SCA and IVI. The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal wait time between the two, whilst maintaining clinical efficiency.

Methods: Single-blinded randomised clinical trial. Two hundred and forty patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups: wait time of 2, 3, 4 or 5 min. The primary outcome was pain level graded by the patient on a 10-point visual analogue scale. The secondary outcome was the willingness to receive further IVI with the current pain level. Data points were collected on patient demographics and characteristics.

Results: The mean pain scores showed a decreasing trend with increasing wait times, 2.27 (2 min), 1.03 (3 min), 0.67 (4 min) and 0.58 (5 min). More patients were willing to receive further IVI with increasing wait times, 92% (2 min), 97% (3 and 4 min), and 100% (5 min). These differences were statistically significant at each time interval.

Conclusion: Longer wait times post-SCA were associated with better anaesthetic effect and higher patient acceptance to continue receiving IVI. The most marked difference was observed between 2- and 3-min groups. Based on our findings, a minimum wait time of 3 min should be recommended as the group had reported acceptably low pain scores (1.03) while maintaining high patient satisfaction (97%).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信