{"title":"安大略的兄弟们:职业变化的趋势和模式。","authors":"Jeremy M Needle, Sali A Tagliamonte","doi":"10.1177/00754242251341318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study tracks the use of familiarizer vocatives across the twentieth century in Ontario, Canada from a corpus comprising 11 million words of conversational interviews from individuals in eighteen communities, born between the 1880s and the 2000s. Vocatives are a richly variable grammatical category which are strongly tied to their sociolinguistic context. We focus here on the sub-category of familiarizers for birth years 1950-2004, which in these materials are almost entirely dominated by <i>man</i>, <i>buddy</i>, and <i>dude</i>. We extracted and coded several thousand vocative tokens, yielding 467 familiarizers. Random Forest modeling shows significant effects of birth year, gender, and community; but not education nor occupation. The dominant familiarizer <i>man</i> declines with the rise of <i>buddy</i> (outside Toronto) and <i>dude</i> (especially inside Toronto). Women use these incoming forms more than men do, perhaps as alternatives to the masculine-associated form <i>man</i>. The results show rapid change for familiarizers in patterns which parallel longstanding sociolinguistic principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":51803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Linguistics","volume":"53 2","pages":"107-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Buddies</i>, <i>Dudes</i>, and <i>Bros</i> of Ontario: Trends and Patterns of Vocative Change.\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy M Needle, Sali A Tagliamonte\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00754242251341318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study tracks the use of familiarizer vocatives across the twentieth century in Ontario, Canada from a corpus comprising 11 million words of conversational interviews from individuals in eighteen communities, born between the 1880s and the 2000s. Vocatives are a richly variable grammatical category which are strongly tied to their sociolinguistic context. We focus here on the sub-category of familiarizers for birth years 1950-2004, which in these materials are almost entirely dominated by <i>man</i>, <i>buddy</i>, and <i>dude</i>. We extracted and coded several thousand vocative tokens, yielding 467 familiarizers. Random Forest modeling shows significant effects of birth year, gender, and community; but not education nor occupation. The dominant familiarizer <i>man</i> declines with the rise of <i>buddy</i> (outside Toronto) and <i>dude</i> (especially inside Toronto). Women use these incoming forms more than men do, perhaps as alternatives to the masculine-associated form <i>man</i>. The results show rapid change for familiarizers in patterns which parallel longstanding sociolinguistic principles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of English Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"53 2\",\"pages\":\"107-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of English Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242251341318\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242251341318","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Buddies, Dudes, and Bros of Ontario: Trends and Patterns of Vocative Change.
This study tracks the use of familiarizer vocatives across the twentieth century in Ontario, Canada from a corpus comprising 11 million words of conversational interviews from individuals in eighteen communities, born between the 1880s and the 2000s. Vocatives are a richly variable grammatical category which are strongly tied to their sociolinguistic context. We focus here on the sub-category of familiarizers for birth years 1950-2004, which in these materials are almost entirely dominated by man, buddy, and dude. We extracted and coded several thousand vocative tokens, yielding 467 familiarizers. Random Forest modeling shows significant effects of birth year, gender, and community; but not education nor occupation. The dominant familiarizer man declines with the rise of buddy (outside Toronto) and dude (especially inside Toronto). Women use these incoming forms more than men do, perhaps as alternatives to the masculine-associated form man. The results show rapid change for familiarizers in patterns which parallel longstanding sociolinguistic principles.
期刊介绍:
Journal of English Linguistics: The Editor invites submissions on the modern and historical periods of the English language. JEngL normally publishes synchronic and diachronic studies on subjects from Old and Middle English to modern English grammar, corpus linguistics, and dialectology. Other topics such as language contact, pidgins/creoles, or stylistics, are acceptable if the article focuses on the English language. Articless normally range from ten to twenty-five pages in typescript. JEngL reviews titles in general and historical linguistics, language variation, socio-linguistics, and dialectology for an international audience. Unsolicited reviews cannot be considered. Books for review and correspondence regarding reviews should be sent to the Editor.