{"title":"日文版精神疾病患者日常职业满意度与职业平衡的重测信度与构念效度。","authors":"Tomoe Ebisu, Tatsuhiko Masuzawa, Kayano Yotsumoto, Takeshi Hashimoto, Elisabeth Argentzell, Mona Eklund","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2025.2526427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Japan lacks efficient assessment tools for occupational balance (OB) in people with mental illness (MI).</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>We investigated the test-retest reliability and construct validity of a Japanese version of the Satisfaction with Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance (SDO-OB-J) for people with MI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SDO-OB-J interviews were conducted twice at a 2-week interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three participants joined. Regarding test-retest reliability, the weighted kappa coefficients were 0.75 for total activity level, 0.85 for total activity satisfaction, and 0.54 for general OB. Concerning construct validity, activity level and activity satisfaction had no significant correlation with global functioning, neurocognition, or mental-related quality of life (QOL). Physical-related QOL had a significant correlation only with activity satisfaction. General OB responses showed no neurocognitive differences, and the in-balance group had higher mental-related QOL than the under-occupied group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Weighted kappa coefficients were classified as substantial for activity level, almost perfect for activity satisfaction, and moderate for general OB. Activity level demonstrated discriminant validity with global functioning, neurocognition, and QOL. Activity satisfaction displayed discriminant validity with global functioning and neurocognition and convergent validity with physical-related QOL. General OB showed construct validity. The SDO-OB-J showed good test-retest reliability and construct validity in people with MI.</p><p><strong>Study registration id: </strong>UMIN000050730.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"32 1","pages":"2526427"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test-retest reliability and construct validity of a Japanese version of the Satisfaction with Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance for people with mental illness.\",\"authors\":\"Tomoe Ebisu, Tatsuhiko Masuzawa, Kayano Yotsumoto, Takeshi Hashimoto, Elisabeth Argentzell, Mona Eklund\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11038128.2025.2526427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Japan lacks efficient assessment tools for occupational balance (OB) in people with mental illness (MI).</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>We investigated the test-retest reliability and construct validity of a Japanese version of the Satisfaction with Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance (SDO-OB-J) for people with MI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SDO-OB-J interviews were conducted twice at a 2-week interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three participants joined. Regarding test-retest reliability, the weighted kappa coefficients were 0.75 for total activity level, 0.85 for total activity satisfaction, and 0.54 for general OB. Concerning construct validity, activity level and activity satisfaction had no significant correlation with global functioning, neurocognition, or mental-related quality of life (QOL). Physical-related QOL had a significant correlation only with activity satisfaction. General OB responses showed no neurocognitive differences, and the in-balance group had higher mental-related QOL than the under-occupied group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Weighted kappa coefficients were classified as substantial for activity level, almost perfect for activity satisfaction, and moderate for general OB. Activity level demonstrated discriminant validity with global functioning, neurocognition, and QOL. Activity satisfaction displayed discriminant validity with global functioning and neurocognition and convergent validity with physical-related QOL. General OB showed construct validity. The SDO-OB-J showed good test-retest reliability and construct validity in people with MI.</p><p><strong>Study registration id: </strong>UMIN000050730.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"2526427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2025.2526427\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2025.2526427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Test-retest reliability and construct validity of a Japanese version of the Satisfaction with Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance for people with mental illness.
Background: Japan lacks efficient assessment tools for occupational balance (OB) in people with mental illness (MI).
Aims/objectives: We investigated the test-retest reliability and construct validity of a Japanese version of the Satisfaction with Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance (SDO-OB-J) for people with MI.
Methods: SDO-OB-J interviews were conducted twice at a 2-week interval.
Results: Fifty-three participants joined. Regarding test-retest reliability, the weighted kappa coefficients were 0.75 for total activity level, 0.85 for total activity satisfaction, and 0.54 for general OB. Concerning construct validity, activity level and activity satisfaction had no significant correlation with global functioning, neurocognition, or mental-related quality of life (QOL). Physical-related QOL had a significant correlation only with activity satisfaction. General OB responses showed no neurocognitive differences, and the in-balance group had higher mental-related QOL than the under-occupied group.
Conclusions: Weighted kappa coefficients were classified as substantial for activity level, almost perfect for activity satisfaction, and moderate for general OB. Activity level demonstrated discriminant validity with global functioning, neurocognition, and QOL. Activity satisfaction displayed discriminant validity with global functioning and neurocognition and convergent validity with physical-related QOL. General OB showed construct validity. The SDO-OB-J showed good test-retest reliability and construct validity in people with MI.
期刊介绍：
The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries.
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
