Mona Maier, Daniel Powell, Peter Murchie, Julia L Allan
{"title":"医疗保健专业人员决策疲劳对医疗决策影响的系统综述。","authors":"Mona Maier, Daniel Powell, Peter Murchie, Julia L Allan","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2513916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decision fatigue is the tendency towards making less effortful decisions as the cumulative mental burden of effortful decision-making increases. Health professionals working long shifts may be particularly vulnerable to decision fatigue. This preregistered systematic review (Prospero ID = CRD42021260081, no external funding) aims to synthesise the empirical evidence on decision fatigue in the healthcare context. Systematic searches across eight databases identified 14,740 records. <i>N</i> = 82 studies (72 quantitative, 1 qualitative, 1 review, 8 expert discussions) met the inclusion criteria (health professionals/trainees; medical decisions over time; healthcare context; any design). Study quality was assessed with the MMAT or relevant JBI checklist. Narrative synthesis revealed that 45% of cases that quantitatively assessed the decision fatigue hypothesis provided evidence of significant decision fatigue effects across diagnostic, test ordering, prescribing, and therapeutic decisions. Expert discussions confirmed healthcare professionals' recognition of decision fatigue as an important phenomenon. However, decision fatigue was inconsistently defined and inadequately operationalised, reflecting limitations in current theoretical understanding of the phenomenon. To address this, we propose a new definition for greater conceptual clarity and more consistent operationalisation in future research.' Future studies should prioritise the development and testing of different theoretical explanations for decision fatigue to improve understanding and facilitate the development of appropriate interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-46"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of the effects of decision fatigue in healthcare professionals on medical decision-making.\",\"authors\":\"Mona Maier, Daniel Powell, Peter Murchie, Julia L Allan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17437199.2025.2513916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Decision fatigue is the tendency towards making less effortful decisions as the cumulative mental burden of effortful decision-making increases. Health professionals working long shifts may be particularly vulnerable to decision fatigue. This preregistered systematic review (Prospero ID = CRD42021260081, no external funding) aims to synthesise the empirical evidence on decision fatigue in the healthcare context. Systematic searches across eight databases identified 14,740 records. <i>N</i> = 82 studies (72 quantitative, 1 qualitative, 1 review, 8 expert discussions) met the inclusion criteria (health professionals/trainees; medical decisions over time; healthcare context; any design). Study quality was assessed with the MMAT or relevant JBI checklist. Narrative synthesis revealed that 45% of cases that quantitatively assessed the decision fatigue hypothesis provided evidence of significant decision fatigue effects across diagnostic, test ordering, prescribing, and therapeutic decisions. Expert discussions confirmed healthcare professionals' recognition of decision fatigue as an important phenomenon. However, decision fatigue was inconsistently defined and inadequately operationalised, reflecting limitations in current theoretical understanding of the phenomenon. To address this, we propose a new definition for greater conceptual clarity and more consistent operationalisation in future research.' Future studies should prioritise the development and testing of different theoretical explanations for decision fatigue to improve understanding and facilitate the development of appropriate interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2025.2513916\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2025.2513916","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
决策疲劳是指随着努力决策的累积精神负担的增加,做出不那么费力的决策的趋势。长时间轮班工作的卫生专业人员可能特别容易受到决策疲劳的影响。本预注册的系统评价(Prospero ID = CRD42021260081,无外部资助)旨在综合医疗保健背景下决策疲劳的经验证据。对8个数据库的系统搜索确定了14,740条记录。N = 82项研究(72项定量研究,1项定性研究,1项综述,8项专家讨论)符合纳入标准(卫生专业人员/学员;随着时间推移的医疗决定;医疗环境;任何设计)。采用MMAT或相关JBI检查表评估研究质量。叙事综合显示,定量评估决策疲劳假说的45%的案例提供了在诊断、测试排序、处方和治疗决策中显著的决策疲劳效应的证据。专家讨论证实了医疗保健专业人员认识到决策疲劳是一种重要的现象。然而,决策疲劳的定义不一致,操作也不充分,反映了当前对这一现象的理论理解的局限性。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个新的定义,以便在未来的研究中更清晰的概念和更一致的操作。”未来的研究应优先发展和测试决策疲劳的不同理论解释,以提高理解和促进适当干预措施的发展。
Systematic review of the effects of decision fatigue in healthcare professionals on medical decision-making.
Decision fatigue is the tendency towards making less effortful decisions as the cumulative mental burden of effortful decision-making increases. Health professionals working long shifts may be particularly vulnerable to decision fatigue. This preregistered systematic review (Prospero ID = CRD42021260081, no external funding) aims to synthesise the empirical evidence on decision fatigue in the healthcare context. Systematic searches across eight databases identified 14,740 records. N = 82 studies (72 quantitative, 1 qualitative, 1 review, 8 expert discussions) met the inclusion criteria (health professionals/trainees; medical decisions over time; healthcare context; any design). Study quality was assessed with the MMAT or relevant JBI checklist. Narrative synthesis revealed that 45% of cases that quantitatively assessed the decision fatigue hypothesis provided evidence of significant decision fatigue effects across diagnostic, test ordering, prescribing, and therapeutic decisions. Expert discussions confirmed healthcare professionals' recognition of decision fatigue as an important phenomenon. However, decision fatigue was inconsistently defined and inadequately operationalised, reflecting limitations in current theoretical understanding of the phenomenon. To address this, we propose a new definition for greater conceptual clarity and more consistent operationalisation in future research.' Future studies should prioritise the development and testing of different theoretical explanations for decision fatigue to improve understanding and facilitate the development of appropriate interventions.
期刊介绍:
The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.