根据什么标准,长时间和长距离的回程EMS应被认为是合乎道德的?

Q2 Social Sciences
Casey Patrick
{"title":"根据什么标准,长时间和长距离的回程EMS应被认为是合乎道德的?","authors":"Casey Patrick","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing and adequately documenting a patient's decision-making capacity is a responsibility and skill required of all emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. However, emergency medical technicians' and paramedics' training in a patient's refusal of EMS transport is often limited to evaluating that patient's alertness and orientation. This commentary argues that this approach is too narrow and outlines the obligation of prehospital care personnel to examine the patient thoroughly, obtain a complete set of vital signs, explain prospective risks and benefits of EMS transport, determine capacity, and express support for the patient. Finally, the commentary outlines what it means to appropriately document a prehospital interaction with a patient and express respect for decisions of patients with capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"27 7","pages":"E491-496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"According to Which Criteria Should a Return EMS Trip of Long Duration and Distance Be Deemed Ethically Justifiable?\",\"authors\":\"Casey Patrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/amajethics.2025.491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessing and adequately documenting a patient's decision-making capacity is a responsibility and skill required of all emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. However, emergency medical technicians' and paramedics' training in a patient's refusal of EMS transport is often limited to evaluating that patient's alertness and orientation. This commentary argues that this approach is too narrow and outlines the obligation of prehospital care personnel to examine the patient thoroughly, obtain a complete set of vital signs, explain prospective risks and benefits of EMS transport, determine capacity, and express support for the patient. Finally, the commentary outlines what it means to appropriately document a prehospital interaction with a patient and express respect for decisions of patients with capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"volume\":\"27 7\",\"pages\":\"E491-496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估和充分记录病人的决策能力是所有紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员的责任和技能。然而,紧急医疗技术人员和护理人员在病人拒绝EMS转运方面的培训往往仅限于评估病人的警觉性和定向。这篇评论认为,这种方法过于狭隘,并概述了院前护理人员的义务,即彻底检查患者,获得一整套生命体征,解释EMS运输的潜在风险和益处,确定能力,并表达对患者的支持。最后,评论概述了适当记录院前与患者的互动并表达对有能力的患者决定的尊重意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
According to Which Criteria Should a Return EMS Trip of Long Duration and Distance Be Deemed Ethically Justifiable?

Assessing and adequately documenting a patient's decision-making capacity is a responsibility and skill required of all emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. However, emergency medical technicians' and paramedics' training in a patient's refusal of EMS transport is often limited to evaluating that patient's alertness and orientation. This commentary argues that this approach is too narrow and outlines the obligation of prehospital care personnel to examine the patient thoroughly, obtain a complete set of vital signs, explain prospective risks and benefits of EMS transport, determine capacity, and express support for the patient. Finally, the commentary outlines what it means to appropriately document a prehospital interaction with a patient and express respect for decisions of patients with capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMA journal of ethics
AMA journal of ethics Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信