职前与在职教师对学生数学成功与挣扎的归因信念:第一见解。

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tugba Ocal, Selim Yavuz, Mehmet Fatih Ocal
{"title":"职前与在职教师对学生数学成功与挣扎的归因信念:第一见解。","authors":"Tugba Ocal, Selim Yavuz, Mehmet Fatih Ocal","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-03038-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the attributional beliefs of pre-service and in-service elementary and middle school mathematics teachers regarding students' success and struggles in mathematics. Utilizing a qualitative case study approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 in-service and pre-service teachers to explore their beliefs. Data were analyzed through content analysis, categorizing attributions into four main types: genetic, social, personal, and educational. The findings reveal that participants, selected through a convenience sampling method, expressed attributions related to both student success and struggle, reflecting the multifaceted nature of influences on students' mathematical performance. Pre-service teachers mentioned a broad range of attributions, including personal, social, and educational factors. In-service teachers tended to emphasize personal and genetic attributions, highlighting interest and innate ability as significant factors. While social and educational attributions, including family support and teacher quality, were discussed, they were less frequently highlighted by in-service teachers. This study highlights the importance of understanding teachers' beliefs, as these beliefs have the potential to shape instructional decisions and expectations. The findings suggest that future research should involve observational data and include larger sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"703"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre- and in-service teachers attribution beliefs for students' success and struggle in mathematics: first insights.\",\"authors\":\"Tugba Ocal, Selim Yavuz, Mehmet Fatih Ocal\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40359-025-03038-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates the attributional beliefs of pre-service and in-service elementary and middle school mathematics teachers regarding students' success and struggles in mathematics. Utilizing a qualitative case study approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 in-service and pre-service teachers to explore their beliefs. Data were analyzed through content analysis, categorizing attributions into four main types: genetic, social, personal, and educational. The findings reveal that participants, selected through a convenience sampling method, expressed attributions related to both student success and struggle, reflecting the multifaceted nature of influences on students' mathematical performance. Pre-service teachers mentioned a broad range of attributions, including personal, social, and educational factors. In-service teachers tended to emphasize personal and genetic attributions, highlighting interest and innate ability as significant factors. While social and educational attributions, including family support and teacher quality, were discussed, they were less frequently highlighted by in-service teachers. This study highlights the importance of understanding teachers' beliefs, as these beliefs have the potential to shape instructional decisions and expectations. The findings suggest that future research should involve observational data and include larger sample size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"703\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220069/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03038-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03038-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨职前与在职中小学数学教师对学生数学成功与挣扎的归因信念。采用定性案例研究方法,对28名在职教师和职前教师进行了半结构化访谈,以探讨他们的信念。通过内容分析对数据进行分析,将归因分为四种主要类型:遗传、社会、个人和教育。研究结果表明,通过方便抽样方法选择的参与者表达了与学生成功和奋斗相关的归因,反映了影响学生数学成绩的多方面性质。职前教师提到了广泛的归因,包括个人、社会和教育因素。在职教师倾向于强调个人归因和遗传归因,强调兴趣和先天能力是显著因素。虽然讨论了社会和教育因素,包括家庭支持和教师质量,但在职教师很少强调这些因素。这项研究强调了理解教师信念的重要性,因为这些信念有可能影响教学决策和期望。研究结果表明,未来的研究应该包括观察数据和更大的样本量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre- and in-service teachers attribution beliefs for students' success and struggle in mathematics: first insights.

This study investigates the attributional beliefs of pre-service and in-service elementary and middle school mathematics teachers regarding students' success and struggles in mathematics. Utilizing a qualitative case study approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 in-service and pre-service teachers to explore their beliefs. Data were analyzed through content analysis, categorizing attributions into four main types: genetic, social, personal, and educational. The findings reveal that participants, selected through a convenience sampling method, expressed attributions related to both student success and struggle, reflecting the multifaceted nature of influences on students' mathematical performance. Pre-service teachers mentioned a broad range of attributions, including personal, social, and educational factors. In-service teachers tended to emphasize personal and genetic attributions, highlighting interest and innate ability as significant factors. While social and educational attributions, including family support and teacher quality, were discussed, they were less frequently highlighted by in-service teachers. This study highlights the importance of understanding teachers' beliefs, as these beliefs have the potential to shape instructional decisions and expectations. The findings suggest that future research should involve observational data and include larger sample size.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信