中国青少年累积家庭风险因素与智能手机问题使用之间的年级差异

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ye Xu, Yi-Fan Lin, Liwen Yang, Herui Wu, Wenjian Lai, Ruiying Chen, Subinuer Yiming, Zhiyao Xin, Wanxin Wang, Ciyong Lu
{"title":"中国青少年累积家庭风险因素与智能手机问题使用之间的年级差异","authors":"Ye Xu, Yi-Fan Lin, Liwen Yang, Herui Wu, Wenjian Lai, Ruiying Chen, Subinuer Yiming, Zhiyao Xin, Wanxin Wang, Ciyong Lu","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02971-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, more adolescents are engaged in problematic smartphone use (PSU), but there is scant research on the impact of family risk factors on PSU. This study aimed to investigate the independent and cumulative effects of various family risk factors on adolescents' PSU and to determine whether these associations differ across grade level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the 2023 National School-based Chinese Adolescents Health Survey, with 20,361 adolescents (mean age: 15.0 [SD: 1.7] years) included. Family risk factors, PSU, and grade level were measured. A cumulative family risk (CFR) score was constructed by summing the number of family risk factors each adolescent experienced. The prevalence of PSU was estimated, and then logistic regression models were used to examine the association between family risk factors and PSU. Additionally, stratified analyses by grade level were conducted to explore differences in the above associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of PSU among adolescents was 25.8%. Significant associations were found between PSU and parental relationship, family function, parental education level, parental alcoholism, and childhood adversity, respectively. A clear dose-response relationship was observed between CFR and PSU (P for trend < 0.001), with adolescents exposed to four or more family risk factors showing the highest odds of PSU compared to those with no risk factors (OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 2.22-2.98). Furthermore, a significant interaction was found between CFR and grade level (P<sub>interaction</sub> <0.001), with middle school students showing a stronger association than high school students (P for ROR < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple family risk factors were independently and cumulatively associated with a higher risk of PSU, particularly among middle school students. These findings underscore the importance of addressing family-related risks and fostering emotionally supportive home environments to mitigate PSU in adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"706"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grade-level differences in the association between cumulative family risk factors and problematic smartphone use among Chinese adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Ye Xu, Yi-Fan Lin, Liwen Yang, Herui Wu, Wenjian Lai, Ruiying Chen, Subinuer Yiming, Zhiyao Xin, Wanxin Wang, Ciyong Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40359-025-02971-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, more adolescents are engaged in problematic smartphone use (PSU), but there is scant research on the impact of family risk factors on PSU. This study aimed to investigate the independent and cumulative effects of various family risk factors on adolescents' PSU and to determine whether these associations differ across grade level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the 2023 National School-based Chinese Adolescents Health Survey, with 20,361 adolescents (mean age: 15.0 [SD: 1.7] years) included. Family risk factors, PSU, and grade level were measured. A cumulative family risk (CFR) score was constructed by summing the number of family risk factors each adolescent experienced. The prevalence of PSU was estimated, and then logistic regression models were used to examine the association between family risk factors and PSU. Additionally, stratified analyses by grade level were conducted to explore differences in the above associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of PSU among adolescents was 25.8%. Significant associations were found between PSU and parental relationship, family function, parental education level, parental alcoholism, and childhood adversity, respectively. A clear dose-response relationship was observed between CFR and PSU (P for trend < 0.001), with adolescents exposed to four or more family risk factors showing the highest odds of PSU compared to those with no risk factors (OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 2.22-2.98). Furthermore, a significant interaction was found between CFR and grade level (P<sub>interaction</sub> <0.001), with middle school students showing a stronger association than high school students (P for ROR < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple family risk factors were independently and cumulatively associated with a higher risk of PSU, particularly among middle school students. These findings underscore the importance of addressing family-related risks and fostering emotionally supportive home environments to mitigate PSU in adolescents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"706\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220488/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02971-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02971-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在全球范围内,越来越多的青少年从事有问题的智能手机使用(PSU),但关于家庭危险因素对PSU的影响的研究很少。本研究旨在探讨各种家庭危险因素对青少年PSU的独立和累积影响,并确定这些关联是否在年级水平上存在差异。方法:数据来自《2023年全国校本青少年健康调查》,共纳入20361名青少年(平均年龄:15.0 [SD: 1.7]岁)。测量家庭危险因素、PSU和年级水平。累积家庭风险(CFR)评分是通过将每个青少年经历的家庭风险因素的数量相加来构建的。估计PSU的患病率,然后使用logistic回归模型检验家庭危险因素与PSU的关系。此外,按年级水平进行分层分析,以探讨上述关联的差异。结果:青少年PSU患病率为25.8%。PSU分别与父母关系、家庭功能、父母教育程度、父母酗酒、童年逆境有显著相关。结论:多个家庭危险因素与PSU的较高风险具有独立和累积的相关性,特别是在中学生中。这些发现强调了解决与家庭有关的风险和培养情感支持的家庭环境对于减轻青少年PSU的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Grade-level differences in the association between cumulative family risk factors and problematic smartphone use among Chinese adolescents.

Grade-level differences in the association between cumulative family risk factors and problematic smartphone use among Chinese adolescents.

Grade-level differences in the association between cumulative family risk factors and problematic smartphone use among Chinese adolescents.

Background: Globally, more adolescents are engaged in problematic smartphone use (PSU), but there is scant research on the impact of family risk factors on PSU. This study aimed to investigate the independent and cumulative effects of various family risk factors on adolescents' PSU and to determine whether these associations differ across grade level.

Methods: Data were drawn from the 2023 National School-based Chinese Adolescents Health Survey, with 20,361 adolescents (mean age: 15.0 [SD: 1.7] years) included. Family risk factors, PSU, and grade level were measured. A cumulative family risk (CFR) score was constructed by summing the number of family risk factors each adolescent experienced. The prevalence of PSU was estimated, and then logistic regression models were used to examine the association between family risk factors and PSU. Additionally, stratified analyses by grade level were conducted to explore differences in the above associations.

Results: The prevalence of PSU among adolescents was 25.8%. Significant associations were found between PSU and parental relationship, family function, parental education level, parental alcoholism, and childhood adversity, respectively. A clear dose-response relationship was observed between CFR and PSU (P for trend < 0.001), with adolescents exposed to four or more family risk factors showing the highest odds of PSU compared to those with no risk factors (OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 2.22-2.98). Furthermore, a significant interaction was found between CFR and grade level (Pinteraction <0.001), with middle school students showing a stronger association than high school students (P for ROR < 0.001).

Conclusions: Multiple family risk factors were independently and cumulatively associated with a higher risk of PSU, particularly among middle school students. These findings underscore the importance of addressing family-related risks and fostering emotionally supportive home environments to mitigate PSU in adolescents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信