大结肠切除或结肠切除术后纯种母马的繁殖成功率。

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Anja R Knudsen, Joseph S Marsh, Jannah L Pye
{"title":"大结肠切除或结肠切除术后纯种母马的繁殖成功率。","authors":"Anja R Knudsen, Joseph S Marsh, Jannah L Pye","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe reproductive performance in Thoroughbred broodmares post-large colon resection and to compare to performance post-colopexy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A single-institution retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>A total of 29 client-owned horses: post-large colon resection (LCR) n = 19, post-colopexy: n = 10.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thoroughbred broodmares that survived until discharge following LCR (Group R) or colopexy (Group P) between 2006 and 2023 were included. Clinical data were collected from clinical records. Breeding and foaling data were collected from the Australian and New Zealand Studbooks. Statistical analysis were performed using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact test using R software. Descriptive and postoperative reproductive data were compared between groups and a calculated nationwide average.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in any evaluated measurements of reproductive success between groups. In Group R, the first breeding season post-resection appeared less successful than the second (p = .03 [95% CI: 0.026-0.98]) or third (p = .03 [95% CI: 0.018-0.93]); however, these differences were not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (adjusted significance threshold p < .0083) and were not observed when unserved mares were excluded. Both groups achieved similar live foal/mare served percentages when compared to Racing Australia's published data (Group R: 60.5%, Group P: 68.2%, Racing Australia: 64.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No difference in reproductive success post-surgery was noted between techniques. Reproductive success is achievable post-large colon resection.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Postoperative reproductive success should not be a factor in intraoperative decision-making when determining which preventative strategy (LCR or colopexy) is utilized. Further larger studies are required to confirm these findings and investigate possible initial reduction in reproductive success post-LCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproductive success in Thoroughbred broodmares post large colon resection or colopexy.\",\"authors\":\"Anja R Knudsen, Joseph S Marsh, Jannah L Pye\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vsu.14304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe reproductive performance in Thoroughbred broodmares post-large colon resection and to compare to performance post-colopexy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A single-institution retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>A total of 29 client-owned horses: post-large colon resection (LCR) n = 19, post-colopexy: n = 10.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thoroughbred broodmares that survived until discharge following LCR (Group R) or colopexy (Group P) between 2006 and 2023 were included. Clinical data were collected from clinical records. Breeding and foaling data were collected from the Australian and New Zealand Studbooks. Statistical analysis were performed using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact test using R software. Descriptive and postoperative reproductive data were compared between groups and a calculated nationwide average.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in any evaluated measurements of reproductive success between groups. In Group R, the first breeding season post-resection appeared less successful than the second (p = .03 [95% CI: 0.026-0.98]) or third (p = .03 [95% CI: 0.018-0.93]); however, these differences were not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (adjusted significance threshold p < .0083) and were not observed when unserved mares were excluded. Both groups achieved similar live foal/mare served percentages when compared to Racing Australia's published data (Group R: 60.5%, Group P: 68.2%, Racing Australia: 64.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No difference in reproductive success post-surgery was noted between techniques. Reproductive success is achievable post-large colon resection.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Postoperative reproductive success should not be a factor in intraoperative decision-making when determining which preventative strategy (LCR or colopexy) is utilized. Further larger studies are required to confirm these findings and investigate possible initial reduction in reproductive success post-LCR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14304\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:观察纯种母马大结肠切除术后的生殖性能,并与结肠切除术后的生殖性能进行比较。研究设计:单机构回顾性研究。动物:29匹客户马:大结肠切除术(LCR)后19匹,结肠切除术后10匹。方法:选取2006 ~ 2023年LCR (R组)或colopexy (P组)术后存活至出院的纯种母马。临床资料从临床记录中收集。育种和产驹数据收集自澳大利亚和新西兰的studbook。统计分析采用Mann-Whitney U, Fisher精确检验采用R软件。描述性和术后生殖数据在组间进行比较,并计算全国平均值。结果:两组之间的生殖成功率评估指标均无差异。在R组,切除后第一个繁殖季节的成功率低于第二个繁殖季节(p =。03 [95% CI: 0.026-0.98])或第三(p =。03 [95% ci: 0.018-0.93]);然而,经Bonferroni多重比较校正后,这些差异无统计学意义(调整显著性阈值p)。结论:两种技术在术后生殖成功率方面无差异。大结肠切除术后生殖成功是可以实现的。临床意义:在决定采用何种预防策略(LCR或colopexy)时,术后生殖成功不应成为术中决策的一个因素。需要进一步进行更大规模的研究来证实这些发现,并调查lcr后生殖成功率可能出现的初步下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reproductive success in Thoroughbred broodmares post large colon resection or colopexy.

Objective: To describe reproductive performance in Thoroughbred broodmares post-large colon resection and to compare to performance post-colopexy.

Study design: A single-institution retrospective study.

Animals: A total of 29 client-owned horses: post-large colon resection (LCR) n = 19, post-colopexy: n = 10.

Methods: Thoroughbred broodmares that survived until discharge following LCR (Group R) or colopexy (Group P) between 2006 and 2023 were included. Clinical data were collected from clinical records. Breeding and foaling data were collected from the Australian and New Zealand Studbooks. Statistical analysis were performed using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact test using R software. Descriptive and postoperative reproductive data were compared between groups and a calculated nationwide average.

Results: There were no differences in any evaluated measurements of reproductive success between groups. In Group R, the first breeding season post-resection appeared less successful than the second (p = .03 [95% CI: 0.026-0.98]) or third (p = .03 [95% CI: 0.018-0.93]); however, these differences were not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (adjusted significance threshold p < .0083) and were not observed when unserved mares were excluded. Both groups achieved similar live foal/mare served percentages when compared to Racing Australia's published data (Group R: 60.5%, Group P: 68.2%, Racing Australia: 64.3%).

Conclusion: No difference in reproductive success post-surgery was noted between techniques. Reproductive success is achievable post-large colon resection.

Clinical significance: Postoperative reproductive success should not be a factor in intraoperative decision-making when determining which preventative strategy (LCR or colopexy) is utilized. Further larger studies are required to confirm these findings and investigate possible initial reduction in reproductive success post-LCR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信