使用QuantiFERON监测法预测实体器官和造血细胞移植受者的临床结果:范围综述。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Bradley J Gardiner, Roy F Chemaly, Vladyslav Nikolayevskyy, Riccardo Alagna, Davide Manissero, Camille N Kotton
{"title":"使用QuantiFERON监测法预测实体器官和造血细胞移植受者的临床结果:范围综述。","authors":"Bradley J Gardiner, Roy F Chemaly, Vladyslav Nikolayevskyy, Riccardo Alagna, Davide Manissero, Camille N Kotton","doi":"10.1111/tid.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>QuantiFERON Monitor (QFM) is an interferon-gamma release assay designed to provide a global measure of innate and adaptive cell-mediated immune function. We performed a scoping review to explore published evidence on the ability of QFM to predict clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases and included studies reporting QFM values and the incidence of infection and/or organ rejection or graft-versus-host disease (GvHD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen publications (9 SOT, 4 HCT) were included. Among SOT studies, infection (n = 8), rejection (n = 3), mortality (n = 2), and immunosuppression regimens (n = 7) were assessed as outcomes; low QFM values were associated with increased infection risk in 7/8 studies. Correlations were also identified between immunosuppression regimens and QFM results in 6/7 studies. No clear relationships between QFM values and rejection or mortality could be determined, possibly due to the low number of events reported. Infection (n = 4), GvHD (n = 3), and mortality (n = 1) were assessed in the HCT studies, with 3/4 reporting an association between low QFM values and infection. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the transplant populations, outcome measures and definitions, QFM thresholds, and timing of sample collection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available data suggest that QFM may be able to identify overly immunosuppressed individuals at higher risk of infection; additional studies are needed to further evaluate its predictive utility in transplant and other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of the QuantiFERON Monitor Assay to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Bradley J Gardiner, Roy F Chemaly, Vladyslav Nikolayevskyy, Riccardo Alagna, Davide Manissero, Camille N Kotton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tid.70074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>QuantiFERON Monitor (QFM) is an interferon-gamma release assay designed to provide a global measure of innate and adaptive cell-mediated immune function. We performed a scoping review to explore published evidence on the ability of QFM to predict clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases and included studies reporting QFM values and the incidence of infection and/or organ rejection or graft-versus-host disease (GvHD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen publications (9 SOT, 4 HCT) were included. Among SOT studies, infection (n = 8), rejection (n = 3), mortality (n = 2), and immunosuppression regimens (n = 7) were assessed as outcomes; low QFM values were associated with increased infection risk in 7/8 studies. Correlations were also identified between immunosuppression regimens and QFM results in 6/7 studies. No clear relationships between QFM values and rejection or mortality could be determined, possibly due to the low number of events reported. Infection (n = 4), GvHD (n = 3), and mortality (n = 1) were assessed in the HCT studies, with 3/4 reporting an association between low QFM values and infection. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the transplant populations, outcome measures and definitions, QFM thresholds, and timing of sample collection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available data suggest that QFM may be able to identify overly immunosuppressed individuals at higher risk of infection; additional studies are needed to further evaluate its predictive utility in transplant and other settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416346/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70074\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:QuantiFERON Monitor (QFM)是一种干扰素γ释放试验,旨在提供先天和适应性细胞介导的免疫功能的全局测量。我们对QFM预测实体器官移植(SOT)和同种异体造血细胞移植(HCT)受者临床结果的能力进行了范围综述,以探索已发表的证据。方法:使用Embase、Cochrane和PubMed数据库进行文献检索,包括报道QFM值和感染和/或器官排斥或移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)发生率的研究。结果:纳入文献13篇(SOT 9篇,HCT 4篇)。在SOT研究中,感染(n = 8)、排斥(n = 3)、死亡率(n = 2)和免疫抑制方案(n = 7)被评估为结局;在7/8的研究中,低QFM值与感染风险增加有关。在6/7的研究中也发现了免疫抑制方案与QFM结果之间的相关性。QFM值与拒收或死亡率之间没有明确的关系,可能是由于报告的事件数量较少。在HCT研究中评估了感染(n = 4)、GvHD (n = 3)和死亡率(n = 1),其中3/4报告了低QFM值与感染之间的关联。移植人群、结果测量和定义、QFM阈值和样本采集时间存在高度异质性。结论:现有数据表明,QFM可能能够识别出感染风险较高的过度免疫抑制个体;需要进一步的研究来进一步评估其在移植和其他情况下的预测效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of the QuantiFERON Monitor Assay to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Scoping Review.

Use of the QuantiFERON Monitor Assay to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Scoping Review.

Use of the QuantiFERON Monitor Assay to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Scoping Review.

Background: QuantiFERON Monitor (QFM) is an interferon-gamma release assay designed to provide a global measure of innate and adaptive cell-mediated immune function. We performed a scoping review to explore published evidence on the ability of QFM to predict clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases and included studies reporting QFM values and the incidence of infection and/or organ rejection or graft-versus-host disease (GvHD).

Results: Thirteen publications (9 SOT, 4 HCT) were included. Among SOT studies, infection (n = 8), rejection (n = 3), mortality (n = 2), and immunosuppression regimens (n = 7) were assessed as outcomes; low QFM values were associated with increased infection risk in 7/8 studies. Correlations were also identified between immunosuppression regimens and QFM results in 6/7 studies. No clear relationships between QFM values and rejection or mortality could be determined, possibly due to the low number of events reported. Infection (n = 4), GvHD (n = 3), and mortality (n = 1) were assessed in the HCT studies, with 3/4 reporting an association between low QFM values and infection. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the transplant populations, outcome measures and definitions, QFM thresholds, and timing of sample collection.

Conclusions: The available data suggest that QFM may be able to identify overly immunosuppressed individuals at higher risk of infection; additional studies are needed to further evaluate its predictive utility in transplant and other settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信