氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮预防阿片类药物引起的咳嗽的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kuo-Chuan Hung, Ting-Sian Yu, Chih-Wei Hsu, Wei-Cheng Liu, Jheng-Yan Wu, Shu-Wei Liao, Chien-Ming Lin, I-Wen Chen
{"title":"氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮预防阿片类药物引起的咳嗽的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kuo-Chuan Hung, Ting-Sian Yu, Chih-Wei Hsu, Wei-Cheng Liu, Jheng-Yan Wu, Shu-Wei Liao, Chien-Ming Lin, I-Wen Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02886-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid-induced cough (OIC) is a common side effect during anesthetic induction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ketamine/esketamine in preventing OIC during anesthetic induction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from inception through December 2024 for randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy of ketamine/esketamine in preventing OIC (Registration: INPLASY2024120102). Studies were included if they: (1) evaluated surgical patients receiving short-acting opioids (e.g., fentanyl) during anesthetic induction; (2) compared ketamine or esketamine against placebo/no treatment; and (3) reported OIC incidence. Studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcome was the overall incidence of OIC within 3 min after opioids administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve trials involving ketamine (nine trials) and esketamine (three trials) were analyzed. Notably, both agents significantly reduced the overall incidence of OIC compared to placebo (RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.22-0.41; p < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 61%, moderate certainty). All studies demonstrated low risk of bias across all domains for primary outcome. These agents also demonstrated efficacy against mild cough (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.59, high certainty) and moderate-to-severe cough (RR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.18-0.38, moderate certainty). The intervention delayed cough onset by 2.77 s (95% CI: 1.25-4.29, moderate certainty) and showed mild improvement in oxygen saturation (MD: 0.55%, 95% CI: 0.15-0.95, high certainty) without significant effects on heart rate or blood pressure. Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent benefits across adult and pediatric populations, as well as between ketamine and esketamine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that ketamine and esketamine are effective in reducing OIC during anesthetic induction. However, given the short delay in cough onset and mild improvements in oxygen saturation, the clinical significance of these findings may be limited in routine practice. Their use may be most beneficial in selected patients at risk of OIC-related complications. Further research is warranted to assess their value in high-risk populations and their role in combination prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"131"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of ketamine and esketamine for preventing opioid-induced cough: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Kuo-Chuan Hung, Ting-Sian Yu, Chih-Wei Hsu, Wei-Cheng Liu, Jheng-Yan Wu, Shu-Wei Liao, Chien-Ming Lin, I-Wen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02886-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid-induced cough (OIC) is a common side effect during anesthetic induction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ketamine/esketamine in preventing OIC during anesthetic induction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from inception through December 2024 for randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy of ketamine/esketamine in preventing OIC (Registration: INPLASY2024120102). Studies were included if they: (1) evaluated surgical patients receiving short-acting opioids (e.g., fentanyl) during anesthetic induction; (2) compared ketamine or esketamine against placebo/no treatment; and (3) reported OIC incidence. Studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcome was the overall incidence of OIC within 3 min after opioids administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve trials involving ketamine (nine trials) and esketamine (three trials) were analyzed. Notably, both agents significantly reduced the overall incidence of OIC compared to placebo (RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.22-0.41; p < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 61%, moderate certainty). All studies demonstrated low risk of bias across all domains for primary outcome. These agents also demonstrated efficacy against mild cough (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.59, high certainty) and moderate-to-severe cough (RR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.18-0.38, moderate certainty). The intervention delayed cough onset by 2.77 s (95% CI: 1.25-4.29, moderate certainty) and showed mild improvement in oxygen saturation (MD: 0.55%, 95% CI: 0.15-0.95, high certainty) without significant effects on heart rate or blood pressure. Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent benefits across adult and pediatric populations, as well as between ketamine and esketamine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that ketamine and esketamine are effective in reducing OIC during anesthetic induction. However, given the short delay in cough onset and mild improvements in oxygen saturation, the clinical significance of these findings may be limited in routine practice. Their use may be most beneficial in selected patients at risk of OIC-related complications. Further research is warranted to assess their value in high-risk populations and their role in combination prevention strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211305/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02886-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02886-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿片类药物诱发咳嗽(OIC)是麻醉诱导过程中常见的副作用。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评价氯胺酮/艾氯胺酮在麻醉诱导过程中预防OIC的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索Medline、Embase、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar,检索氯胺酮/艾氯胺酮预防OIC疗效的随机对照试验(注册号:INPLASY2024120102)。纳入以下研究:(1)评估麻醉诱导期间接受短效阿片类药物(如芬太尼)的手术患者;(2)氯胺酮或艾氯胺酮与安慰剂/无治疗的比较;(3)报告的OIC发病率。使用Cochrane风险偏倚2.0工具对研究进行评估。随机效应荟萃分析采用二分结局的风险比(RR)和连续结局的平均差异(MD),置信区间为95%。主要结局是阿片类药物给药后3分钟内OIC的总发生率。结果:共分析氯胺酮(9项)和艾氯胺酮(3项)12项试验。值得注意的是,与安慰剂相比,两种药物都显著降低了OIC的总发病率(RR: 0.30;95% ci: 0.22-0.41;P 2 = 61%,中等确定性)。所有的研究都证明了主要结果在所有领域的低偏倚风险。这些药物对轻度咳嗽(RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.59,高确定性)和中重度咳嗽(RR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.18-0.38,中等确定性)也有疗效。干预使咳嗽发作延迟2.77 s (95% CI: 1.25-4.29,中等确定性),并显示轻度改善氧饱和度(MD: 0.55%, 95% CI: 0.15-0.95,高确定性),对心率或血压无显著影响。亚组分析证实了在成人和儿童人群以及氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮之间的一致益处。结论:氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮可有效降低麻醉诱导过程中的OIC。然而,考虑到咳嗽发作的短暂延迟和氧饱和度的轻微改善,这些发现的临床意义在常规实践中可能有限。在有oic相关并发症风险的特定患者中使用它们可能是最有益的。有必要进一步研究以评估它们在高危人群中的价值及其在联合预防策略中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of ketamine and esketamine for preventing opioid-induced cough: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Opioid-induced cough (OIC) is a common side effect during anesthetic induction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ketamine/esketamine in preventing OIC during anesthetic induction.

Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from inception through December 2024 for randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy of ketamine/esketamine in preventing OIC (Registration: INPLASY2024120102). Studies were included if they: (1) evaluated surgical patients receiving short-acting opioids (e.g., fentanyl) during anesthetic induction; (2) compared ketamine or esketamine against placebo/no treatment; and (3) reported OIC incidence. Studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcome was the overall incidence of OIC within 3 min after opioids administration.

Results: Twelve trials involving ketamine (nine trials) and esketamine (three trials) were analyzed. Notably, both agents significantly reduced the overall incidence of OIC compared to placebo (RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.22-0.41; p < 0.00001, I2 = 61%, moderate certainty). All studies demonstrated low risk of bias across all domains for primary outcome. These agents also demonstrated efficacy against mild cough (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.59, high certainty) and moderate-to-severe cough (RR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.18-0.38, moderate certainty). The intervention delayed cough onset by 2.77 s (95% CI: 1.25-4.29, moderate certainty) and showed mild improvement in oxygen saturation (MD: 0.55%, 95% CI: 0.15-0.95, high certainty) without significant effects on heart rate or blood pressure. Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent benefits across adult and pediatric populations, as well as between ketamine and esketamine.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ketamine and esketamine are effective in reducing OIC during anesthetic induction. However, given the short delay in cough onset and mild improvements in oxygen saturation, the clinical significance of these findings may be limited in routine practice. Their use may be most beneficial in selected patients at risk of OIC-related complications. Further research is warranted to assess their value in high-risk populations and their role in combination prevention strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信