用于预测髋部骨折术后患者死亡率的简洁且可解释的机器学习。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Fouad Trad, Bassel Isber, Ryan Yammine, Khaled Hatoum, Dana Obeid, Mohammad Chahine, Rachid Haidar, Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan, Ali Chehab
{"title":"用于预测髋部骨折术后患者死亡率的简洁且可解释的机器学习。","authors":"Fouad Trad, Bassel Isber, Ryan Yammine, Khaled Hatoum, Dana Obeid, Mohammad Chahine, Rachid Haidar, Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan, Ali Chehab","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-98713-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hip fractures among the elderly population continue to present significant risks and high mortality rates despite advancements in surgical procedures. In this study, we developed machine learning (ML) algorithms to estimate 30-day mortality risk post-hip fracture surgery in the elderly using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP 2012-2017, n = 62,492 patients). Our approach involves two models: one estimating the patients' 30-day mortality risk based on pre-operative conditions, and another considering both pre-operative and post-operative factors. We performed comprehensive data cleaning and preprocessing, then applied tenfold cross-validation with randomized search to the training set to identify optimal hyperparameters for various machine learning models. We used logistic regression, Naive Bayes, random forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, CatBoost, Gradient Boosting, and LightGBM. The models' performances were evaluated on the test set using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). The best pre-operative model was AdaBoost, achieving an AUC of 0.792 with 29 features (predictors), and the best post-operative model was CatBoost, achieving an AUC of 0.885 with 45 features. After modeling, we derived feature importance for each of the two models and decreased the number of features to reach a parsimonious highly performing model. The pre-operative model achieves an AUC of 0.725 with the eight most important features and the post-operative model achieves an AUC of 0.8529 with the six most important features. To ensure the models' decision-making is compatible with clinical decisions and common practices, we applied explainability techniques such as SHAP to reveal the patterns learned by the models. These patterns were found to be clinically plausible. In summary, our approach involving data preprocessing, model tuning, feature selection, and explainability achieved state-of-the-art performance in predicting 30-day mortality rates following hip fractures surgery using a limited set of features, making it highly applicable in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"22922"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12216216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parsimonious and explainable machine learning for predicting mortality in patients post hip fracture surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Fouad Trad, Bassel Isber, Ryan Yammine, Khaled Hatoum, Dana Obeid, Mohammad Chahine, Rachid Haidar, Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan, Ali Chehab\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-98713-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hip fractures among the elderly population continue to present significant risks and high mortality rates despite advancements in surgical procedures. In this study, we developed machine learning (ML) algorithms to estimate 30-day mortality risk post-hip fracture surgery in the elderly using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP 2012-2017, n = 62,492 patients). Our approach involves two models: one estimating the patients' 30-day mortality risk based on pre-operative conditions, and another considering both pre-operative and post-operative factors. We performed comprehensive data cleaning and preprocessing, then applied tenfold cross-validation with randomized search to the training set to identify optimal hyperparameters for various machine learning models. We used logistic regression, Naive Bayes, random forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, CatBoost, Gradient Boosting, and LightGBM. The models' performances were evaluated on the test set using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). The best pre-operative model was AdaBoost, achieving an AUC of 0.792 with 29 features (predictors), and the best post-operative model was CatBoost, achieving an AUC of 0.885 with 45 features. After modeling, we derived feature importance for each of the two models and decreased the number of features to reach a parsimonious highly performing model. The pre-operative model achieves an AUC of 0.725 with the eight most important features and the post-operative model achieves an AUC of 0.8529 with the six most important features. To ensure the models' decision-making is compatible with clinical decisions and common practices, we applied explainability techniques such as SHAP to reveal the patterns learned by the models. These patterns were found to be clinically plausible. In summary, our approach involving data preprocessing, model tuning, feature selection, and explainability achieved state-of-the-art performance in predicting 30-day mortality rates following hip fractures surgery using a limited set of features, making it highly applicable in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"22922\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12216216/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98713-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98713-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管外科手术技术有所进步,但老年人髋部骨折仍然存在重大风险和高死亡率。在这项研究中,我们开发了机器学习(ML)算法,利用国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP 2012-2017, n = 62,492例患者)的数据来估计老年人髋部骨折手术后30天的死亡率风险。我们的方法包括两个模型:一个是根据术前情况估计患者30天的死亡风险,另一个是考虑术前和术后因素。我们进行了全面的数据清洗和预处理,然后对训练集进行了十倍交叉验证和随机搜索,以确定各种机器学习模型的最佳超参数。我们使用了逻辑回归、朴素贝叶斯、随机森林、AdaBoost、XGBoost、CatBoost、梯度增强和LightGBM。利用接收机工作特性曲线下面积(Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, AUC)在测试集上对模型的性能进行评价。术前最佳模型为AdaBoost,有29个特征(预测因子),AUC为0.792;术后最佳模型为CatBoost,有45个特征,AUC为0.885。建模后,我们推导了两个模型的特征重要性,并减少了特征的数量,以达到一个简约的高性能模型。术前模型的8个最重要特征的AUC为0.725,术后模型的6个最重要特征的AUC为0.8529。为了确保模型的决策与临床决策和常规实践相一致,我们应用了SHAP等可解释性技术来揭示模型学习的模式。这些模式在临床上是合理的。总之,我们的方法包括数据预处理、模型调整、特征选择和可解释性,在使用有限的特征集预测髋部骨折手术后30天死亡率方面取得了最先进的表现,使其在临床环境中高度适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Parsimonious and explainable machine learning for predicting mortality in patients post hip fracture surgery.

Parsimonious and explainable machine learning for predicting mortality in patients post hip fracture surgery.

Parsimonious and explainable machine learning for predicting mortality in patients post hip fracture surgery.

Parsimonious and explainable machine learning for predicting mortality in patients post hip fracture surgery.

Hip fractures among the elderly population continue to present significant risks and high mortality rates despite advancements in surgical procedures. In this study, we developed machine learning (ML) algorithms to estimate 30-day mortality risk post-hip fracture surgery in the elderly using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP 2012-2017, n = 62,492 patients). Our approach involves two models: one estimating the patients' 30-day mortality risk based on pre-operative conditions, and another considering both pre-operative and post-operative factors. We performed comprehensive data cleaning and preprocessing, then applied tenfold cross-validation with randomized search to the training set to identify optimal hyperparameters for various machine learning models. We used logistic regression, Naive Bayes, random forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, CatBoost, Gradient Boosting, and LightGBM. The models' performances were evaluated on the test set using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). The best pre-operative model was AdaBoost, achieving an AUC of 0.792 with 29 features (predictors), and the best post-operative model was CatBoost, achieving an AUC of 0.885 with 45 features. After modeling, we derived feature importance for each of the two models and decreased the number of features to reach a parsimonious highly performing model. The pre-operative model achieves an AUC of 0.725 with the eight most important features and the post-operative model achieves an AUC of 0.8529 with the six most important features. To ensure the models' decision-making is compatible with clinical decisions and common practices, we applied explainability techniques such as SHAP to reveal the patterns learned by the models. These patterns were found to be clinically plausible. In summary, our approach involving data preprocessing, model tuning, feature selection, and explainability achieved state-of-the-art performance in predicting 30-day mortality rates following hip fractures surgery using a limited set of features, making it highly applicable in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信