基于专家启发和模糊集理论的TBM开挖风险管理可解释框架。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Kibeom Kwon, Minkyu Kang, Young Jin Shin, Byoungcheol Ahn, Hangseok Choi
{"title":"基于专家启发和模糊集理论的TBM开挖风险管理可解释框架。","authors":"Kibeom Kwon, Minkyu Kang, Young Jin Shin, Byoungcheol Ahn, Hangseok Choi","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-07514-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk management is essential for optimal decision-making during tunnel boring machine (TBM) excavation. Previous methods, however, have struggled with interpreting the uncertainties associated with TBM excavation and managing multiple concurrent adverse factors. This study proposes an interpretable risk management method that effectively addresses these uncertainties and concurrent sources. It employs an expert elicitation framework combined with fuzzy set theory to distribute the confidence levels of experts' evaluations across multiple classes. The resulting impact, probability, and risk are presented as distributions, allowing for a comprehensive interpretation of expert judgment trends, which reveals how uncertainties are distributed and identifies any dominant class or risk level. The proposed method was applied to a slurry shield TBM tunnel project, where most distributions showed no single dominant class or risk level due to significant uncertainties, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interpretation. Furthermore, the method effectively addressed increased probabilities and risks stemming from concurrent factors, in contrast to when these factors were considered individually. Comparative analysis demonstrated that even meaningful but minor responses can significantly influence the determination of risk levels through comprehensive interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"23030"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12215182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An interpretable framework for risk management in TBM excavation using expert elicitation integrated with fuzzy set theory.\",\"authors\":\"Kibeom Kwon, Minkyu Kang, Young Jin Shin, Byoungcheol Ahn, Hangseok Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-07514-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Risk management is essential for optimal decision-making during tunnel boring machine (TBM) excavation. Previous methods, however, have struggled with interpreting the uncertainties associated with TBM excavation and managing multiple concurrent adverse factors. This study proposes an interpretable risk management method that effectively addresses these uncertainties and concurrent sources. It employs an expert elicitation framework combined with fuzzy set theory to distribute the confidence levels of experts' evaluations across multiple classes. The resulting impact, probability, and risk are presented as distributions, allowing for a comprehensive interpretation of expert judgment trends, which reveals how uncertainties are distributed and identifies any dominant class or risk level. The proposed method was applied to a slurry shield TBM tunnel project, where most distributions showed no single dominant class or risk level due to significant uncertainties, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interpretation. Furthermore, the method effectively addressed increased probabilities and risks stemming from concurrent factors, in contrast to when these factors were considered individually. Comparative analysis demonstrated that even meaningful but minor responses can significantly influence the determination of risk levels through comprehensive interpretation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"23030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12215182/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07514-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07514-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风险管理是隧道掘进机开挖优化决策的关键。然而,以前的方法在解释与TBM开挖相关的不确定性和管理多个同时发生的不利因素方面遇到了困难。本研究提出一种可解释的风险管理方法,有效地解决这些不确定性和并发源。它采用专家启发框架结合模糊集理论,将专家评价的置信度分布到多个类中。由此产生的影响、概率和风险以分布的形式呈现,允许对专家判断趋势进行全面的解释,这揭示了不确定性是如何分布的,并确定了任何主导类别或风险水平。所提出的方法应用于一个浆体盾构隧道项目,由于存在重大的不确定性,大多数分布没有显示出单一的主导类别或风险水平,这强调了综合解释的必要性。此外,与单独考虑这些因素相比,该方法有效地解决了由并发因素引起的增加的概率和风险。对比分析表明,即使是有意义但较小的反应也可以通过综合解释显著影响风险水平的确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An interpretable framework for risk management in TBM excavation using expert elicitation integrated with fuzzy set theory.

Risk management is essential for optimal decision-making during tunnel boring machine (TBM) excavation. Previous methods, however, have struggled with interpreting the uncertainties associated with TBM excavation and managing multiple concurrent adverse factors. This study proposes an interpretable risk management method that effectively addresses these uncertainties and concurrent sources. It employs an expert elicitation framework combined with fuzzy set theory to distribute the confidence levels of experts' evaluations across multiple classes. The resulting impact, probability, and risk are presented as distributions, allowing for a comprehensive interpretation of expert judgment trends, which reveals how uncertainties are distributed and identifies any dominant class or risk level. The proposed method was applied to a slurry shield TBM tunnel project, where most distributions showed no single dominant class or risk level due to significant uncertainties, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interpretation. Furthermore, the method effectively addressed increased probabilities and risks stemming from concurrent factors, in contrast to when these factors were considered individually. Comparative analysis demonstrated that even meaningful but minor responses can significantly influence the determination of risk levels through comprehensive interpretation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信