Pamela J Anderson-Mahoney, Jenny Brook, Amy Rock Wohl, Jennifer Ewald, Ally R Avery, Lynn T Phan Vo, Jasmine Chau
{"title":"未完成的事业:制服中的甲醛暴露和美国纺织品法规的案例。","authors":"Pamela J Anderson-Mahoney, Jenny Brook, Amy Rock Wohl, Jennifer Ewald, Ally R Avery, Lynn T Phan Vo, Jasmine Chau","doi":"10.1515/reveh-2025-0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Formaldehyde is a known human allergen and irritant, yet health risks from exposure via treated textiles - especially occupational uniforms - remain underrecognized. This article combines a review of international literature and public data on formaldehyde sensitization rates and regulatory approaches with a study of airline employees exposed to formaldehyde-treated uniforms.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>A literature review was conducted to assess sensitization prevalence and regulatory frameworks across countries. Publicly available data suggest that countries with stricter formaldehyde limits in textiles tend to report lower population-level sensitization rates. To explore implications in the U.S., we assessed self-reported symptoms among 291 airline employees required to wear new uniforms containing 26-83 ppm of formaldehyde. Participants completed a health survey capturing symptoms before, during, and after uniform use. Results were compared to the 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Compared to the NHIS sample, uniformed airline employees reported significantly higher rates of asthma, anxiety, depression, and immune-related conditions. Time spent perspiring while wearing uniforms - a biologically relevant exposure proxy - was significantly associated with increased dermatologic symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>Even moderate levels of formaldehyde in occupational textiles can trigger adverse health effects under real-world wear conditions involving heat, friction, and perspiration. In the absence of enforceable U.S. regulations for formaldehyde in textiles, employers serve as the first line of defense. They must assess garment safety, consider vulnerable subpopulations, and take precautionary steps - such as requiring OEKO-TEX certification - to protect worker health.</p>","PeriodicalId":21165,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on Environmental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unfinished business: formaldehyde exposure from uniforms and the case for U.S. textile regulation.\",\"authors\":\"Pamela J Anderson-Mahoney, Jenny Brook, Amy Rock Wohl, Jennifer Ewald, Ally R Avery, Lynn T Phan Vo, Jasmine Chau\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/reveh-2025-0063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Formaldehyde is a known human allergen and irritant, yet health risks from exposure via treated textiles - especially occupational uniforms - remain underrecognized. This article combines a review of international literature and public data on formaldehyde sensitization rates and regulatory approaches with a study of airline employees exposed to formaldehyde-treated uniforms.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>A literature review was conducted to assess sensitization prevalence and regulatory frameworks across countries. Publicly available data suggest that countries with stricter formaldehyde limits in textiles tend to report lower population-level sensitization rates. To explore implications in the U.S., we assessed self-reported symptoms among 291 airline employees required to wear new uniforms containing 26-83 ppm of formaldehyde. Participants completed a health survey capturing symptoms before, during, and after uniform use. Results were compared to the 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Compared to the NHIS sample, uniformed airline employees reported significantly higher rates of asthma, anxiety, depression, and immune-related conditions. Time spent perspiring while wearing uniforms - a biologically relevant exposure proxy - was significantly associated with increased dermatologic symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>Even moderate levels of formaldehyde in occupational textiles can trigger adverse health effects under real-world wear conditions involving heat, friction, and perspiration. In the absence of enforceable U.S. regulations for formaldehyde in textiles, employers serve as the first line of defense. They must assess garment safety, consider vulnerable subpopulations, and take precautionary steps - such as requiring OEKO-TEX certification - to protect worker health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews on Environmental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews on Environmental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2025-0063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2025-0063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unfinished business: formaldehyde exposure from uniforms and the case for U.S. textile regulation.
Introduction: Formaldehyde is a known human allergen and irritant, yet health risks from exposure via treated textiles - especially occupational uniforms - remain underrecognized. This article combines a review of international literature and public data on formaldehyde sensitization rates and regulatory approaches with a study of airline employees exposed to formaldehyde-treated uniforms.
Content: A literature review was conducted to assess sensitization prevalence and regulatory frameworks across countries. Publicly available data suggest that countries with stricter formaldehyde limits in textiles tend to report lower population-level sensitization rates. To explore implications in the U.S., we assessed self-reported symptoms among 291 airline employees required to wear new uniforms containing 26-83 ppm of formaldehyde. Participants completed a health survey capturing symptoms before, during, and after uniform use. Results were compared to the 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and smoking status.
Summary: Compared to the NHIS sample, uniformed airline employees reported significantly higher rates of asthma, anxiety, depression, and immune-related conditions. Time spent perspiring while wearing uniforms - a biologically relevant exposure proxy - was significantly associated with increased dermatologic symptom severity.
Outlook: Even moderate levels of formaldehyde in occupational textiles can trigger adverse health effects under real-world wear conditions involving heat, friction, and perspiration. In the absence of enforceable U.S. regulations for formaldehyde in textiles, employers serve as the first line of defense. They must assess garment safety, consider vulnerable subpopulations, and take precautionary steps - such as requiring OEKO-TEX certification - to protect worker health.
期刊介绍:
Reviews on Environmental Health (REVEH) is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to fill the need for publication of review articles on hot topics in the field of environmental health. Reviews on Environmental Health aims to be an inspiring forum for scientists, environmentalists, physicians, engineers, and students who are concerned with aspects of human health, including quality of life, that are determined by physiological and psychosociological interactions between man and physical, chemical, biological, and social factors in the environment.
Reviews on Environmental Health is an important niche served by no other journal, that’s being a site where thoughtful reviews can be published on a variety of subjects related to both health and environment. One challenge is to bridge the research on environmental causes of disease with the clinical practice of medicine. Reviews on Environmental Health is a source of integrated information on environment and health subjects that will be of value to the broad scientific community, whether students, junior and senior professionals, or clinicians.