未完成的事业:制服中的甲醛暴露和美国纺织品法规的案例。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Pamela J Anderson-Mahoney, Jenny Brook, Amy Rock Wohl, Jennifer Ewald, Ally R Avery, Lynn T Phan Vo, Jasmine Chau
{"title":"未完成的事业:制服中的甲醛暴露和美国纺织品法规的案例。","authors":"Pamela J Anderson-Mahoney, Jenny Brook, Amy Rock Wohl, Jennifer Ewald, Ally R Avery, Lynn T Phan Vo, Jasmine Chau","doi":"10.1515/reveh-2025-0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Formaldehyde is a known human allergen and irritant, yet health risks from exposure via treated textiles - especially occupational uniforms - remain underrecognized. This article combines a review of international literature and public data on formaldehyde sensitization rates and regulatory approaches with a study of airline employees exposed to formaldehyde-treated uniforms.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>A literature review was conducted to assess sensitization prevalence and regulatory frameworks across countries. Publicly available data suggest that countries with stricter formaldehyde limits in textiles tend to report lower population-level sensitization rates. To explore implications in the U.S., we assessed self-reported symptoms among 291 airline employees required to wear new uniforms containing 26-83 ppm of formaldehyde. Participants completed a health survey capturing symptoms before, during, and after uniform use. Results were compared to the 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Compared to the NHIS sample, uniformed airline employees reported significantly higher rates of asthma, anxiety, depression, and immune-related conditions. Time spent perspiring while wearing uniforms - a biologically relevant exposure proxy - was significantly associated with increased dermatologic symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>Even moderate levels of formaldehyde in occupational textiles can trigger adverse health effects under real-world wear conditions involving heat, friction, and perspiration. In the absence of enforceable U.S. regulations for formaldehyde in textiles, employers serve as the first line of defense. They must assess garment safety, consider vulnerable subpopulations, and take precautionary steps - such as requiring OEKO-TEX certification - to protect worker health.</p>","PeriodicalId":21165,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on Environmental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unfinished business: formaldehyde exposure from uniforms and the case for U.S. textile regulation.\",\"authors\":\"Pamela J Anderson-Mahoney, Jenny Brook, Amy Rock Wohl, Jennifer Ewald, Ally R Avery, Lynn T Phan Vo, Jasmine Chau\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/reveh-2025-0063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Formaldehyde is a known human allergen and irritant, yet health risks from exposure via treated textiles - especially occupational uniforms - remain underrecognized. This article combines a review of international literature and public data on formaldehyde sensitization rates and regulatory approaches with a study of airline employees exposed to formaldehyde-treated uniforms.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>A literature review was conducted to assess sensitization prevalence and regulatory frameworks across countries. Publicly available data suggest that countries with stricter formaldehyde limits in textiles tend to report lower population-level sensitization rates. To explore implications in the U.S., we assessed self-reported symptoms among 291 airline employees required to wear new uniforms containing 26-83 ppm of formaldehyde. Participants completed a health survey capturing symptoms before, during, and after uniform use. Results were compared to the 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Compared to the NHIS sample, uniformed airline employees reported significantly higher rates of asthma, anxiety, depression, and immune-related conditions. Time spent perspiring while wearing uniforms - a biologically relevant exposure proxy - was significantly associated with increased dermatologic symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>Even moderate levels of formaldehyde in occupational textiles can trigger adverse health effects under real-world wear conditions involving heat, friction, and perspiration. In the absence of enforceable U.S. regulations for formaldehyde in textiles, employers serve as the first line of defense. They must assess garment safety, consider vulnerable subpopulations, and take precautionary steps - such as requiring OEKO-TEX certification - to protect worker health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews on Environmental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews on Environmental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2025-0063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2025-0063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:甲醛是一种已知的人类过敏原和刺激物,但通过处理过的纺织品(尤其是职业制服)接触甲醛的健康风险仍未得到充分认识。本文结合了对甲醛致敏率和监管方法的国际文献和公开数据的回顾,并对暴露于甲醛处理制服的航空公司员工进行了研究。内容:进行了一项文献综述,以评估各国的致敏率和监管框架。公开数据表明,纺织品中甲醛含量限制较严格的国家往往报告的人口致敏率较低。为了探索在美国的影响,我们评估了291名航空公司员工的自我报告症状,他们被要求穿着含有26-83 ppm甲醛的新制服。参与者完成了一项健康调查,记录了在统一使用之前、期间和之后的症状。结果与2020年全国健康访谈调查(NHIS)进行了比较,调整了年龄、性别、BMI和吸烟状况。总结:与NHIS样本相比,穿制服的航空公司员工报告的哮喘、焦虑、抑郁和免疫相关疾病的发病率明显更高。穿着制服时出汗的时间——一种生物学上相关的暴露代理——与皮肤症状严重程度的增加显著相关。展望:即使是中等水平的甲醛在职业性纺织品中也会在真实的穿着条件下引发不利的健康影响,包括热、摩擦和出汗。由于美国对纺织品中的甲醛缺乏可执行的法规,雇主充当了第一道防线。他们必须评估服装安全,考虑易受伤害的亚群体,并采取预防措施——例如要求获得OEKO-TEX认证——以保护工人健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unfinished business: formaldehyde exposure from uniforms and the case for U.S. textile regulation.

Introduction: Formaldehyde is a known human allergen and irritant, yet health risks from exposure via treated textiles - especially occupational uniforms - remain underrecognized. This article combines a review of international literature and public data on formaldehyde sensitization rates and regulatory approaches with a study of airline employees exposed to formaldehyde-treated uniforms.

Content: A literature review was conducted to assess sensitization prevalence and regulatory frameworks across countries. Publicly available data suggest that countries with stricter formaldehyde limits in textiles tend to report lower population-level sensitization rates. To explore implications in the U.S., we assessed self-reported symptoms among 291 airline employees required to wear new uniforms containing 26-83 ppm of formaldehyde. Participants completed a health survey capturing symptoms before, during, and after uniform use. Results were compared to the 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and smoking status.

Summary: Compared to the NHIS sample, uniformed airline employees reported significantly higher rates of asthma, anxiety, depression, and immune-related conditions. Time spent perspiring while wearing uniforms - a biologically relevant exposure proxy - was significantly associated with increased dermatologic symptom severity.

Outlook: Even moderate levels of formaldehyde in occupational textiles can trigger adverse health effects under real-world wear conditions involving heat, friction, and perspiration. In the absence of enforceable U.S. regulations for formaldehyde in textiles, employers serve as the first line of defense. They must assess garment safety, consider vulnerable subpopulations, and take precautionary steps - such as requiring OEKO-TEX certification - to protect worker health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews on Environmental Health
Reviews on Environmental Health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Reviews on Environmental Health (REVEH) is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to fill the need for publication of review articles on hot topics in the field of environmental health. Reviews on Environmental Health aims to be an inspiring forum for scientists, environmentalists, physicians, engineers, and students who are concerned with aspects of human health, including quality of life, that are determined by physiological and psychosociological interactions between man and physical, chemical, biological, and social factors in the environment. Reviews on Environmental Health is an important niche served by no other journal, that’s being a site where thoughtful reviews can be published on a variety of subjects related to both health and environment. One challenge is to bridge the research on environmental causes of disease with the clinical practice of medicine. Reviews on Environmental Health is a source of integrated information on environment and health subjects that will be of value to the broad scientific community, whether students, junior and senior professionals, or clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信