颅内硬脑膜动静脉瘘有或无颅动脉供应:治疗结果分析。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Xin Su, Yongjie Ma, Zihao Song, Huiwei Liu, Chao Zhang, Huishen Pang, Yiguang Chen, Mingyue Huang, Jiaxing Yu, Liyong Sun, Guilin Li, Tao Hong, Ming Ye, Peng Hu, Peng Zhang, Hongqi Zhang
{"title":"颅内硬脑膜动静脉瘘有或无颅动脉供应:治疗结果分析。","authors":"Xin Su, Yongjie Ma, Zihao Song, Huiwei Liu, Chao Zhang, Huishen Pang, Yiguang Chen, Mingyue Huang, Jiaxing Yu, Liyong Sun, Guilin Li, Tao Hong, Ming Ye, Peng Hu, Peng Zhang, Hongqi Zhang","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The prevalence of pial arterial supply (PAS) to intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) and its implications for the management of these fistulas have been limited to relatively small cohort studies and remain somewhat controversial. We conducted a retrospective study to characterize PAS in DAVFs and explore its implications for treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients evaluated over a 21-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Angiograms were examined to characterize the angioarchitecture of DAVFs and identify the presence of PAS. PAS was classified into 2 types: dilated preexisting dural branches and pure pial supply. Baseline characteristics, treatment approaches, and treatment and follow-up outcomes were compared between the DAVF cohorts with and without PAS. To minimize patient selection bias, the 2 cohorts were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cohort, 259 out of 1101 patients (23.5%) exhibited an additional PAS. Multivariate analysis identified 7 independent predictors of PAS: younger age (P < .001), longer disease duration (P = .021), multiple DAVFs (P < .001), tentorial DAVFs (P < .001), transverse-sigmoid sinus DAVFs (P < .001), and the presence of venous ectasia (P = .019) and congestion (P < .001). Complication rates were higher in the PAS group, particularly for postoperative hemorrhage (P < .001) and ischemia-related complications (P < .001), which remained significant even after propensity score matching (P = .013 and P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that embolization of PAS before DAVF closure may significantly increase the risk of both intracranial hemorrhagic and ischemic complications. Therefore, routine embolization of PAS before DAVF closure is not supported by these results, particularly given the exceptionally low incidence of presumed hemorrhagic complications arising from an unobliterated \"pure\" pial supply before DAVF obliteration.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas With and Without Pial Artery Supply: Analysis of Treatment Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Su, Yongjie Ma, Zihao Song, Huiwei Liu, Chao Zhang, Huishen Pang, Yiguang Chen, Mingyue Huang, Jiaxing Yu, Liyong Sun, Guilin Li, Tao Hong, Ming Ye, Peng Hu, Peng Zhang, Hongqi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neu.0000000000003604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The prevalence of pial arterial supply (PAS) to intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) and its implications for the management of these fistulas have been limited to relatively small cohort studies and remain somewhat controversial. We conducted a retrospective study to characterize PAS in DAVFs and explore its implications for treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients evaluated over a 21-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Angiograms were examined to characterize the angioarchitecture of DAVFs and identify the presence of PAS. PAS was classified into 2 types: dilated preexisting dural branches and pure pial supply. Baseline characteristics, treatment approaches, and treatment and follow-up outcomes were compared between the DAVF cohorts with and without PAS. To minimize patient selection bias, the 2 cohorts were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cohort, 259 out of 1101 patients (23.5%) exhibited an additional PAS. Multivariate analysis identified 7 independent predictors of PAS: younger age (P < .001), longer disease duration (P = .021), multiple DAVFs (P < .001), tentorial DAVFs (P < .001), transverse-sigmoid sinus DAVFs (P < .001), and the presence of venous ectasia (P = .019) and congestion (P < .001). Complication rates were higher in the PAS group, particularly for postoperative hemorrhage (P < .001) and ischemia-related complications (P < .001), which remained significant even after propensity score matching (P = .013 and P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that embolization of PAS before DAVF closure may significantly increase the risk of both intracranial hemorrhagic and ischemic complications. Therefore, routine embolization of PAS before DAVF closure is not supported by these results, particularly given the exceptionally low incidence of presumed hemorrhagic complications arising from an unobliterated \\\"pure\\\" pial supply before DAVF obliteration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003604\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:颅硬膜动静脉瘘(davf)的颅内动脉供应(PAS)的流行及其对这些瘘管理的影响仅限于相对较小的队列研究,并且仍然存在一些争议。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定davf中PAS的特征,并探讨其对治疗的影响。方法:对连续21年评估的患者进行回顾性分析。检查血管造影以表征davf的血管结构并确定PAS的存在。PAS分为两种类型:先前存在的硬脑膜分支扩张和单纯的脑膜供应。基线特征、治疗方法、治疗和随访结果在有和没有PAS的DAVF队列之间进行比较。为了尽量减少患者选择偏差,使用倾向评分匹配将两个队列按1:1的比例进行匹配。结果:在该队列中,1101例患者中有259例(23.5%)表现出额外的PAS。多因素分析确定了7个独立的PAS预测因素:年龄较小(P < 0.001)、病程较长(P = 0.021)、多个davf (P < 0.001)、幕部davf (P < 0.001)、横贯乙状窦davf (P < 0.001)、静脉扩张(P = 0.019)和充血(P < 0.001)。PAS组的并发症发生率更高,特别是术后出血(P < 0.001)和缺血相关并发症(P < 0.001),即使在倾向评分匹配后(P = 0.013和P = 0.001),这一差异仍然显著。结论:在DAVF关闭前栓塞PAS可能会显著增加颅内出血和缺血性并发症的风险。因此,这些结果不支持在DAVF关闭前对PAS进行常规栓塞,特别是考虑到DAVF关闭前未闭塞的“纯”动脉供应所引起的出血并发症的发生率异常低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas With and Without Pial Artery Supply: Analysis of Treatment Outcomes.

Background and objectives: The prevalence of pial arterial supply (PAS) to intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) and its implications for the management of these fistulas have been limited to relatively small cohort studies and remain somewhat controversial. We conducted a retrospective study to characterize PAS in DAVFs and explore its implications for treatment.

Methods: Consecutive patients evaluated over a 21-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Angiograms were examined to characterize the angioarchitecture of DAVFs and identify the presence of PAS. PAS was classified into 2 types: dilated preexisting dural branches and pure pial supply. Baseline characteristics, treatment approaches, and treatment and follow-up outcomes were compared between the DAVF cohorts with and without PAS. To minimize patient selection bias, the 2 cohorts were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching.

Results: In this cohort, 259 out of 1101 patients (23.5%) exhibited an additional PAS. Multivariate analysis identified 7 independent predictors of PAS: younger age (P < .001), longer disease duration (P = .021), multiple DAVFs (P < .001), tentorial DAVFs (P < .001), transverse-sigmoid sinus DAVFs (P < .001), and the presence of venous ectasia (P = .019) and congestion (P < .001). Complication rates were higher in the PAS group, particularly for postoperative hemorrhage (P < .001) and ischemia-related complications (P < .001), which remained significant even after propensity score matching (P = .013 and P = .001).

Conclusion: The findings suggest that embolization of PAS before DAVF closure may significantly increase the risk of both intracranial hemorrhagic and ischemic complications. Therefore, routine embolization of PAS before DAVF closure is not supported by these results, particularly given the exceptionally low incidence of presumed hemorrhagic complications arising from an unobliterated "pure" pial supply before DAVF obliteration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信