内窥镜鼻内蝶窦手术中颈内动脉和蝶鞍的影像学检测。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Thara Tunthanathip, Thakul Oearsakul, Chin Taweesomboonyat, Nuttha Sanghan, Rakkrit Duangsoithong
{"title":"内窥镜鼻内蝶窦手术中颈内动脉和蝶鞍的影像学检测。","authors":"Thara Tunthanathip, Thakul Oearsakul, Chin Taweesomboonyat, Nuttha Sanghan, Rakkrit Duangsoithong","doi":"10.3171/2025.4.FOCUS24940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) is a minimally invasive procedure that accesses the sellar and parasellar regions. Various anatomical structures must be identified during the operation, particularly the sella turcica and internal carotid artery (ICA) bilaterally. In the present retrospective cohort study, authors aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model in detecting the sella turcica and ICA bilaterally in EETS video footage, with the goal of recognizing crucial landmarks and preventing potentially fatal injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors collected images from the endoscopic video footage of 98 patients who had undergone EETS from January 2015 to June 2024. The ICAs and sella turcica were labeled by neurosurgeons, and the entire dataset was divided into training, validation, and test datasets at a ratio of 7:2:1. The model for ICA and sella turcica detection was trained using the YOLOv5s object detection architecture, and precision, recall, mean average precision (mAP)@0.5, and mAP@0.5:0.95 were reported during the validation process. Moreover, the confusion matrix and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were assessed from the model using unseen images from the test dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DL model had precision, recall, mAP@0.5, and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 0.942, 0.955, 0.969, and 0.617, respectively, for all objects in the training processes with validation. For testing the model with unseen images, the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), whereas average precision was 0.99 (95% CI 0.99-1.00). For ICA detection with a multiclass approach, the AUCs were 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99) for the absence of any ICA, 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95) for 1 ICA in the images, and 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.96) for both ICAs in the image. Additionally, accuracy for the ICA and sella turcica was 0.958 and 0.965, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complex anatomical landmarks should be recognized during EETS. The computer vision model was effective in detecting the sella turcica and ICA bilaterally, as well as in identifying and avoiding fatal complications. For the model to generalize with reliability, it requires novel, unseen data from various settings to refine it and facilitate transfer learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"59 1","pages":"E11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image-based detection of the internal carotid arteries and sella turcica in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Thara Tunthanathip, Thakul Oearsakul, Chin Taweesomboonyat, Nuttha Sanghan, Rakkrit Duangsoithong\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.4.FOCUS24940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) is a minimally invasive procedure that accesses the sellar and parasellar regions. Various anatomical structures must be identified during the operation, particularly the sella turcica and internal carotid artery (ICA) bilaterally. In the present retrospective cohort study, authors aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model in detecting the sella turcica and ICA bilaterally in EETS video footage, with the goal of recognizing crucial landmarks and preventing potentially fatal injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors collected images from the endoscopic video footage of 98 patients who had undergone EETS from January 2015 to June 2024. The ICAs and sella turcica were labeled by neurosurgeons, and the entire dataset was divided into training, validation, and test datasets at a ratio of 7:2:1. The model for ICA and sella turcica detection was trained using the YOLOv5s object detection architecture, and precision, recall, mean average precision (mAP)@0.5, and mAP@0.5:0.95 were reported during the validation process. Moreover, the confusion matrix and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were assessed from the model using unseen images from the test dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DL model had precision, recall, mAP@0.5, and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 0.942, 0.955, 0.969, and 0.617, respectively, for all objects in the training processes with validation. For testing the model with unseen images, the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), whereas average precision was 0.99 (95% CI 0.99-1.00). For ICA detection with a multiclass approach, the AUCs were 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99) for the absence of any ICA, 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95) for 1 ICA in the images, and 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.96) for both ICAs in the image. Additionally, accuracy for the ICA and sella turcica was 0.958 and 0.965, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complex anatomical landmarks should be recognized during EETS. The computer vision model was effective in detecting the sella turcica and ICA bilaterally, as well as in identifying and avoiding fatal complications. For the model to generalize with reliability, it requires novel, unseen data from various settings to refine it and facilitate transfer learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"E11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.FOCUS24940\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.FOCUS24940","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:内镜鼻内经蝶窦手术(EETS)是一种进入鞍区和鞍旁区的微创手术。在手术中必须识别各种解剖结构,特别是蝶鞍和颈内动脉(ICA)。在本回顾性队列研究中,作者旨在评估深度学习(DL)模型在EETS视频片段中检测蝶鞍和ICA双侧的性能,目的是识别关键标志并预防潜在的致命伤害。方法:收集2015年1月至2024年6月行EETS的98例患者的内镜影像。ica和蝶鞍由神经外科医生进行标记,整个数据集按7:2:1的比例分为训练、验证和测试数据集。采用YOLOv5s目标检测架构对ICA和鞍区检测模型进行训练,验证过程中得到精度、召回率、平均精度(mAP)@0.5和mAP@0.5:0.95。此外,使用测试数据集中的未见图像从模型中评估混淆矩阵和接收器工作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)。结果:DL模型对训练过程中所有对象的准确率、召回率、mAP@0.5和mAP@0.5分别为0.942、0.955、0.969和0.617,分别为0.95。对于未见图像的模型测试,AUC为0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98),而平均精度为0.99 (95% CI 0.99-1.00)。对于用多类方法检测ICA,没有ICA的auc为0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99),图像中一个ICA的auc为0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95),图像中两个ICA的auc为0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.96)。ICA和蝶鞍的准确度分别为0.958和0.965。结论:eet术中应识别复杂的解剖标志。计算机视觉模型能有效地检测蝶鞍和双侧ICA,并能识别和避免致命并发症。为了使模型具有可靠的泛化,它需要来自各种设置的新颖的,未见过的数据来改进它并促进迁移学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Image-based detection of the internal carotid arteries and sella turcica in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery.

Objective: Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) is a minimally invasive procedure that accesses the sellar and parasellar regions. Various anatomical structures must be identified during the operation, particularly the sella turcica and internal carotid artery (ICA) bilaterally. In the present retrospective cohort study, authors aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model in detecting the sella turcica and ICA bilaterally in EETS video footage, with the goal of recognizing crucial landmarks and preventing potentially fatal injury.

Methods: The authors collected images from the endoscopic video footage of 98 patients who had undergone EETS from January 2015 to June 2024. The ICAs and sella turcica were labeled by neurosurgeons, and the entire dataset was divided into training, validation, and test datasets at a ratio of 7:2:1. The model for ICA and sella turcica detection was trained using the YOLOv5s object detection architecture, and precision, recall, mean average precision (mAP)@0.5, and mAP@0.5:0.95 were reported during the validation process. Moreover, the confusion matrix and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were assessed from the model using unseen images from the test dataset.

Results: The DL model had precision, recall, mAP@0.5, and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 0.942, 0.955, 0.969, and 0.617, respectively, for all objects in the training processes with validation. For testing the model with unseen images, the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), whereas average precision was 0.99 (95% CI 0.99-1.00). For ICA detection with a multiclass approach, the AUCs were 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99) for the absence of any ICA, 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95) for 1 ICA in the images, and 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.96) for both ICAs in the image. Additionally, accuracy for the ICA and sella turcica was 0.958 and 0.965, respectively.

Conclusions: Complex anatomical landmarks should be recognized during EETS. The computer vision model was effective in detecting the sella turcica and ICA bilaterally, as well as in identifying and avoiding fatal complications. For the model to generalize with reliability, it requires novel, unseen data from various settings to refine it and facilitate transfer learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信