全自动解剖地标定位和轨迹规划导航外脑室引流放置。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mathijs de Boer, Jesse A M van Doormaal, Mare H Köllen, Lambertus W Bartels, Pierre A J T Robe, Tristan P C van Doormaal
{"title":"全自动解剖地标定位和轨迹规划导航外脑室引流放置。","authors":"Mathijs de Boer, Jesse A M van Doormaal, Mare H Köllen, Lambertus W Bartels, Pierre A J T Robe, Tristan P C van Doormaal","doi":"10.3171/2025.4.FOCUS25163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and validate a fully automatic anatomical landmark localization and trajectory planning method for external ventricular drain (EVD) placement using CT or MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors used 125 preoperative CT and 137 contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI scans to generate 3D surface meshes of patients' skin and ventricular systems. Seven anatomical landmarks were manually annotated to train a neural network for automatic landmark localization. The model's accuracy was assessed by calculating the mean Euclidian distance of predicted landmarks to the ground truth. Kocher's point and EVD trajectories were automatically calculated with the foramen of Monro as the target. Performance was evaluated using Kakarla grades, as assessed by 3 clinicians. Interobserver agreement was measured with Pearson correlation, and scores were aggregated using majority voting. Ordinal linear regressions were used to assess whether modality or placement side had an effect on Kakarla grades. The impact of landmark localization error on the final EVD plan was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The automated landmark localization model achieved a mean error of 4.0 mm (SD 2.6 mm). Trajectory planning generated a trajectory for all patients, with a Kakarla grade of 1 in 92.9% of cases. Statistical analyses indicated a strong interobserver agreement and no significant differences between modalities (CT vs MRI) or EVD placement sides. The location of Kocher's point and the target point were significantly correlated to nasion landmark localization error, with median drifts of 9.38 mm (95% CI 1.94-19.16 mm) and 3.91 mm (95% CI 0.18-26.76 mm) for Kocher's point and the target point, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presented method was efficient and robust for landmark localization and accurate EVD trajectory planning. The short processing time thereby also provides a base for use in emergency settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"59 1","pages":"E14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fully automatic anatomical landmark localization and trajectory planning for navigated external ventricular drain placement.\",\"authors\":\"Mathijs de Boer, Jesse A M van Doormaal, Mare H Köllen, Lambertus W Bartels, Pierre A J T Robe, Tristan P C van Doormaal\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.4.FOCUS25163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and validate a fully automatic anatomical landmark localization and trajectory planning method for external ventricular drain (EVD) placement using CT or MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors used 125 preoperative CT and 137 contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI scans to generate 3D surface meshes of patients' skin and ventricular systems. Seven anatomical landmarks were manually annotated to train a neural network for automatic landmark localization. The model's accuracy was assessed by calculating the mean Euclidian distance of predicted landmarks to the ground truth. Kocher's point and EVD trajectories were automatically calculated with the foramen of Monro as the target. Performance was evaluated using Kakarla grades, as assessed by 3 clinicians. Interobserver agreement was measured with Pearson correlation, and scores were aggregated using majority voting. Ordinal linear regressions were used to assess whether modality or placement side had an effect on Kakarla grades. The impact of landmark localization error on the final EVD plan was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The automated landmark localization model achieved a mean error of 4.0 mm (SD 2.6 mm). Trajectory planning generated a trajectory for all patients, with a Kakarla grade of 1 in 92.9% of cases. Statistical analyses indicated a strong interobserver agreement and no significant differences between modalities (CT vs MRI) or EVD placement sides. The location of Kocher's point and the target point were significantly correlated to nasion landmark localization error, with median drifts of 9.38 mm (95% CI 1.94-19.16 mm) and 3.91 mm (95% CI 0.18-26.76 mm) for Kocher's point and the target point, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presented method was efficient and robust for landmark localization and accurate EVD trajectory planning. The short processing time thereby also provides a base for use in emergency settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"E14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.FOCUS25163\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.FOCUS25163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是开发和验证一种全自动解剖地标定位和轨迹规划方法,用于使用CT或MRI放置外脑室引流(EVD)。方法:术前125次CT扫描和137次t1加权MRI增强扫描生成患者皮肤和心室系统的三维表面网格。对7个解剖标记进行人工标注,训练神经网络进行自动标记定位。该模型的准确性是通过计算预测的地标到地面真实的平均欧几里德距离来评估的。以Monro孔为目标,自动计算Kocher点轨迹和EVD轨迹。由3名临床医生评估,采用Kakarla评分法评估患者的表现。观察者间的一致性用Pearson相关来衡量,分数用多数投票来汇总。使用有序线性回归来评估方式或放置侧是否对Kakarla评分有影响。并对地标定位误差对最终EVD计划的影响进行了评价。结果:自动地标定位模型平均误差为4.0 mm (SD为2.6 mm)。轨迹规划生成了所有患者的轨迹,92.9%的病例Kakarla评分为1级。统计分析表明,观察者之间的一致性很强,在CT与MRI或EVD放置侧之间没有显著差异。Kocher点和目标点的位置与国家地标定位误差显著相关,Kocher点和目标点的中位漂移分别为9.38 mm (95% CI 1.94 ~ 19.16 mm)和3.91 mm (95% CI 0.18 ~ 26.76 mm)。结论:该方法具有较强的鲁棒性,可用于标记定位和准确的EVD轨迹规划。因此,较短的处理时间也为在紧急情况下使用提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fully automatic anatomical landmark localization and trajectory planning for navigated external ventricular drain placement.

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a fully automatic anatomical landmark localization and trajectory planning method for external ventricular drain (EVD) placement using CT or MRI.

Methods: The authors used 125 preoperative CT and 137 contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI scans to generate 3D surface meshes of patients' skin and ventricular systems. Seven anatomical landmarks were manually annotated to train a neural network for automatic landmark localization. The model's accuracy was assessed by calculating the mean Euclidian distance of predicted landmarks to the ground truth. Kocher's point and EVD trajectories were automatically calculated with the foramen of Monro as the target. Performance was evaluated using Kakarla grades, as assessed by 3 clinicians. Interobserver agreement was measured with Pearson correlation, and scores were aggregated using majority voting. Ordinal linear regressions were used to assess whether modality or placement side had an effect on Kakarla grades. The impact of landmark localization error on the final EVD plan was also evaluated.

Results: The automated landmark localization model achieved a mean error of 4.0 mm (SD 2.6 mm). Trajectory planning generated a trajectory for all patients, with a Kakarla grade of 1 in 92.9% of cases. Statistical analyses indicated a strong interobserver agreement and no significant differences between modalities (CT vs MRI) or EVD placement sides. The location of Kocher's point and the target point were significantly correlated to nasion landmark localization error, with median drifts of 9.38 mm (95% CI 1.94-19.16 mm) and 3.91 mm (95% CI 0.18-26.76 mm) for Kocher's point and the target point, respectively.

Conclusions: The presented method was efficient and robust for landmark localization and accurate EVD trajectory planning. The short processing time thereby also provides a base for use in emergency settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信