评估未破裂颅内动脉瘤破裂风险预测的人工智能模型:关注血管几何和血流动力学见解。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muhammad Mohsin Khan, Noman Shah, Javed Iqbal, Nasser M F El-Ghandour, Miroslav Vukic, Michael Lawton, Jacques J Morcos, Bostjan Matos, Najia El-Abbadi, Amir Samii, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, Franco Servadei, Ahmed AlAzri, Kodeeswaran M, Aruni Velalakan, Bipin Chaurasia
{"title":"评估未破裂颅内动脉瘤破裂风险预测的人工智能模型:关注血管几何和血流动力学见解。","authors":"Muhammad Mohsin Khan, Noman Shah, Javed Iqbal, Nasser M F El-Ghandour, Miroslav Vukic, Michael Lawton, Jacques J Morcos, Bostjan Matos, Najia El-Abbadi, Amir Samii, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, Franco Servadei, Ahmed AlAzri, Kodeeswaran M, Aruni Velalakan, Bipin Chaurasia","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03689-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The estimation of rupture risk in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm (UIA) constitutes a major area of clinical interest due to the significant morbidity and mortality rates associated with aneurysm rupture. Classic clinical models based on factors such as size and location have demonstrated limited predictive accuracy, with small aneurysms being capable of rupture and larger ones remaining stable. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) now allow the development of more sophisticated models that integrate both geometric and hemodynamic variables, including wall shear stress (WSS) and blood flow dynamics. While previous studies have examined these factors separately, our review specifically focuses on how they are combined within AI-based predictive models for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). This integrated approach offers a more comprehensive and patient-specific risk assessment, going beyond traditional size-based methods. A wide array of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) using SVMs (Support Vector Machine) and CNNs (Convolutional Neural Network) has demonstrated much better predictive accuracy than those attained by classical methods. Minimum necessary hemodynamic parameters including WSS and oscillatory shear index (OSI) were identified as critical indicators of rupture. Moreover, the review emphasized how CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) merged with AI in simulating patient-specific hemodynamics, outstanding progress having been achieved in the realm of risk assessment. Currently, there are promising developments in AI models for clinical practice, but large and good-quality datasets, along with interpretation of model predictions, remain challenges. More research would further refine these models toward improvement, with increased utility in a clinical setup to better aim at patient-specific risk assessment and optimization of treatment strategies for UIAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating artificial intelligence models for rupture risk prediction in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a focus on vessel geometry and hemodynamic insights.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Mohsin Khan, Noman Shah, Javed Iqbal, Nasser M F El-Ghandour, Miroslav Vukic, Michael Lawton, Jacques J Morcos, Bostjan Matos, Najia El-Abbadi, Amir Samii, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, Franco Servadei, Ahmed AlAzri, Kodeeswaran M, Aruni Velalakan, Bipin Chaurasia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03689-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The estimation of rupture risk in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm (UIA) constitutes a major area of clinical interest due to the significant morbidity and mortality rates associated with aneurysm rupture. Classic clinical models based on factors such as size and location have demonstrated limited predictive accuracy, with small aneurysms being capable of rupture and larger ones remaining stable. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) now allow the development of more sophisticated models that integrate both geometric and hemodynamic variables, including wall shear stress (WSS) and blood flow dynamics. While previous studies have examined these factors separately, our review specifically focuses on how they are combined within AI-based predictive models for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). This integrated approach offers a more comprehensive and patient-specific risk assessment, going beyond traditional size-based methods. A wide array of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) using SVMs (Support Vector Machine) and CNNs (Convolutional Neural Network) has demonstrated much better predictive accuracy than those attained by classical methods. Minimum necessary hemodynamic parameters including WSS and oscillatory shear index (OSI) were identified as critical indicators of rupture. Moreover, the review emphasized how CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) merged with AI in simulating patient-specific hemodynamics, outstanding progress having been achieved in the realm of risk assessment. Currently, there are promising developments in AI models for clinical practice, but large and good-quality datasets, along with interpretation of model predictions, remain challenges. More research would further refine these models toward improvement, with increased utility in a clinical setup to better aim at patient-specific risk assessment and optimization of treatment strategies for UIAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03689-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03689-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIA)的破裂风险评估是一个重要的临床研究领域,因为动脉瘤破裂相关的发病率和死亡率很高。基于大小和位置等因素的经典临床模型已经证明了有限的预测准确性,小的动脉瘤能够破裂,而大的则保持稳定。人工智能(AI)的最新进展现在允许开发更复杂的模型,这些模型集成了几何和血流动力学变量,包括壁面剪切应力(WSS)和血流动力学。虽然之前的研究分别检查了这些因素,但我们的综述特别关注如何将它们结合在基于人工智能的未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIAs)预测模型中。这种综合方法超越了传统的基于尺寸的方法,提供了更全面和针对患者的风险评估。广泛的机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)使用支持向量机(svm)和卷积神经网络(cnn)已经证明比经典方法获得更好的预测精度。最小必要的血流动力学参数包括WSS和振荡剪切指数(OSI)被确定为破裂的关键指标。此外,该综述还强调了CFD(计算流体动力学)如何与AI相结合来模拟患者特异性血流动力学,在风险评估领域取得了突出进展。目前,人工智能模型在临床实践中有了很好的发展,但大规模和高质量的数据集,以及对模型预测的解释,仍然是挑战。更多的研究将进一步完善这些模型,使其在临床设置中更加实用,以更好地针对患者特定的风险评估和优化uia的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating artificial intelligence models for rupture risk prediction in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a focus on vessel geometry and hemodynamic insights.

The estimation of rupture risk in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm (UIA) constitutes a major area of clinical interest due to the significant morbidity and mortality rates associated with aneurysm rupture. Classic clinical models based on factors such as size and location have demonstrated limited predictive accuracy, with small aneurysms being capable of rupture and larger ones remaining stable. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) now allow the development of more sophisticated models that integrate both geometric and hemodynamic variables, including wall shear stress (WSS) and blood flow dynamics. While previous studies have examined these factors separately, our review specifically focuses on how they are combined within AI-based predictive models for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). This integrated approach offers a more comprehensive and patient-specific risk assessment, going beyond traditional size-based methods. A wide array of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) using SVMs (Support Vector Machine) and CNNs (Convolutional Neural Network) has demonstrated much better predictive accuracy than those attained by classical methods. Minimum necessary hemodynamic parameters including WSS and oscillatory shear index (OSI) were identified as critical indicators of rupture. Moreover, the review emphasized how CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) merged with AI in simulating patient-specific hemodynamics, outstanding progress having been achieved in the realm of risk assessment. Currently, there are promising developments in AI models for clinical practice, but large and good-quality datasets, along with interpretation of model predictions, remain challenges. More research would further refine these models toward improvement, with increased utility in a clinical setup to better aim at patient-specific risk assessment and optimization of treatment strategies for UIAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信