{"title":"机器学习方法预测75岁及以上患者腰椎融合术后住院时间延长:一项基于综合老年评估的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Qijun Wang, Shuaikang Wang, Peng Wang, Shibao Lu","doi":"10.3171/2025.4.FOCUS24614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postoperative recovery following lumbar fusion surgery in patients aged 75 years and older often requires a prolonged length of stay (PLOS) in the hospital. Accurately predicting the risk of PLOS and assessing its risk factors for preoperative optimization are crucial to guide clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to select the risk factors for PLOS and develop a machine learning (ML) model to estimate the likelihood of PLOS based on comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) domains in older patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cohort of 242 patients aged ≥ 75 years (median age 80 years) undergoing lumbar fusion surgery at a single center from March 2019 to December 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. Predictor variables consisted of clinical characteristics, CGA variables, and intraoperative variables. The primary outcome was PLOS, defined as a hospital LOS above the 75th percentile in the overall study population. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (7:3) for model training and validation. Ensemble ML algorithms were used to select the significant variables associated with PLOS, and 9 ML models were used to develop predictive models. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method was used for model interpretation and feature importance ranking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three ensemble ML algorithms selected 9 CGA and clinical variables as influential factors of PLOS. The random forest (RF) model had the best predictive performance among the models evaluated, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.822 (95% CI 0.727-0.917) and F1-score of 0.571. SHAP values indicated that the duration of surgery, the number of fusion levels, and age were the most important predictors, while the Fried frailty phenotype was the most important CGA variable for PLOS. The RF model and its SHAP interpretations were deployed online for clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This ML model could facilitate individual risk prediction and risk factor identification for PLOS in older patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery, with the potential to improve preoperative optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"59 1","pages":"E16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning approaches for predicting prolonged hospital length of stay after lumbar fusion surgery in patients aged 75 years and older: a retrospective cohort study based on comprehensive geriatric assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Qijun Wang, Shuaikang Wang, Peng Wang, Shibao Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.4.FOCUS24614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postoperative recovery following lumbar fusion surgery in patients aged 75 years and older often requires a prolonged length of stay (PLOS) in the hospital. Accurately predicting the risk of PLOS and assessing its risk factors for preoperative optimization are crucial to guide clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to select the risk factors for PLOS and develop a machine learning (ML) model to estimate the likelihood of PLOS based on comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) domains in older patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cohort of 242 patients aged ≥ 75 years (median age 80 years) undergoing lumbar fusion surgery at a single center from March 2019 to December 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. Predictor variables consisted of clinical characteristics, CGA variables, and intraoperative variables. The primary outcome was PLOS, defined as a hospital LOS above the 75th percentile in the overall study population. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (7:3) for model training and validation. Ensemble ML algorithms were used to select the significant variables associated with PLOS, and 9 ML models were used to develop predictive models. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method was used for model interpretation and feature importance ranking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three ensemble ML algorithms selected 9 CGA and clinical variables as influential factors of PLOS. The random forest (RF) model had the best predictive performance among the models evaluated, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.822 (95% CI 0.727-0.917) and F1-score of 0.571. SHAP values indicated that the duration of surgery, the number of fusion levels, and age were the most important predictors, while the Fried frailty phenotype was the most important CGA variable for PLOS. The RF model and its SHAP interpretations were deployed online for clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This ML model could facilitate individual risk prediction and risk factor identification for PLOS in older patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery, with the potential to improve preoperative optimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"E16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.FOCUS24614\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.FOCUS24614","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:75岁及以上患者腰椎融合术后恢复通常需要延长住院时间(PLOS)。准确预测PLOS的风险,评估其术前优化的危险因素对指导临床决策至关重要。本研究的目的是选择PLOS的危险因素,并开发机器学习(ML)模型,以估计基于综合老年评估(CGA)域的老年腰椎融合手术患者PLOS的可能性。方法:回顾性分析2019年3月至2021年12月在单中心接受腰椎融合手术的242例年龄≥75岁(中位年龄80岁)患者的观察性队列。预测变量包括临床特征、CGA变量和术中变量。主要终点是PLOS,定义为医院LOS在整个研究人群中高于第75百分位。将患者随机分为两组(7:3)进行模型训练和验证。使用集成ML算法选择与PLOS相关的显著变量,并使用9 ML模型建立预测模型。采用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)方法进行模型解释和特征重要性排序。结果:三种集成ML算法选择了9个CGA和临床变量作为影响PLOS的因素。随机森林(RF)模型预测效果最好,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.822 (95% CI 0.727 ~ 0.917), f1评分为0.571。SHAP值表明,手术时间、融合水平数量和年龄是最重要的预测因素,而Fried脆性表型是PLOS最重要的CGA变量。RF模型及其SHAP解释在线部署用于临床应用。结论:该ML模型有助于老年腰椎融合术患者PLOS的个体风险预测和危险因素识别,具有改善术前优化的潜力。
Machine learning approaches for predicting prolonged hospital length of stay after lumbar fusion surgery in patients aged 75 years and older: a retrospective cohort study based on comprehensive geriatric assessment.
Objective: Postoperative recovery following lumbar fusion surgery in patients aged 75 years and older often requires a prolonged length of stay (PLOS) in the hospital. Accurately predicting the risk of PLOS and assessing its risk factors for preoperative optimization are crucial to guide clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to select the risk factors for PLOS and develop a machine learning (ML) model to estimate the likelihood of PLOS based on comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) domains in older patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.
Methods: An observational cohort of 242 patients aged ≥ 75 years (median age 80 years) undergoing lumbar fusion surgery at a single center from March 2019 to December 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. Predictor variables consisted of clinical characteristics, CGA variables, and intraoperative variables. The primary outcome was PLOS, defined as a hospital LOS above the 75th percentile in the overall study population. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (7:3) for model training and validation. Ensemble ML algorithms were used to select the significant variables associated with PLOS, and 9 ML models were used to develop predictive models. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method was used for model interpretation and feature importance ranking.
Results: Three ensemble ML algorithms selected 9 CGA and clinical variables as influential factors of PLOS. The random forest (RF) model had the best predictive performance among the models evaluated, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.822 (95% CI 0.727-0.917) and F1-score of 0.571. SHAP values indicated that the duration of surgery, the number of fusion levels, and age were the most important predictors, while the Fried frailty phenotype was the most important CGA variable for PLOS. The RF model and its SHAP interpretations were deployed online for clinical utility.
Conclusions: This ML model could facilitate individual risk prediction and risk factor identification for PLOS in older patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery, with the potential to improve preoperative optimization.