Junchen Chen, Shunqiu Huang, Yashi Chen, Cheng Luo, Yong Li
{"title":"评估曲坦类药物在儿童偏头痛治疗中的安全性:一项综合药物警戒分析。","authors":"Junchen Chen, Shunqiu Huang, Yashi Chen, Cheng Luo, Yong Li","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S524809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Triptans are the only FDA-approved migraine-specific treatment for pediatric patients, yet comprehensive real-world safety data remains limited, particularly regarding rare adverse events and age-specific safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2004-2024, focusing on adverse events associated with sumatriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and almotriptan in patients aged 6-18 years. After systematic deduplication following FDA guidelines, disproportionality analysis was performed using reporting odds ratios (ROR) and risk-signal detection ratios (RSDR). Subgroup analyses compared safety signals between children (6-11 years) and adolescents (12-18 years) at both Preferred Terms and System Organ Class levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 19,557 triptan-related cases in FAERS, 375 (1.9%) were pediatric cases, predominantly female (70.7%) and aged 12-18 years (91.2%). Sumatriptan was most frequently reported (77.3%), followed by rizatriptan (17.9%). Significant safety signals included posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with sumatriptan (ROR=86.69, 95% CI=26.6-282.54), acute respiratory failure with rizatriptan (ROR=98.12, 95% CI=40.17-239.64), and renal infarction with zolmitriptan (ROR=2231.93, 95% CI=667.65-7461.24). Age-stratified analysis revealed distinct profiles: younger children (6-11 years) showed higher risks for gastric emptying impairment (ROR=331.24) and throat tightness (ROR=77.14), while adolescents (12-18 years) experienced more diverse adverse events, notably pharyngeal swelling (ROR=133.81) and chest discomfort (ROR=19.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Real-world triptan safety profiles reveal age-specific risks in pediatric populations, emphasizing the need for tailored monitoring strategies and age-appropriate safety protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"3185-3205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12212090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Triptan Safety in Pediatric Migraine Management: A Comprehensive Pharmacovigilance Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Junchen Chen, Shunqiu Huang, Yashi Chen, Cheng Luo, Yong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S524809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Triptans are the only FDA-approved migraine-specific treatment for pediatric patients, yet comprehensive real-world safety data remains limited, particularly regarding rare adverse events and age-specific safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2004-2024, focusing on adverse events associated with sumatriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and almotriptan in patients aged 6-18 years. After systematic deduplication following FDA guidelines, disproportionality analysis was performed using reporting odds ratios (ROR) and risk-signal detection ratios (RSDR). Subgroup analyses compared safety signals between children (6-11 years) and adolescents (12-18 years) at both Preferred Terms and System Organ Class levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 19,557 triptan-related cases in FAERS, 375 (1.9%) were pediatric cases, predominantly female (70.7%) and aged 12-18 years (91.2%). Sumatriptan was most frequently reported (77.3%), followed by rizatriptan (17.9%). Significant safety signals included posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with sumatriptan (ROR=86.69, 95% CI=26.6-282.54), acute respiratory failure with rizatriptan (ROR=98.12, 95% CI=40.17-239.64), and renal infarction with zolmitriptan (ROR=2231.93, 95% CI=667.65-7461.24). Age-stratified analysis revealed distinct profiles: younger children (6-11 years) showed higher risks for gastric emptying impairment (ROR=331.24) and throat tightness (ROR=77.14), while adolescents (12-18 years) experienced more diverse adverse events, notably pharyngeal swelling (ROR=133.81) and chest discomfort (ROR=19.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Real-world triptan safety profiles reveal age-specific risks in pediatric populations, emphasizing the need for tailored monitoring strategies and age-appropriate safety protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3185-3205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12212090/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S524809\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S524809","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating Triptan Safety in Pediatric Migraine Management: A Comprehensive Pharmacovigilance Analysis.
Introduction: Triptans are the only FDA-approved migraine-specific treatment for pediatric patients, yet comprehensive real-world safety data remains limited, particularly regarding rare adverse events and age-specific safety profiles.
Methods and materials: We conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2004-2024, focusing on adverse events associated with sumatriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and almotriptan in patients aged 6-18 years. After systematic deduplication following FDA guidelines, disproportionality analysis was performed using reporting odds ratios (ROR) and risk-signal detection ratios (RSDR). Subgroup analyses compared safety signals between children (6-11 years) and adolescents (12-18 years) at both Preferred Terms and System Organ Class levels.
Results: Among 19,557 triptan-related cases in FAERS, 375 (1.9%) were pediatric cases, predominantly female (70.7%) and aged 12-18 years (91.2%). Sumatriptan was most frequently reported (77.3%), followed by rizatriptan (17.9%). Significant safety signals included posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with sumatriptan (ROR=86.69, 95% CI=26.6-282.54), acute respiratory failure with rizatriptan (ROR=98.12, 95% CI=40.17-239.64), and renal infarction with zolmitriptan (ROR=2231.93, 95% CI=667.65-7461.24). Age-stratified analysis revealed distinct profiles: younger children (6-11 years) showed higher risks for gastric emptying impairment (ROR=331.24) and throat tightness (ROR=77.14), while adolescents (12-18 years) experienced more diverse adverse events, notably pharyngeal swelling (ROR=133.81) and chest discomfort (ROR=19.05).
Conclusion: Real-world triptan safety profiles reveal age-specific risks in pediatric populations, emphasizing the need for tailored monitoring strategies and age-appropriate safety protocols.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.