{"title":"碳酸氢钠锁固液对血液透析患者导管相关血流感染的影响:三种锁固的比较效果。","authors":"Tamar Kasradze, Tamar Didbaridze, Irma Tchokhonelidze","doi":"10.1007/s40620-025-02315-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary challenge for hemodialysis (HD) patients using permanent tunneled cuffed catheters is to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections. This study assessed the effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections and compared its efficacy to antibiotic-containing locks.</p><p><strong>Design, materials, and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective single-center, open-label, cohort study over 30 months with the aim to compare three cohorts: cohort I employed 8.4% sodium bicarbonate solution lock, cohort II employed 0.5 mg/ml gentamicin/acid citrate dextrose solution lock, and cohort III employed unfractionated conventional heparin 5000 U/ml solution lock. The primary endpoint was the first episode of catheter-related bloodstream infection, while the secondary endpoint was catheter loss due to catheter-related bloodstream infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study involved 204 HD patients with permanent tunneled cuffed central venous catheters (CVCs). A total of 58 cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection were documented. In the sodium bicarbonate-lock cohort, infection occurred in 17.24%, in the gentamicin/acid citrate-lock cohort in 36.21%, and in the heparin-lock cohort in 46.55%. Patients with sodium bicarbonate and gentamicin/acid citrate locks exhibited a statistically significant lower risk of developing infections (0.4/1000 catheter days and 0.7/1000 catheter days, respectively) compared to patients with heparin-lock (1.4/1000 catheter days). Patients with heparin lock faced a higher risk of losing a catheter due to infection compared to those with gentamicin/acid citrate lock and sodium bicarbonate-lock (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.26, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [1.09-1.46], P = 0.001) and (HR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.01-1.19], P = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sodium bicarbonate locking solution demonstrated an infection-free catheter survival comparable to that of the gentamicin citrate solution and significantly decreased catheter-related bloodstream infection compared to heparin locks.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of sodium bicarbonate locking solution on catheter-related blood stream infection in hemodialysis patients: comparative effectiveness of three locks.\",\"authors\":\"Tamar Kasradze, Tamar Didbaridze, Irma Tchokhonelidze\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40620-025-02315-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary challenge for hemodialysis (HD) patients using permanent tunneled cuffed catheters is to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections. This study assessed the effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections and compared its efficacy to antibiotic-containing locks.</p><p><strong>Design, materials, and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective single-center, open-label, cohort study over 30 months with the aim to compare three cohorts: cohort I employed 8.4% sodium bicarbonate solution lock, cohort II employed 0.5 mg/ml gentamicin/acid citrate dextrose solution lock, and cohort III employed unfractionated conventional heparin 5000 U/ml solution lock. The primary endpoint was the first episode of catheter-related bloodstream infection, while the secondary endpoint was catheter loss due to catheter-related bloodstream infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study involved 204 HD patients with permanent tunneled cuffed central venous catheters (CVCs). A total of 58 cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection were documented. In the sodium bicarbonate-lock cohort, infection occurred in 17.24%, in the gentamicin/acid citrate-lock cohort in 36.21%, and in the heparin-lock cohort in 46.55%. Patients with sodium bicarbonate and gentamicin/acid citrate locks exhibited a statistically significant lower risk of developing infections (0.4/1000 catheter days and 0.7/1000 catheter days, respectively) compared to patients with heparin-lock (1.4/1000 catheter days). Patients with heparin lock faced a higher risk of losing a catheter due to infection compared to those with gentamicin/acid citrate lock and sodium bicarbonate-lock (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.26, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [1.09-1.46], P = 0.001) and (HR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.01-1.19], P = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sodium bicarbonate locking solution demonstrated an infection-free catheter survival comparable to that of the gentamicin citrate solution and significantly decreased catheter-related bloodstream infection compared to heparin locks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02315-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02315-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:血液透析(HD)患者使用永久性隧道套管导管的主要挑战是预防导管相关血流感染。本研究评估了碳酸氢钠预防导管相关血流感染的有效性,并将其与含抗生素锁的有效性进行了比较。设计、材料和方法:我们进行了一项为期30个月的前瞻性单中心、开放标签、队列研究,目的是比较三个队列:队列I采用8.4%碳酸氢钠溶液锁,队列II采用0.5 mg/ml庆大霉素/柠檬酸葡萄糖溶液锁,队列III采用未分离的常规肝素5000 U/ml溶液锁。主要终点是导管相关血流感染的首次发作,次要终点是导管相关血流感染导致的导管丢失。结果:本研究纳入了204例使用永久性隧道套管中心静脉导管(CVCs)的HD患者。共记录了58例导管相关血流感染。在碳酸氢钠锁组中,感染发生率为17.24%,庆大霉素/柠檬酸锁组为36.21%,肝素锁组为46.55%。与肝素锁药组(1.4/1000导管天)相比,碳酸氢钠和庆大霉素/柠檬酸锁药组患者发生感染的风险(分别为0.4/1000导管天和0.7/1000导管天)具有统计学意义。与庆大霉素/柠檬酸锁管和碳酸氢钠锁管患者相比,肝素锁管患者因感染丢失导管的风险更高(风险比(HR) = 1.26, 95%可信区间(CI) [1.09-1.46], P = 0.001)和(HR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.01-1.19], P = 0.024)。结论:碳酸氢钠锁栓溶液与柠檬酸庆大霉素溶液相比具有无感染的导管生存期,与肝素锁栓相比可显著降低导管相关血流感染。
Impact of sodium bicarbonate locking solution on catheter-related blood stream infection in hemodialysis patients: comparative effectiveness of three locks.
Background: The primary challenge for hemodialysis (HD) patients using permanent tunneled cuffed catheters is to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections. This study assessed the effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections and compared its efficacy to antibiotic-containing locks.
Design, materials, and methods: We conducted a prospective single-center, open-label, cohort study over 30 months with the aim to compare three cohorts: cohort I employed 8.4% sodium bicarbonate solution lock, cohort II employed 0.5 mg/ml gentamicin/acid citrate dextrose solution lock, and cohort III employed unfractionated conventional heparin 5000 U/ml solution lock. The primary endpoint was the first episode of catheter-related bloodstream infection, while the secondary endpoint was catheter loss due to catheter-related bloodstream infection.
Results: This study involved 204 HD patients with permanent tunneled cuffed central venous catheters (CVCs). A total of 58 cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection were documented. In the sodium bicarbonate-lock cohort, infection occurred in 17.24%, in the gentamicin/acid citrate-lock cohort in 36.21%, and in the heparin-lock cohort in 46.55%. Patients with sodium bicarbonate and gentamicin/acid citrate locks exhibited a statistically significant lower risk of developing infections (0.4/1000 catheter days and 0.7/1000 catheter days, respectively) compared to patients with heparin-lock (1.4/1000 catheter days). Patients with heparin lock faced a higher risk of losing a catheter due to infection compared to those with gentamicin/acid citrate lock and sodium bicarbonate-lock (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.26, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [1.09-1.46], P = 0.001) and (HR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.01-1.19], P = 0.024).
Conclusion: The sodium bicarbonate locking solution demonstrated an infection-free catheter survival comparable to that of the gentamicin citrate solution and significantly decreased catheter-related bloodstream infection compared to heparin locks.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).