PET/CT影像中FDG外渗:基于临床观察的视觉分级方法。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Seçkin Bilgiç
{"title":"PET/CT影像中FDG外渗:基于临床观察的视觉分级方法。","authors":"Seçkin Bilgiç","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to introduce a practical, visually based grading system for FDG extravasation in PET/CT imaging and to investigate its impact on semi-quantitative SUV measurements in reference regions. The objective is not only to quantify the effect but also to provide a framework for guiding clinical interpretation and reporting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 235 oncologic PET/CT scans were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorised into four groups based on extravasation severity: Grade 0 (no extravasation), Grade 1 (minimal), Grade 2 (moderate), and Grade 3 (severe). A visual grading system was developed and applied to classify image quality degradation. Mean SUVmax and SUVmean values were recorded from liver and mediastinal blood pool regions. Statistical comparisons were conducted using ANOVA and post hoc testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FDG extravasation was observed in 75 patients (31.9%). Among the 75 patients with extravasation, 43 were Grade 1 and 26 were Grade 2. Statistically significant increases were found in both liver and mediastinal SUV values in patients with Grade 1 and 2 extravasation compared to Grade 0 (p < 0.001 for all). For example, Liver SUVmax increased from 3.13 ± 0.44 (Grade 0) to 3.58 ± 0.50 (Grade 1), and MedSUVmean increased from 1.80 ± 0.31 (Grade 0) to 2.17 ± 0.40 (Grade 2), representing up to a 20.6% difference. Grade 3 cases did not show consistent trends.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-to-moderate FDG extravasation can significantly alter reference SUV values. Incorporating extravasation grading into clinical reporting or normalising reference SUV values may enhance diagnostic consistency and minimise the need for repeat imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDG Extravasation in PET/CT Imaging: A Visual Grading Approach Based on Clinical Observations.\",\"authors\":\"Seçkin Bilgiç\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to introduce a practical, visually based grading system for FDG extravasation in PET/CT imaging and to investigate its impact on semi-quantitative SUV measurements in reference regions. The objective is not only to quantify the effect but also to provide a framework for guiding clinical interpretation and reporting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 235 oncologic PET/CT scans were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorised into four groups based on extravasation severity: Grade 0 (no extravasation), Grade 1 (minimal), Grade 2 (moderate), and Grade 3 (severe). A visual grading system was developed and applied to classify image quality degradation. Mean SUVmax and SUVmean values were recorded from liver and mediastinal blood pool regions. Statistical comparisons were conducted using ANOVA and post hoc testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FDG extravasation was observed in 75 patients (31.9%). Among the 75 patients with extravasation, 43 were Grade 1 and 26 were Grade 2. Statistically significant increases were found in both liver and mediastinal SUV values in patients with Grade 1 and 2 extravasation compared to Grade 0 (p < 0.001 for all). For example, Liver SUVmax increased from 3.13 ± 0.44 (Grade 0) to 3.58 ± 0.50 (Grade 1), and MedSUVmean increased from 1.80 ± 0.31 (Grade 0) to 2.17 ± 0.40 (Grade 2), representing up to a 20.6% difference. Grade 3 cases did not show consistent trends.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-to-moderate FDG extravasation can significantly alter reference SUV values. Incorporating extravasation grading into clinical reporting or normalising reference SUV values may enhance diagnostic consistency and minimise the need for repeat imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13876\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13876","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在介绍一种实用的、基于视觉的PET/CT成像FDG外渗分级系统,并探讨其对参考区域半定量SUV测量的影响。目的不仅是量化效果,而且为指导临床解释和报告提供一个框架。方法:回顾性分析235例肿瘤PET/CT扫描。根据外渗严重程度将患者分为4组:0级(无外渗)、1级(轻微)、2级(中度)和3级(严重)。开发了一种视觉分级系统,并将其应用于图像质量退化的分类。记录肝脏和纵隔血池区域的平均SUVmax和suv平均值。统计学比较采用方差分析和事后检验。结果:FDG外渗75例(31.9%)。75例外渗患者中43例为1级,26例为2级。与0级患者相比,1级和2级外渗患者肝脏和纵隔SUV值均有统计学意义的升高(p)。结论:低至中度FDG外渗可显著改变参考SUV值。将外渗分级纳入临床报告或规范参考SUV值可以提高诊断的一致性并减少重复成像的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FDG Extravasation in PET/CT Imaging: A Visual Grading Approach Based on Clinical Observations.

Purpose: This study aims to introduce a practical, visually based grading system for FDG extravasation in PET/CT imaging and to investigate its impact on semi-quantitative SUV measurements in reference regions. The objective is not only to quantify the effect but also to provide a framework for guiding clinical interpretation and reporting.

Methods: A total of 235 oncologic PET/CT scans were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorised into four groups based on extravasation severity: Grade 0 (no extravasation), Grade 1 (minimal), Grade 2 (moderate), and Grade 3 (severe). A visual grading system was developed and applied to classify image quality degradation. Mean SUVmax and SUVmean values were recorded from liver and mediastinal blood pool regions. Statistical comparisons were conducted using ANOVA and post hoc testing.

Results: FDG extravasation was observed in 75 patients (31.9%). Among the 75 patients with extravasation, 43 were Grade 1 and 26 were Grade 2. Statistically significant increases were found in both liver and mediastinal SUV values in patients with Grade 1 and 2 extravasation compared to Grade 0 (p < 0.001 for all). For example, Liver SUVmax increased from 3.13 ± 0.44 (Grade 0) to 3.58 ± 0.50 (Grade 1), and MedSUVmean increased from 1.80 ± 0.31 (Grade 0) to 2.17 ± 0.40 (Grade 2), representing up to a 20.6% difference. Grade 3 cases did not show consistent trends.

Conclusion: Low-to-moderate FDG extravasation can significantly alter reference SUV values. Incorporating extravasation grading into clinical reporting or normalising reference SUV values may enhance diagnostic consistency and minimise the need for repeat imaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信