{"title":"PET/CT影像中FDG外渗:基于临床观察的视觉分级方法。","authors":"Seçkin Bilgiç","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to introduce a practical, visually based grading system for FDG extravasation in PET/CT imaging and to investigate its impact on semi-quantitative SUV measurements in reference regions. The objective is not only to quantify the effect but also to provide a framework for guiding clinical interpretation and reporting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 235 oncologic PET/CT scans were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorised into four groups based on extravasation severity: Grade 0 (no extravasation), Grade 1 (minimal), Grade 2 (moderate), and Grade 3 (severe). A visual grading system was developed and applied to classify image quality degradation. Mean SUVmax and SUVmean values were recorded from liver and mediastinal blood pool regions. Statistical comparisons were conducted using ANOVA and post hoc testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FDG extravasation was observed in 75 patients (31.9%). Among the 75 patients with extravasation, 43 were Grade 1 and 26 were Grade 2. Statistically significant increases were found in both liver and mediastinal SUV values in patients with Grade 1 and 2 extravasation compared to Grade 0 (p < 0.001 for all). For example, Liver SUVmax increased from 3.13 ± 0.44 (Grade 0) to 3.58 ± 0.50 (Grade 1), and MedSUVmean increased from 1.80 ± 0.31 (Grade 0) to 2.17 ± 0.40 (Grade 2), representing up to a 20.6% difference. Grade 3 cases did not show consistent trends.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-to-moderate FDG extravasation can significantly alter reference SUV values. Incorporating extravasation grading into clinical reporting or normalising reference SUV values may enhance diagnostic consistency and minimise the need for repeat imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDG Extravasation in PET/CT Imaging: A Visual Grading Approach Based on Clinical Observations.\",\"authors\":\"Seçkin Bilgiç\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to introduce a practical, visually based grading system for FDG extravasation in PET/CT imaging and to investigate its impact on semi-quantitative SUV measurements in reference regions. The objective is not only to quantify the effect but also to provide a framework for guiding clinical interpretation and reporting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 235 oncologic PET/CT scans were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorised into four groups based on extravasation severity: Grade 0 (no extravasation), Grade 1 (minimal), Grade 2 (moderate), and Grade 3 (severe). A visual grading system was developed and applied to classify image quality degradation. Mean SUVmax and SUVmean values were recorded from liver and mediastinal blood pool regions. Statistical comparisons were conducted using ANOVA and post hoc testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FDG extravasation was observed in 75 patients (31.9%). Among the 75 patients with extravasation, 43 were Grade 1 and 26 were Grade 2. Statistically significant increases were found in both liver and mediastinal SUV values in patients with Grade 1 and 2 extravasation compared to Grade 0 (p < 0.001 for all). For example, Liver SUVmax increased from 3.13 ± 0.44 (Grade 0) to 3.58 ± 0.50 (Grade 1), and MedSUVmean increased from 1.80 ± 0.31 (Grade 0) to 2.17 ± 0.40 (Grade 2), representing up to a 20.6% difference. Grade 3 cases did not show consistent trends.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-to-moderate FDG extravasation can significantly alter reference SUV values. Incorporating extravasation grading into clinical reporting or normalising reference SUV values may enhance diagnostic consistency and minimise the need for repeat imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13876\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13876","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
FDG Extravasation in PET/CT Imaging: A Visual Grading Approach Based on Clinical Observations.
Purpose: This study aims to introduce a practical, visually based grading system for FDG extravasation in PET/CT imaging and to investigate its impact on semi-quantitative SUV measurements in reference regions. The objective is not only to quantify the effect but also to provide a framework for guiding clinical interpretation and reporting.
Methods: A total of 235 oncologic PET/CT scans were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorised into four groups based on extravasation severity: Grade 0 (no extravasation), Grade 1 (minimal), Grade 2 (moderate), and Grade 3 (severe). A visual grading system was developed and applied to classify image quality degradation. Mean SUVmax and SUVmean values were recorded from liver and mediastinal blood pool regions. Statistical comparisons were conducted using ANOVA and post hoc testing.
Results: FDG extravasation was observed in 75 patients (31.9%). Among the 75 patients with extravasation, 43 were Grade 1 and 26 were Grade 2. Statistically significant increases were found in both liver and mediastinal SUV values in patients with Grade 1 and 2 extravasation compared to Grade 0 (p < 0.001 for all). For example, Liver SUVmax increased from 3.13 ± 0.44 (Grade 0) to 3.58 ± 0.50 (Grade 1), and MedSUVmean increased from 1.80 ± 0.31 (Grade 0) to 2.17 ± 0.40 (Grade 2), representing up to a 20.6% difference. Grade 3 cases did not show consistent trends.
Conclusion: Low-to-moderate FDG extravasation can significantly alter reference SUV values. Incorporating extravasation grading into clinical reporting or normalising reference SUV values may enhance diagnostic consistency and minimise the need for repeat imaging.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.