使用数字卫生技术的分散临床试验的参与者经验:ACTIV-6研究

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.69
Carrie Reale, Janelle Faiman, Russ Beebe, Jessica S Marlin, Sean Collins, David R Boulware, Sarah E Dunsmore, Florence Thicklin, Thomas G Stewart, Adrian F Hernandez, Russell L Rothman, Christopher J Lindsell, Shilo Anders
{"title":"使用数字卫生技术的分散临床试验的参与者经验:ACTIV-6研究","authors":"Carrie Reale, Janelle Faiman, Russ Beebe, Jessica S Marlin, Sean Collins, David R Boulware, Sarah E Dunsmore, Florence Thicklin, Thomas G Stewart, Adrian F Hernandez, Russell L Rothman, Christopher J Lindsell, Shilo Anders","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate recruitment and retention impede clinical trial goals. Emerging decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) leveraging digital health technologies (DHTs) for remote recruitment and data collection aim to address barriers to participation in traditional trials. The ACTIV-6 trial is a DCT using DHTs, but participants' experiences of such trials remain largely unknown. This study explored participants' perspectives of the ACTIV-6 DCT that tested outpatient COVID-19 therapeutics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in the ACTIV-6 study were recruited via email to share their day-to-day trial experiences during 1-hour virtual focus groups. Two human factors researchers guided group discussions through a semi-structured script that probed expectations and perceptions of study activities. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using a grounded theory approach with open coding to identify key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight ACTIV-6 study participants aged 30+ years completed a virtual focus group including 1-4 participants each. Analysis yielded three major themes: perceptions of the DCT experience, study activity engagement, and trust. Participants perceived the use of remote DCT procedures supported by DHTs as an acceptable and efficient method of organizing and tracking study activities, communicating with study personnel, and managing study medications at home. Use of social media was effective in supporting geographically dispersed participant recruitment but also raised issues with trust and study legitimacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While participants in this qualitative study viewed the DCT-with-DHT approach as reasonably efficient and engaging, they also identified challenges to address. Understanding facilitators and barriers to DCT participation and DHT interaction can help improve future research design.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participant experiences in a decentralized clinical trial using digital health technologies: The ACTIV-6 study.\",\"authors\":\"Carrie Reale, Janelle Faiman, Russ Beebe, Jessica S Marlin, Sean Collins, David R Boulware, Sarah E Dunsmore, Florence Thicklin, Thomas G Stewart, Adrian F Hernandez, Russell L Rothman, Christopher J Lindsell, Shilo Anders\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cts.2025.69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate recruitment and retention impede clinical trial goals. Emerging decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) leveraging digital health technologies (DHTs) for remote recruitment and data collection aim to address barriers to participation in traditional trials. The ACTIV-6 trial is a DCT using DHTs, but participants' experiences of such trials remain largely unknown. This study explored participants' perspectives of the ACTIV-6 DCT that tested outpatient COVID-19 therapeutics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in the ACTIV-6 study were recruited via email to share their day-to-day trial experiences during 1-hour virtual focus groups. Two human factors researchers guided group discussions through a semi-structured script that probed expectations and perceptions of study activities. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using a grounded theory approach with open coding to identify key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight ACTIV-6 study participants aged 30+ years completed a virtual focus group including 1-4 participants each. Analysis yielded three major themes: perceptions of the DCT experience, study activity engagement, and trust. Participants perceived the use of remote DCT procedures supported by DHTs as an acceptable and efficient method of organizing and tracking study activities, communicating with study personnel, and managing study medications at home. Use of social media was effective in supporting geographically dispersed participant recruitment but also raised issues with trust and study legitimacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While participants in this qualitative study viewed the DCT-with-DHT approach as reasonably efficient and engaging, they also identified challenges to address. Understanding facilitators and barriers to DCT participation and DHT interaction can help improve future research design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209966/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:招募和保留不足阻碍了临床试验目标的实现。新兴的分散临床试验(dct)利用数字卫生技术进行远程招募和数据收集,旨在解决参与传统试验的障碍。ACTIV-6试验是一种使用dht的DCT,但参与者在此类试验中的经历在很大程度上仍然未知。本研究探讨了参与者对测试门诊COVID-19治疗方法的ACTIV-6 DCT的看法。方法:通过电子邮件招募ACTIV-6研究的参与者,在1小时的虚拟焦点小组中分享他们的日常试验经验。两位人为因素研究人员通过半结构化的脚本引导小组讨论,探索对学习活动的期望和看法。定性数据分析是使用一个接地理论方法与开放编码,以确定关键主题。结果:28名30岁以上的参与者完成了一个虚拟焦点小组,每个小组1-4名参与者。分析产生了三个主要主题:对DCT体验的感知、学习活动的参与和信任。参与者认为使用dht支持的远程DCT程序是组织和跟踪研究活动、与研究人员沟通以及在家管理研究药物的一种可接受且有效的方法。社交媒体的使用在支持地理位置分散的参与者招募方面是有效的,但也引发了信任和研究合法性方面的问题。结论:虽然本定性研究的参与者认为dct - dht方法相当有效和吸引人,但他们也确定了需要解决的挑战。了解DCT参与和DHT互动的促进因素和障碍有助于改进未来的研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Participant experiences in a decentralized clinical trial using digital health technologies: The ACTIV-6 study.

Background: Inadequate recruitment and retention impede clinical trial goals. Emerging decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) leveraging digital health technologies (DHTs) for remote recruitment and data collection aim to address barriers to participation in traditional trials. The ACTIV-6 trial is a DCT using DHTs, but participants' experiences of such trials remain largely unknown. This study explored participants' perspectives of the ACTIV-6 DCT that tested outpatient COVID-19 therapeutics.

Methods: Participants in the ACTIV-6 study were recruited via email to share their day-to-day trial experiences during 1-hour virtual focus groups. Two human factors researchers guided group discussions through a semi-structured script that probed expectations and perceptions of study activities. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using a grounded theory approach with open coding to identify key themes.

Results: Twenty-eight ACTIV-6 study participants aged 30+ years completed a virtual focus group including 1-4 participants each. Analysis yielded three major themes: perceptions of the DCT experience, study activity engagement, and trust. Participants perceived the use of remote DCT procedures supported by DHTs as an acceptable and efficient method of organizing and tracking study activities, communicating with study personnel, and managing study medications at home. Use of social media was effective in supporting geographically dispersed participant recruitment but also raised issues with trust and study legitimacy.

Conclusions: While participants in this qualitative study viewed the DCT-with-DHT approach as reasonably efficient and engaging, they also identified challenges to address. Understanding facilitators and barriers to DCT participation and DHT interaction can help improve future research design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信